我正在寻找一种优雅的方式来获得数据使用属性访问字典与一些嵌套的字典和列表(即javascript风格的对象语法)。
例如:
>>> d = {'a': 1, 'b': {'c': 2}, 'd': ["hi", {'foo': "bar"}]}
应该以这样的方式访问:
>>> x = dict2obj(d)
>>> x.a
1
>>> x.b.c
2
>>> x.d[1].foo
bar
我想,如果没有递归,这是不可能的,但是有什么更好的方法来获得字典的对象样式呢?
我正在寻找一种优雅的方式来获得数据使用属性访问字典与一些嵌套的字典和列表(即javascript风格的对象语法)。
例如:
>>> d = {'a': 1, 'b': {'c': 2}, 'd': ["hi", {'foo': "bar"}]}
应该以这样的方式访问:
>>> x = dict2obj(d)
>>> x.a
1
>>> x.b.c
2
>>> x.d[1].foo
bar
我想,如果没有递归,这是不可能的,但是有什么更好的方法来获得字典的对象样式呢?
当前回答
你可以使用一个自定义对象钩子来利用标准库的json模块:
import json
class obj(object):
def __init__(self, dict_):
self.__dict__.update(dict_)
def dict2obj(d):
return json.loads(json.dumps(d), object_hook=obj)
使用示例:
>>> d = {'a': 1, 'b': {'c': 2}, 'd': ['hi', {'foo': 'bar'}]}
>>> o = dict2obj(d)
>>> o.a
1
>>> o.b.c
2
>>> o.d[0]
u'hi'
>>> o.d[1].foo
u'bar'
而且它不像namedtuple那样是严格只读的,也就是说,你可以改变值-而不是结构:
>>> o.b.c = 3
>>> o.b.c
3
其他回答
有一个 名为namedtuple的集合助手,可以为你做这些:
from collections import namedtuple
d_named = namedtuple('Struct', d.keys())(*d.values())
In [7]: d_named
Out[7]: Struct(a=1, b={'c': 2}, d=['hi', {'foo': 'bar'}])
In [8]: d_named.a
Out[8]: 1
class Struct(dict):
def __getattr__(self, name):
try:
return self[name]
except KeyError:
raise AttributeError(name)
def __setattr__(self, name, value):
self[name] = value
def copy(self):
return Struct(dict.copy(self))
用法:
points = Struct(x=1, y=2)
# Changing
points['x'] = 2
points.y = 1
# Accessing
points['x'], points.x, points.get('x') # 2 2 2
points['y'], points.y, points.get('y') # 1 1 1
# Accessing inexistent keys/attrs
points['z'] # KeyError: z
points.z # AttributeError: z
# Copying
points_copy = points.copy()
points.x = 2
points_copy.x # 1
如果你想访问dict键作为一个对象(或作为一个dict难键),做递归,也能够更新原来的dict,你可以这样做:
class Dictate(object):
"""Object view of a dict, updating the passed in dict when values are set
or deleted. "Dictate" the contents of a dict...: """
def __init__(self, d):
# since __setattr__ is overridden, self.__dict = d doesn't work
object.__setattr__(self, '_Dictate__dict', d)
# Dictionary-like access / updates
def __getitem__(self, name):
value = self.__dict[name]
if isinstance(value, dict): # recursively view sub-dicts as objects
value = Dictate(value)
return value
def __setitem__(self, name, value):
self.__dict[name] = value
def __delitem__(self, name):
del self.__dict[name]
# Object-like access / updates
def __getattr__(self, name):
return self[name]
def __setattr__(self, name, value):
self[name] = value
def __delattr__(self, name):
del self[name]
def __repr__(self):
return "%s(%r)" % (type(self).__name__, self.__dict)
def __str__(self):
return str(self.__dict)
使用示例:
d = {'a': 'b', 1: 2}
dd = Dictate(d)
assert dd.a == 'b' # Access like an object
assert dd[1] == 2 # Access like a dict
# Updates affect d
dd.c = 'd'
assert d['c'] == 'd'
del dd.a
del dd[1]
# Inner dicts are mapped
dd.e = {}
dd.e.f = 'g'
assert dd['e'].f == 'g'
assert d == {'c': 'd', 'e': {'f': 'g'}}
我不满意那些被标记和点赞的答案,所以这里有一个简单而通用的解决方案,用于将json风格的嵌套数据结构(由字典和列表组成)转换为普通对象的层次结构:
# tested in: Python 3.8
from collections import abc
from typings import Any, Iterable, Mapping, Union
class DataObject:
def __repr__(self):
return str({k: v for k, v in vars(self).items()})
def data_to_object(data: Union[Mapping[str, Any], Iterable]) -> object:
"""
Example
-------
>>> data = {
... "name": "Bob Howard",
... "positions": [{"department": "ER", "manager_id": 13}],
... }
... data_to_object(data).positions[0].manager_id
13
"""
if isinstance(data, abc.Mapping):
r = DataObject()
for k, v in data.items():
if type(v) is dict or type(v) is list:
setattr(r, k, data_to_object(v))
else:
setattr(r, k, v)
return r
elif isinstance(data, abc.Iterable):
return [data_to_object(e) for e in data]
else:
return data
构建我对“python:如何动态地向类添加属性?”:
class data(object):
def __init__(self,*args,**argd):
self.__dict__.update(dict(*args,**argd))
def makedata(d):
d2 = {}
for n in d:
d2[n] = trydata(d[n])
return data(d2)
def trydata(o):
if isinstance(o,dict):
return makedata(o)
elif isinstance(o,list):
return [trydata(i) for i in o]
else:
return o
在要转换的字典上调用makedata,或者根据期望的输入调用trydata,它将输出一个数据对象。
注:
如果需要更多功能,可以向trydata添加elif。 显然,如果你想要x.a ={}或类似的东西,这是行不通的。 如果您想要一个只读版本,请使用原始答案中的类数据。