考虑下面以串行/顺序方式读取文件数组的代码。readFiles返回一个承诺,只有在顺序读取所有文件后才会解析这个承诺。

var readFile = function(file) {
  ... // Returns a promise.
};

var readFiles = function(files) {
  return new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
    var readSequential = function(index) {
      if (index >= files.length) {
        resolve();
      } else {
        readFile(files[index]).then(function() {
          readSequential(index + 1);
        }).catch(reject);
      }
    };

    readSequential(0); // Start with the first file!
  });
};

上面的代码可以工作,但是我不喜欢为了使事情按顺序发生而进行递归。是否有一种更简单的方法可以重写这段代码,这样我就不必使用奇怪的readSequential函数了?

最初我尝试使用Promise。但是这会导致所有的readFile调用并发发生,这不是我想要的:

var readFiles = function(files) {
  return Promise.all(files.map(function(file) {
    return readFile(file);
  }));
};

当前回答

要在ES6中简单地做到这一点:

function(files) {
  // Create a new empty promise (don't do that with real people ;)
  var sequence = Promise.resolve();

  // Loop over each file, and add on a promise to the
  // end of the 'sequence' promise.
  files.forEach(file => {

    // Chain one computation onto the sequence
    sequence = 
      sequence
        .then(() => performComputation(file))
        .then(result => doSomething(result)); 
        // Resolves for each file, one at a time.

  })

  // This will resolve after the entire chain is resolved
  return sequence;
}

其他回答

下面是我比较喜欢的连续运行任务的方式。

function runSerial() {
    var that = this;
    // task1 is a function that returns a promise (and immediately starts executing)
    // task2 is a function that returns a promise (and immediately starts executing)
    return Promise.resolve()
        .then(function() {
            return that.task1();
        })
        .then(function() {
            return that.task2();
        })
        .then(function() {
            console.log(" ---- done ----");
        });
}

有更多任务的情况会怎样呢?10 ?

function runSerial(tasks) {
  var result = Promise.resolve();
  tasks.forEach(task => {
    result = result.then(() => task());
  });
  return result;
}

只需使用.then(resPrevTask => nextTask())

(顺便说一下,下一个代码需要4秒。)

函数task1() { return new Promise((resolve) => { setTimeout(() => { 解决(console.log(任务1)) }, 3000) }) } 函数task2() { return new Promise((resolve) => { setTimeout(() => { 解决(console.log(任务2)) }, 1000) }) } 函数seqTasks () { task1 () .then(() => task2()) } seqTasks ();

这是上面另一个答案的轻微变化。使用原生承诺:

function inSequence(tasks) {
    return tasks.reduce((p, task) => p.then(task), Promise.resolve())
}

解释

如果你有这些任务[t1, t2, t3],那么上面的等价于Promise.resolve().then(t1).then(t2).then(t3)。这是约简的行为。

如何使用

首先你需要构造一个任务列表!任务是不接受实参的函数。如果需要将参数传递给函数,则使用bind或其他方法创建任务。例如:

var tasks = files.map(file => processFile.bind(null, file))
inSequence(tasks).then(...)

数组push和pop方法可用于承诺序列。当你需要额外的数据时,你也可以推出新的承诺。这是代码,我将使用在React无限加载器加载页面序列。

var promises = [Promise.resolve()]; 函数methodThatReturnsAPromise(page) { 返回新的承诺((resolve, reject) => { setTimeout(() => { console.log(“解决- ${页面}!${new Date()} '); 解决(); }, 1000); }); } 函数pushPromise(page) { promises.push (promises.pop()。然后(function () { 返回methodThatReturnsAPromise(页面) })); } pushPromise (1); pushPromise (2); pushPromise (3);

使用ES2016的async/await(可能还有ES2018的一些特性),这可以简化为这样的形式:

function readFile(file) {
  ... // Returns a promise.
}

async function readFiles(files) {
  for (file in files) {
     await readFile(file)
  }
}

I haven't seen another answer express that simplicity. The OP said parallel execution of readFile was not desired. However, with IO like this it really makes sense to not be blocking on a single file read, while keeping the loop execution synchronous (you don't want to do the next step until all files have been read). Since I just learned about this and am a bit excited about it, I'll share that approach of parallel asynchronous execution of readFile with overall synchronous execution of readFiles.

async function readFiles(files) {
  await Promise.all(files.map(readFile))
}

这难道不是一件美好的事情吗?