我得到以下警告:

(node) warning: possible EventEmitter memory leak detected. 11 listeners added. Use emitter.setMaxListeners() to increase limit.
Trace: 
    at EventEmitter.<anonymous> (events.js:139:15)
    at EventEmitter.<anonymous> (node.js:385:29)
    at Server.<anonymous> (server.js:20:17)
    at Server.emit (events.js:70:17)
    at HTTPParser.onIncoming (http.js:1514:12)
    at HTTPParser.onHeadersComplete (http.js:102:31)
    at Socket.ondata (http.js:1410:22)
    at TCP.onread (net.js:354:27)

我在server.js中写了这样的代码:

http.createServer(
    function (req, res) { ... }).listen(3013);

如何解决这个问题?


当前回答

正如其他人所指出的那样,提高限额并不是最好的答案。我也面临着同样的问题,但在我的代码中,我没有使用任何事件侦听器。当我仔细研究代码时,我有时会创建很多承诺。每个承诺都有一些抓取所提供URL的代码(使用一些第三方库)。如果你正在做类似的事情,那么它可能是原因。

在使用ES6的Promise.all()时,限制并发性的最佳方法是什么?

其他回答

把它放在你的server.js(或任何包含你的主Node.js应用程序)的第一行:

需要.EventEmitter.prototype(“事件”)。_maxListeners = 0;

错误就消失了:)

这在节点eventEmitter文档中有解释

这是什么版本的Node ?你还有其他代码吗?这不是正常的行为。

简而言之,它:process.setMaxListeners(0);

另见:node.js - request -如何“emitter.setMaxListeners()”?

我也面临着同样的问题,但我已经成功地处理了异步等待。 请检查是否有帮助。 let dataLength = 25; 之前: for(设I = 0;i < dataLength;我+ +){ sftp。get (remotePath fs.createWriteStream (xyzProject / ${数据[我]. name})); } 后: for(设I = 0;i < dataLength;我+ +){ 等待sftp。get (remotePath fs.createWriteStream (xyzProject / ${数据[我]. name})); }

You said you are using process.on('uncaughtException', callback); Where are you executing this statement? Is it within the callback passed to http.createServer?If yes, different copy of the same callback will get attached to the uncaughtException event upon each new request, because the function (req, res) { ... } gets executed everytime a new request comes in and so will the statement process.on('uncaughtException', callback);Note that the process object is global to all your requests and adding listeners to its event everytime a new request comes in will not make any sense. You might not want such kind of behaviour. In case you want to attach a new listener for each new request, you should remove all previous listeners attached to the event as they no longer would be required using: process.removeAllListeners('uncaughtException');

我也有同样的问题。这个问题是因为我在两个监听器上监听端口8080。

setMaxListeners()工作得很好,但我不推荐它。

正确的方法是,检查你的代码额外的监听器,删除监听器或改变端口号,你正在监听,这解决了我的问题。