如果你想要一个单行程序，而不需要像lodash那样庞大的库，我建议你使用deepmerge (npm install deepmerge)或deepmerge-ts (npm install deepmerge-ts)。

deepmerge也为TypeScript提供了类型，并且更加稳定(因为它比较老)，但是deepmerge-ts也可用于Deno，并且从设计上看更快，尽管顾名思义是用TypeScript编写的。

一旦导入就可以了

deepmerge({ a: 1, b: 2, c: 3 }, { a: 2, d: 3 });

得到

{ a: 2, b: 2, c: 3, d: 3 }

这对于复杂的对象和数组非常有效。这是一个真正的全面解决方案。

与减少

export const merge = (objFrom, objTo) => Object.keys(objFrom)
    .reduce(
        (merged, key) => {
            merged[key] = objFrom[key] instanceof Object && !Array.isArray(objFrom[key])
                ? merge(objFrom[key], merged[key] ?? {})
                : objFrom[key]
            return merged
        }, { ...objTo }
    )

test('merge', async () => {
    const obj1 = { par1: -1, par2: { par2_1: -21, par2_5: -25 }, arr: [0,1,2] }
    const obj2 = { par1: 1, par2: { par2_1: 21 }, par3: 3, arr: [3,4,5] }
    const obj3 = merge3(obj1, obj2)
    expect(obj3).toEqual(
        { par1: -1, par2: { par2_1: -21, par2_5: -25 }, par3: 3, arr: [0,1,2] }
    )
})

使用这个函数:

merge(target, source, mutable = false) {
        const newObj = typeof target == 'object' ? (mutable ? target : Object.assign({}, target)) : {};
        for (const prop in source) {
            if (target[prop] == null || typeof target[prop] === 'undefined') {
                newObj[prop] = source[prop];
            } else if (Array.isArray(target[prop])) {
                newObj[prop] = source[prop] || target[prop];
            } else if (target[prop] instanceof RegExp) {
                newObj[prop] = source[prop] || target[prop];
            } else {
                newObj[prop] = typeof source[prop] === 'object' ? this.merge(target[prop], source[prop]) : source[prop];
            }
        }
        return newObj;
    }

(本机解决方案)如果你知道你想要深度合并的属性，那么

const x = { a: { a: 1 } }
const y = { a: { b: 1 } }
Object.assign(y.a, x.a);
Object.assign(x, y);
// output: a: {b: 1, a: 1}

我用es6做这个方法进行深度赋值。

function isObject(item) {
  return (item && typeof item === 'object' && !Array.isArray(item) && item !== null)
}

function deepAssign(...objs) {
    if (objs.length < 2) {
        throw new Error('Need two or more objects to merge')
    }

    const target = objs[0]
    for (let i = 1; i < objs.length; i++) {
        const source = objs[i]
        Object.keys(source).forEach(prop => {
            const value = source[prop]
            if (isObject(value)) {
                if (target.hasOwnProperty(prop) && isObject(target[prop])) {
                    target[prop] = deepAssign(target[prop], value)
                } else {
                    target[prop] = value
                }
            } else if (Array.isArray(value)) {
                if (target.hasOwnProperty(prop) && Array.isArray(target[prop])) {
                    const targetArray = target[prop]
                    value.forEach((sourceItem, itemIndex) => {
                        if (itemIndex < targetArray.length) {
                            const targetItem = targetArray[itemIndex]

                            if (Object.is(targetItem, sourceItem)) {
                                return
                            }

                            if (isObject(targetItem) && isObject(sourceItem)) {
                                targetArray[itemIndex] = deepAssign(targetItem, sourceItem)
                            } else if (Array.isArray(targetItem) && Array.isArray(sourceItem)) {
                                targetArray[itemIndex] = deepAssign(targetItem, sourceItem)
                            } else {
                                targetArray[itemIndex] = sourceItem
                            }
                        } else {
                            targetArray.push(sourceItem)
                        }
                    })
                } else {
                    target[prop] = value
                }
            } else {
                target[prop] = value
            }
        })
    }

    return target
}

当涉及到宿主对象或比值包更复杂的任何类型的对象时，这个问题就不那么简单了

do you invoke a getter to obtain a value or do you copy over the property descriptor? what if the merge target has a setter (either own property or in its prototype chain)? Do you consider the value as already-present or call the setter to update the current value? do you invoke own-property functions or copy them over? What if they're bound functions or arrow functions depending on something in their scope chain at the time they were defined? what if it's something like a DOM node? You certainly don't want to treat it as simple object and just deep-merge all its properties over into how to deal with "simple" structures like arrays or maps or sets? Consider them already-present or merge them too? how to deal with non-enumerable own properties? what about new subtrees? Simply assign by reference or deep clone? how to deal with frozen/sealed/non-extensible objects?

另一件需要记住的事情是:包含循环的对象图。这通常不难处理——简单地保留一组已经访问过的源对象——但经常被遗忘。

您可能应该编写一个深度合并函数，它只期望原始值和简单对象(结构化克隆算法最多可以处理的那些类型)作为合并源。如果遇到它不能处理的东西，或者只是通过引用而不是深度合并进行赋值，则抛出。

换句话说，没有一种适合所有人的算法，您要么必须使用自己的算法，要么寻找恰好涵盖您的用例的库方法。