将清单大致等份的最佳方法是什么?例如，如果列表有7个元素，并将其分为2部分，我们希望其中一部分有3个元素，而另一部分应该有4个元素。
我正在寻找类似even_split(L, n)的东西，它将L分解为n部分。
def chunks(L, n):
""" Yield successive n-sized chunks from L.
"""
for i in range(0, len(L), n):
yield L[i:i+n]
上面的代码给出了3个块，而不是3个块。我可以简单地转置(遍历这个，取每列的第一个元素，称之为第一部分，然后取第二个元素，把它放在第二部分，等等)，但这破坏了项目的顺序。
当前回答
这里有一个单独的函数，它处理了大多数不同的分裂情况:
def splitList(lst, into):
'''Split a list into parts.
:Parameters:
into (str) = Split the list into parts defined by the following:
'<n>parts' - Split the list into n parts.
ex. 2 returns: [[1, 2, 3, 5], [7, 8, 9]] from [1,2,3,5,7,8,9]
'<n>parts+' - Split the list into n equal parts with any trailing remainder.
ex. 2 returns: [[1, 2, 3], [5, 7, 8], [9]] from [1,2,3,5,7,8,9]
'<n>chunks' - Split into sublists of n size.
ex. 2 returns: [[1,2], [3,5], [7,8], [9]] from [1,2,3,5,7,8,9]
'contiguous' - The list will be split by contiguous numerical values.
ex. 'contiguous' returns: [[1,2,3], [5], [7,8,9]] from [1,2,3,5,7,8,9]
'range' - The values of 'contiguous' will be limited to the high and low end of each range.
ex. 'range' returns: [[1,3], [5], [7,9]] from [1,2,3,5,7,8,9]
:Return:
(list)
'''
from string import digits, ascii_letters, punctuation
mode = into.lower().lstrip(digits)
digit = into.strip(ascii_letters+punctuation)
n = int(digit) if digit else None
if n:
if mode=='parts':
n = len(lst)*-1 // n*-1 #ceil
elif mode=='parts+':
n = len(lst) // n
return [lst[i:i+n] for i in range(0, len(lst), n)]
elif mode=='contiguous' or mode=='range':
from itertools import groupby
from operator import itemgetter
try:
contiguous = [list(map(itemgetter(1), g)) for k, g in groupby(enumerate(lst), lambda x: int(x[0])-int(x[1]))]
except ValueError as error:
print ('{} in splitList\n # Error: {} #\n {}'.format(__file__, error, lst))
return lst
if mode=='range':
return [[i[0], i[-1]] if len(i)>1 else (i) for i in contiguous]
return contiguous
r = splitList([1, '2', 3, 5, '7', 8, 9], into='2parts')
print (r) #returns: [[1, '2', 3, 5], ['7', 8, 9]]
其他回答
看到more_itertools.divide:
n = 2
[list(x) for x in mit.divide(n, range(5, 11))]
# [[5, 6, 7], [8, 9, 10]]
[list(x) for x in mit.divide(n, range(5, 12))]
# [[5, 6, 7, 8], [9, 10, 11]]
通过> pip Install more_itertools安装。
下面是一个添加None以使列表长度相等的列表
>>> from itertools import izip_longest
>>> def chunks(l, n):
""" Yield n successive chunks from l. Pads extra spaces with None
"""
return list(zip(*izip_longest(*[iter(l)]*n)))
>>> l=range(54)
>>> chunks(l,3)
[(0, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 27, 30, 33, 36, 39, 42, 45, 48, 51), (1, 4, 7, 10, 13, 16, 19, 22, 25, 28, 31, 34, 37, 40, 43, 46, 49, 52), (2, 5, 8, 11, 14, 17, 20, 23, 26, 29, 32, 35, 38, 41, 44, 47, 50, 53)]
>>> chunks(l,4)
[(0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52), (1, 5, 9, 13, 17, 21, 25, 29, 33, 37, 41, 45, 49, 53), (2, 6, 10, 14, 18, 22, 26, 30, 34, 38, 42, 46, 50, None), (3, 7, 11, 15, 19, 23, 27, 31, 35, 39, 43, 47, 51, None)]
>>> chunks(l,5)
[(0, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50), (1, 6, 11, 16, 21, 26, 31, 36, 41, 46, 51), (2, 7, 12, 17, 22, 27, 32, 37, 42, 47, 52), (3, 8, 13, 18, 23, 28, 33, 38, 43, 48, 53), (4, 9, 14, 19, 24, 29, 34, 39, 44, 49, None)]
这将通过一个表达式将其拆分为相等的部分，同时保持顺序:
myList = list(range(18)) # given list
N = 5 # desired number of parts
[myList[(i*len(myList))//N:((i+1)*len(myList))//N] for i in range(N)]
# [[0, 1, 2], [3, 4, 5, 6], [7, 8, 9], [10, 11, 12, 13], [14, 15, 16, 17]]
各部分的差异不超过一个元素。把18分成5份，结果是3 + 4 + 3 + 4 + 4 = 18。
由于舍入错误，此代码被破坏。不要使用它!!
assert len(chunkIt([1,2,3], 10)) == 10 # fails
这里有一个可行的方法:
def chunkIt(seq, num):
avg = len(seq) / float(num)
out = []
last = 0.0
while last < len(seq):
out.append(seq[int(last):int(last + avg)])
last += avg
return out
测试:
>>> chunkIt(range(10), 3)
[[0, 1, 2], [3, 4, 5], [6, 7, 8, 9]]
>>> chunkIt(range(11), 3)
[[0, 1, 2], [3, 4, 5, 6], [7, 8, 9, 10]]
>>> chunkIt(range(12), 3)
[[0, 1, 2, 3], [4, 5, 6, 7], [8, 9, 10, 11]]
这里有一个生成器，可以处理任何正(整数)数量的块。如果块的数量大于输入列表的长度，一些块将为空。该算法在短块和长块之间交替，而不是将它们分开。
我还包含了一些用于测试ragged_chunks函数的代码。
''' Split a list into "ragged" chunks
The size of each chunk is either the floor or ceiling of len(seq) / chunks
chunks can be > len(seq), in which case there will be empty chunks
Written by PM 2Ring 2017.03.30
'''
def ragged_chunks(seq, chunks):
size = len(seq)
start = 0
for i in range(1, chunks + 1):
stop = i * size // chunks
yield seq[start:stop]
start = stop
# test
def test_ragged_chunks(maxsize):
for size in range(0, maxsize):
seq = list(range(size))
for chunks in range(1, size + 1):
minwidth = size // chunks
#ceiling division
maxwidth = -(-size // chunks)
a = list(ragged_chunks(seq, chunks))
sizes = [len(u) for u in a]
deltas = all(minwidth <= u <= maxwidth for u in sizes)
assert all((sum(a, []) == seq, sum(sizes) == size, deltas))
return True
if test_ragged_chunks(100):
print('ok')
我们可以通过将乘法导出到range调用中来稍微提高效率，但我认为以前的版本更易于阅读(和dry)。
def ragged_chunks(seq, chunks):
size = len(seq)
start = 0
for i in range(size, size * chunks + 1, size):
stop = i // chunks
yield seq[start:stop]
start = stop
