将清单大致等份的最佳方法是什么?例如，如果列表有7个元素，并将其分为2部分，我们希望其中一部分有3个元素，而另一部分应该有4个元素。
我正在寻找类似even_split(L, n)的东西，它将L分解为n部分。
def chunks(L, n):
""" Yield successive n-sized chunks from L.
"""
for i in range(0, len(L), n):
yield L[i:i+n]
上面的代码给出了3个块，而不是3个块。我可以简单地转置(遍历这个，取每列的第一个元素，称之为第一部分，然后取第二个元素，把它放在第二部分，等等)，但这破坏了项目的顺序。
当前回答
def evenly(l, n):
len_ = len(l)
split_size = len_ // n
split_size = n if not split_size else split_size
offsets = [i for i in range(0, len_, split_size)]
return [l[offset:offset + split_size] for offset in offsets]
例子:
L = [a for a in range(97)]应由10个部分组成，除最后一个部分外，每个部分有9个元素。
输出:
[[0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8],
[9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17],
[18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26],
[27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35],
[36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44],
[45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53],
[54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62],
[63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71],
[72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80],
[81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89],
[90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96]]
其他回答
看到more_itertools.divide:
n = 2
[list(x) for x in mit.divide(n, range(5, 11))]
# [[5, 6, 7], [8, 9, 10]]
[list(x) for x in mit.divide(n, range(5, 12))]
# [[5, 6, 7, 8], [9, 10, 11]]
通过> pip Install more_itertools安装。
这段代码为我工作(python3兼容):
def chunkify(tab, num):
return [tab[i*num: i*num+num] for i in range(len(tab)//num+(1 if len(tab)%num else 0))]
示例(适用于bytearray类型，但也适用于列表):
b = bytearray(b'\x01\x02\x03\x04\x05\x06\x07\x08')
>>> chunkify(b,3)
[bytearray(b'\x01\x02\x03'), bytearray(b'\x04\x05\x06'), bytearray(b'\x07\x08')]
>>> chunkify(b,4)
[bytearray(b'\x01\x02\x03\x04'), bytearray(b'\x05\x06\x07\x08')]
将代码更改为产生n个块，而不是n个块:
def chunks(l, n):
""" Yield n successive chunks from l.
"""
newn = int(len(l) / n)
for i in xrange(0, n-1):
yield l[i*newn:i*newn+newn]
yield l[n*newn-newn:]
l = range(56)
three_chunks = chunks (l, 3)
print three_chunks.next()
print three_chunks.next()
print three_chunks.next()
这使:
[0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17]
[18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35]
[36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55]
这将把额外的元素分配给最后一组，这并不完美，但在你的“大致N相等部分”的规范范围内:-)我的意思是，56个元素作为(19,19,18)会更好，而这给出(18,18,20)。
你可以用下面的代码得到更均衡的输出:
#!/usr/bin/python
def chunks(l, n):
""" Yield n successive chunks from l.
"""
newn = int(1.0 * len(l) / n + 0.5)
for i in xrange(0, n-1):
yield l[i*newn:i*newn+newn]
yield l[n*newn-newn:]
l = range(56)
three_chunks = chunks (l, 3)
print three_chunks.next()
print three_chunks.next()
print three_chunks.next()
输出:
[0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18]
[19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37]
[38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55]
这里有一个生成器，可以处理任何正(整数)数量的块。如果块的数量大于输入列表的长度，一些块将为空。该算法在短块和长块之间交替，而不是将它们分开。
我还包含了一些用于测试ragged_chunks函数的代码。
''' Split a list into "ragged" chunks
The size of each chunk is either the floor or ceiling of len(seq) / chunks
chunks can be > len(seq), in which case there will be empty chunks
Written by PM 2Ring 2017.03.30
'''
def ragged_chunks(seq, chunks):
size = len(seq)
start = 0
for i in range(1, chunks + 1):
stop = i * size // chunks
yield seq[start:stop]
start = stop
# test
def test_ragged_chunks(maxsize):
for size in range(0, maxsize):
seq = list(range(size))
for chunks in range(1, size + 1):
minwidth = size // chunks
#ceiling division
maxwidth = -(-size // chunks)
a = list(ragged_chunks(seq, chunks))
sizes = [len(u) for u in a]
deltas = all(minwidth <= u <= maxwidth for u in sizes)
assert all((sum(a, []) == seq, sum(sizes) == size, deltas))
return True
if test_ragged_chunks(100):
print('ok')
我们可以通过将乘法导出到range调用中来稍微提高效率，但我认为以前的版本更易于阅读(和dry)。
def ragged_chunks(seq, chunks):
size = len(seq)
start = 0
for i in range(size, size * chunks + 1, size):
stop = i // chunks
yield seq[start:stop]
start = stop
如果你不介意顺序会改变，我建议你使用@job solution，否则，你可以使用这个:
def chunkIt(seq, num):
steps = int(len(seq) / float(num))
out = []
last = 0.0
while last < len(seq):
if len(seq) - (last + steps) < steps:
until = len(seq)
steps = len(seq) - last
else:
until = int(last + steps)
out.append(seq[int(last): until])
last += steps
return out
