我得到以下警告:

(node) warning: possible EventEmitter memory leak detected. 11 listeners added. Use emitter.setMaxListeners() to increase limit.
Trace: 
    at EventEmitter.<anonymous> (events.js:139:15)
    at EventEmitter.<anonymous> (node.js:385:29)
    at Server.<anonymous> (server.js:20:17)
    at Server.emit (events.js:70:17)
    at HTTPParser.onIncoming (http.js:1514:12)
    at HTTPParser.onHeadersComplete (http.js:102:31)
    at Socket.ondata (http.js:1410:22)
    at TCP.onread (net.js:354:27)

我在server.js中写了这样的代码:

http.createServer(
    function (req, res) { ... }).listen(3013);

如何解决这个问题?


当前回答

You said you are using process.on('uncaughtException', callback); Where are you executing this statement? Is it within the callback passed to http.createServer?If yes, different copy of the same callback will get attached to the uncaughtException event upon each new request, because the function (req, res) { ... } gets executed everytime a new request comes in and so will the statement process.on('uncaughtException', callback);Note that the process object is global to all your requests and adding listeners to its event everytime a new request comes in will not make any sense. You might not want such kind of behaviour. In case you want to attach a new listener for each new request, you should remove all previous listeners attached to the event as they no longer would be required using: process.removeAllListeners('uncaughtException');

其他回答

这在节点eventEmitter文档中有解释

这是什么版本的Node ?你还有其他代码吗?这不是正常的行为。

简而言之,它:process.setMaxListeners(0);

另见:node.js - request -如何“emitter.setMaxListeners()”?

我也面临着同样的问题,但我已经成功地处理了异步等待。 请检查是否有帮助。 let dataLength = 25; 之前: for(设I = 0;i < dataLength;我+ +){ sftp。get (remotePath fs.createWriteStream (xyzProject / ${数据[我]. name})); } 后: for(设I = 0;i < dataLength;我+ +){ 等待sftp。get (remotePath fs.createWriteStream (xyzProject / ${数据[我]. name})); }

在我的情况下,这是由于没有关闭到数据库的Sequelize连接,而创建他们内部的异步函数调用setInterval。

节点版本号:v11.10.1

来自堆栈跟踪的警告消息:

process.on('warning', e => console.warn(e.stack));
(node:17905) MaxListenersExceededWarning: Possible EventEmitter memory leak detected. 11 wakeup listeners added. Use emitter.setMaxListeners() to increase limit
MaxListenersExceededWarning: Possible EventEmitter memory leak detected. 11 wakeup listeners added. Use emitter.setMaxListeners() to increase limit
    at _addListener (events.js:255:17)
    at Connection.addListener (events.js:271:10)
    at Connection.Readable.on (_stream_readable.js:826:35)
    at Connection.once (events.js:300:8)
    at Connection._send (/var/www/html/fleet-node-api/node_modules/http2/lib/protocol/connection.js:355:10)
    at processImmediate (timers.js:637:19)
    at process.topLevelDomainCallback (domain.js:126:23)

在搜索github问题,文档和创建类似的事件发射器内存泄漏后,由于node-apn模块用于iOS推送通知,观察到此问题。

这就解决了问题:

您应该为每个进程只创建一个Provider 您拥有的证书/密钥对。您不需要创建一个新的 每个通知的提供者。如果你只是发送通知 一个应用程序,那么就不需要一个以上的提供商。 如果你经常在你的应用程序中创建Provider实例,make 当你使用完每个提供者时,一定要调用provider .shutdown() 释放其资源和内存。

每次发送通知时,我都在创建提供者对象,并期望gc将其清除。

感谢RLaaa给了我一个如何解决警告的真正问题/根本原因的想法。在我的例子中,是MySQL有bug的代码。

假设你写了一个承诺,里面的代码是这样的:

pool.getConnection((err, conn) => {

  if(err) reject(err)

  const q = 'SELECT * from `a_table`'

  conn.query(q, [], (err, rows) => {

    conn.release()

    if(err) reject(err)

    // do something
  })

  conn.on('error', (err) => {

     reject(err)
  })
})

注意,代码中有一个conn.on('error')侦听器。代码一遍又一遍地添加监听器取决于调用查询的次数。 同时if(err) reject(err)做同样的事情。

所以我删除了conn.on('error')监听器,瞧…解决了! 希望这对你有所帮助。