将清单大致等份的最佳方法是什么?例如，如果列表有7个元素，并将其分为2部分，我们希望其中一部分有3个元素，而另一部分应该有4个元素。
我正在寻找类似even_split(L, n)的东西，它将L分解为n部分。
def chunks(L, n):
""" Yield successive n-sized chunks from L.
"""
for i in range(0, len(L), n):
yield L[i:i+n]
上面的代码给出了3个块，而不是3个块。我可以简单地转置(遍历这个，取每列的第一个元素，称之为第一部分，然后取第二个元素，把它放在第二部分，等等)，但这破坏了项目的顺序。
当前回答
这里有一个单独的函数，它处理了大多数不同的分裂情况:
def splitList(lst, into):
'''Split a list into parts.
:Parameters:
into (str) = Split the list into parts defined by the following:
'<n>parts' - Split the list into n parts.
ex. 2 returns: [[1, 2, 3, 5], [7, 8, 9]] from [1,2,3,5,7,8,9]
'<n>parts+' - Split the list into n equal parts with any trailing remainder.
ex. 2 returns: [[1, 2, 3], [5, 7, 8], [9]] from [1,2,3,5,7,8,9]
'<n>chunks' - Split into sublists of n size.
ex. 2 returns: [[1,2], [3,5], [7,8], [9]] from [1,2,3,5,7,8,9]
'contiguous' - The list will be split by contiguous numerical values.
ex. 'contiguous' returns: [[1,2,3], [5], [7,8,9]] from [1,2,3,5,7,8,9]
'range' - The values of 'contiguous' will be limited to the high and low end of each range.
ex. 'range' returns: [[1,3], [5], [7,9]] from [1,2,3,5,7,8,9]
:Return:
(list)
'''
from string import digits, ascii_letters, punctuation
mode = into.lower().lstrip(digits)
digit = into.strip(ascii_letters+punctuation)
n = int(digit) if digit else None
if n:
if mode=='parts':
n = len(lst)*-1 // n*-1 #ceil
elif mode=='parts+':
n = len(lst) // n
return [lst[i:i+n] for i in range(0, len(lst), n)]
elif mode=='contiguous' or mode=='range':
from itertools import groupby
from operator import itemgetter
try:
contiguous = [list(map(itemgetter(1), g)) for k, g in groupby(enumerate(lst), lambda x: int(x[0])-int(x[1]))]
except ValueError as error:
print ('{} in splitList\n # Error: {} #\n {}'.format(__file__, error, lst))
return lst
if mode=='range':
return [[i[0], i[-1]] if len(i)>1 else (i) for i in contiguous]
return contiguous
r = splitList([1, '2', 3, 5, '7', 8, 9], into='2parts')
print (r) #returns: [[1, '2', 3, 5], ['7', 8, 9]]
其他回答
def chunk_array(array : List, n: int) -> List[List]:
chunk_size = len(array) // n
chunks = []
i = 0
while i < len(array):
# if less than chunk_size left add the remainder to last element
if len(array) - (i + chunk_size + 1) < 0:
chunks[-1].append(*array[i:i + chunk_size])
break
else:
chunks.append(array[i:i + chunk_size])
i += chunk_size
return chunks
这是我的版本(灵感来自Max)
由于舍入错误，此代码被破坏。不要使用它!!
assert len(chunkIt([1,2,3], 10)) == 10 # fails
这里有一个可行的方法:
def chunkIt(seq, num):
avg = len(seq) / float(num)
out = []
last = 0.0
while last < len(seq):
out.append(seq[int(last):int(last + avg)])
last += avg
return out
测试:
>>> chunkIt(range(10), 3)
[[0, 1, 2], [3, 4, 5], [6, 7, 8, 9]]
>>> chunkIt(range(11), 3)
[[0, 1, 2], [3, 4, 5, 6], [7, 8, 9, 10]]
>>> chunkIt(range(12), 3)
[[0, 1, 2, 3], [4, 5, 6, 7], [8, 9, 10, 11]]
def evenly(l, n):
len_ = len(l)
split_size = len_ // n
split_size = n if not split_size else split_size
offsets = [i for i in range(0, len_, split_size)]
return [l[offset:offset + split_size] for offset in offsets]
例子:
L = [a for a in range(97)]应由10个部分组成，除最后一个部分外，每个部分有9个元素。
输出:
[[0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8],
[9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17],
[18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26],
[27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35],
[36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44],
[45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53],
[54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62],
[63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71],
[72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80],
[81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89],
[90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96]]
将代码更改为产生n个块，而不是n个块:
def chunks(l, n):
""" Yield n successive chunks from l.
"""
newn = int(len(l) / n)
for i in xrange(0, n-1):
yield l[i*newn:i*newn+newn]
yield l[n*newn-newn:]
l = range(56)
three_chunks = chunks (l, 3)
print three_chunks.next()
print three_chunks.next()
print three_chunks.next()
这使:
[0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17]
[18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35]
[36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55]
这将把额外的元素分配给最后一组，这并不完美，但在你的“大致N相等部分”的规范范围内:-)我的意思是，56个元素作为(19,19,18)会更好，而这给出(18,18,20)。
你可以用下面的代码得到更均衡的输出:
#!/usr/bin/python
def chunks(l, n):
""" Yield n successive chunks from l.
"""
newn = int(1.0 * len(l) / n + 0.5)
for i in xrange(0, n-1):
yield l[i*newn:i*newn+newn]
yield l[n*newn-newn:]
l = range(56)
three_chunks = chunks (l, 3)
print three_chunks.next()
print three_chunks.next()
print three_chunks.next()
输出:
[0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18]
[19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37]
[38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55]
这就是numpy.array_split*使用d'être的原因:
>>> import numpy as np
>>> print(*np.array_split(range(10), 3))
[0 1 2 3] [4 5 6] [7 8 9]
>>> print(*np.array_split(range(10), 4))
[0 1 2] [3 4 5] [6 7] [8 9]
>>> print(*np.array_split(range(10), 5))
[0 1] [2 3] [4 5] [6 7] [8 9]
*贷方是6号房间的零比雷埃夫斯
