Intersect可以用来查找两个集合之间的匹配,如下所示:

// Assign two arrays.
int[] array1 = { 1, 2, 3 };
int[] array2 = { 2, 3, 4 };
// Call Intersect extension method.
var intersect = array1.Intersect(array2);
// Write intersection to screen.
foreach (int value in intersect)
{
    Console.WriteLine(value); // Output: 2, 3
}

然而,我想实现的是相反的,我想从一个集合中列出从另一个集合中缺失的项目:

// Assign two arrays.
int[] array1 = { 1, 2, 3 };
int[] array2 = { 2, 3, 4 };
// Call "NonIntersect" extension method.
var intersect = array1.NonIntersect(array2); // I've made up the NonIntersect method
// Write intersection to screen.
foreach (int value in intersect)
{
    Console.WriteLine(value); // Output: 4
}

当前回答

array1.NonIntersect (array2);

不相交这样的运算符在Linq中是不存在的你应该做的

Except -> union -> Except

a.except(b).union(b.Except(a));

其他回答

/// <summary>
/// Given two list, compare and extract differences
/// http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5620266/the-opposite-of-intersect
/// </summary>
public class CompareList
{
    /// <summary>
    /// Returns list of items that are in initial but not in final list.
    /// </summary>
    /// <param name="listA"></param>
    /// <param name="listB"></param>
    /// <returns></returns>
    public static IEnumerable<string> NonIntersect(
        List<string> initial, List<string> final)
    {
        //subtracts the content of initial from final
        //assumes that final.length < initial.length
        return initial.Except(final);
    }

    /// <summary>
    /// Returns the symmetric difference between the two list.
    /// http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Symmetric_difference
    /// </summary>
    /// <param name="initial"></param>
    /// <param name="final"></param>
    /// <returns></returns>
    public static IEnumerable<string> SymmetricDifference(
        List<string> initial, List<string> final)
    {
        IEnumerable<string> setA = NonIntersect(final, initial);
        IEnumerable<string> setB = NonIntersect(initial, final);
        // sum and return the two set.
        return setA.Concat(setB);
    }
}

如上所述,如果你想要得到4作为结果,你可以这样做:

var nonintersect = array2.Except(array1);

如果你想要真正的非交集(也是1和4),那么这个应该可以做到:

var nonintersect = array1.Except(array2).Union( array2.Except(array1));

这不是性能最好的解决方案,但对于小列表来说,它应该工作得很好。

你可以使用

a.Except(b).Union(b.Except(a));

或者你可以用

var difference = new HashSet(a);
difference.SymmetricExceptWith(b);
string left = "411329_SOFT_MAC_GREEN";
string right= "SOFT_MAC_GREEN";

string[] l = left.Split('_');
string[] r = right.Split('_');

string[] distinctLeft = l.Distinct().ToArray();
string[] distinctRight = r.Distinct().ToArray();

var commonWord = l.Except(r, StringComparer.OrdinalIgnoreCase)
string result = String.Join("_",commonWord);
result = "411329"

这段代码只枚举每个序列一次,并使用Select(x => x)隐藏结果,以获得一个干净的linq风格的扩展方法。由于它使用哈希集<T>,如果哈希分布良好,它的运行时间为O(n + m)。两个列表中的重复元素将被省略。

public static IEnumerable<T> SymmetricExcept<T>(this IEnumerable<T> seq1,
    IEnumerable<T> seq2)
{
    HashSet<T> hashSet = new HashSet<T>(seq1);
    hashSet.SymmetricExceptWith(seq2);
    return hashSet.Select(x => x);
}