为dict寻找一个简单的包装器类，支持属性样式的键访问/赋值(点表示法)，我对现有选项不满意，原因如下。

数据类、pydantic等都很棒，但需要对内容进行静态定义。此外，它们不能在依赖dict的代码中替换dict，因为它们不共享相同的方法，并且不支持__getitem__()语法。

因此，我开发了MetaDict。它的行为完全类似于dict，但支持点表示法和IDE自动补全(如果对象被加载到RAM中)，而没有其他解决方案的缺点和潜在的名称空间冲突。所有功能和使用示例都可以在GitHub上找到(见上面的链接)。

完全披露:我是MetaDict的作者。

我在尝试其他解决方案时遇到的缺点/限制:

Addict No key autocompletion in IDE Nested key assignment cannot be turned off Newly assigned dict objects are not converted to support attribute-style key access Shadows inbuilt type Dict Prodict No key autocompletion in IDE without defining a static schema (similar to dataclass) No recursive conversion of dict objects when embedded in list or other inbuilt iterables AttrDict No key autocompletion in IDE Converts list objects to tuple behind the scenes Munch Inbuilt methods like items(), update(), etc. can be overwritten with obj.items = [1, 2, 3] No recursive conversion of dict objects when embedded in list or other inbuilt iterables EasyDict Only strings are valid keys, but dict accepts all hashable objects as keys Inbuilt methods like items(), update(), etc. can be overwritten with obj.items = [1, 2, 3] Inbuilt methods don't behave as expected: obj.pop('unknown_key', None) raises an AttributeError

注意:我在这个stackoverflow中写了一个类似的答案，这是相关的。

x = type('new_dict', (object,), d)

然后再加上递归，就完成了。

编辑这是我如何实现它:

>>> d
{'a': 1, 'b': {'c': 2}, 'd': ['hi', {'foo': 'bar'}]}
>>> def obj_dic(d):
    top = type('new', (object,), d)
    seqs = tuple, list, set, frozenset
    for i, j in d.items():
        if isinstance(j, dict):
            setattr(top, i, obj_dic(j))
        elif isinstance(j, seqs):
            setattr(top, i, 
                type(j)(obj_dic(sj) if isinstance(sj, dict) else sj for sj in j))
        else:
            setattr(top, i, j)
    return top

>>> x = obj_dic(d)
>>> x.a
1
>>> x.b.c
2
>>> x.d[1].foo
'bar'

I ended up trying BOTH the AttrDict and the Bunch libraries and found them to be way too slow for my uses. After a friend and I looked into it, we found that the main method for writing these libraries results in the library aggressively recursing through a nested object and making copies of the dictionary object throughout. With this in mind, we made two key changes. 1) We made attributes lazy-loaded 2) instead of creating copies of a dictionary object, we create copies of a light-weight proxy object. This is the final implementation. The performance increase of using this code is incredible. When using AttrDict or Bunch, these two libraries alone consumed 1/2 and 1/3 respectively of my request time(what!?). This code reduced that time to almost nothing(somewhere in the range of 0.5ms). This of course depends on your needs, but if you are using this functionality quite a bit in your code, definitely go with something simple like this.

class DictProxy(object):
    def __init__(self, obj):
        self.obj = obj

    def __getitem__(self, key):
        return wrap(self.obj[key])

    def __getattr__(self, key):
        try:
            return wrap(getattr(self.obj, key))
        except AttributeError:
            try:
                return self[key]
            except KeyError:
                raise AttributeError(key)

    # you probably also want to proxy important list properties along like
    # items(), iteritems() and __len__

class ListProxy(object):
    def __init__(self, obj):
        self.obj = obj

    def __getitem__(self, key):
        return wrap(self.obj[key])

    # you probably also want to proxy important list properties along like
    # __iter__ and __len__

def wrap(value):
    if isinstance(value, dict):
        return DictProxy(value)
    if isinstance(value, (tuple, list)):
        return ListProxy(value)
    return value

参见https://stackoverflow.com/users/704327/michael-merickel的原始实现。

另一件需要注意的事情是，这个实现非常简单，并且没有实现您可能需要的所有方法。您需要根据需要在DictProxy或ListProxy对象上写入这些内容。

通常情况下，您希望将字典层次结构镜像到对象中，而不是列表或元组，它们通常处于最低级别。我是这样做的:

class defDictToObject(object):

    def __init__(self, myDict):
        for key, value in myDict.items():
            if type(value) == dict:
                setattr(self, key, defDictToObject(value))
            else:
                setattr(self, key, value)

所以我们这样做:

myDict = { 'a': 1,
           'b': { 
              'b1': {'x': 1,
                    'y': 2} },
           'c': ['hi', 'bar'] 
         }

并获得:

x.b.b1。* 1

X.c ['hi'， 'bar']

我有一些__getattr__没有被调用的问题，所以我构造了一个新的样式类版本:

class Struct(object):
    '''The recursive class for building and representing objects with.'''
    class NoneStruct(object):
        def __getattribute__(*args):
            return Struct.NoneStruct()

        def __eq__(self, obj):
            return obj == None

    def __init__(self, obj):
        for k, v in obj.iteritems():
            if isinstance(v, dict):
                setattr(self, k, Struct(v))
            else:
                setattr(self, k, v)

    def __getattribute__(*args):
        try:
            return object.__getattribute__(*args)
        except:            
            return Struct.NoneStruct()

    def __repr__(self):
        return '{%s}' % str(', '.join('%s : %s' % (k, repr(v)) for 
(k, v) in self.__dict__.iteritems()))

该版本还增加了一个NoneStruct，当未设置的属性被调用时返回。这允许使用None测试来查看属性是否存在。非常有用时，确切的字典输入是不知道的(设置等)。

bla = Struct({'a':{'b':1}})
print(bla.a.b)
>> 1
print(bla.a.c == None)
>> True

我知道这里已经有很多答案了，我迟到了，但这个方法将递归和“就地”将字典转换为类对象结构……适用于3.x.x

def dictToObject(d):
    for k,v in d.items():
        if isinstance(v, dict):
            d[k] = dictToObject(v)
    return namedtuple('object', d.keys())(*d.values())

# Dictionary created from JSON file
d = {
    'primaryKey': 'id', 
    'metadata': 
        {
            'rows': 0, 
            'lastID': 0
        }, 
    'columns': 
        {
            'col2': {
                'dataType': 'string', 
                'name': 'addressLine1'
            }, 
            'col1': {
                'datatype': 'string', 
                'name': 'postcode'
            }, 
            'col3': {
                'dataType': 'string', 
                'name': 'addressLine2'
            }, 
            'col0': {
                'datatype': 'integer', 
                'name': 'id'
            }, 
            'col4': {
                'dataType': 'string', 
                'name': 'contactNumber'
            }
        }, 
        'secondaryKeys': {}
}

d1 = dictToObject(d)
d1.columns.col1 # == object(datatype='string', name='postcode')
d1.metadata.rows # == 0