Vim was always faster to start up than Emacs. I'm saying that on any machine, out-of-the-box installs of Vim will start up faster than out-of-the-box installs of Emacs. And I tend to think that after a moderate amount of customisation of either one, Vim will still start up faster than Emacs. After that, the other practical difference was Emacs' modes. They make your life tremendously easier when editing XML, C/C++/Java/whatever, LaTeX, and most popular languages you can think of. They make you want to keep the editor open for long sessions and work.

总而言之，我会说Vim让您使用它来完成简短、快速的编辑任务;而Emacs则鼓励您投入长时间的会话。

对我来说，emacs有更好的开发工具(不仅仅是基于标记的工具)。

Cedet（c/c++） Xrefactory（c/c++/java） 史莱姆（普通口齿） JDEE（java） 欧洲央行（代码浏览器） GDB 支持 NXML（xml）

Vim was always faster to start up than Emacs. I'm saying that on any machine, out-of-the-box installs of Vim will start up faster than out-of-the-box installs of Emacs. And I tend to think that after a moderate amount of customisation of either one, Vim will still start up faster than Emacs. After that, the other practical difference was Emacs' modes. They make your life tremendously easier when editing XML, C/C++/Java/whatever, LaTeX, and most popular languages you can think of. They make you want to keep the editor open for long sessions and work.

总而言之，我会说Vim让您使用它来完成简短、快速的编辑任务;而Emacs则鼓励您投入长时间的会话。

首先，Vi(原始实现)今天不使用。你说的是一些Vim推导。

要扩展Vim功能，必须重新编译Vim, Emacs则不必。

Emacs在self中有Vim (viper模式)。

Emacs通常需要手动安装，Vim通常预安装在所有Unix之类的操作系统上(但如果你有ssh访问主机的tramp模式win Vim:)。

如果你尝试Vim，那么你讨厌Emacs，所以先从Emacs开始。

也请阅读http://www.dina.dk/~abraham/religion/vi-tutorial.html(链接下拉，所以使用这个)

hxxp中的答案搜索://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Editor_war

我从vi开始，到emacs，然后到vim。我一直想试试Emacs，看看在过去五年中发生了什么变化。(说到IDE，我已经使用eclipse有一段时间了，但我更喜欢我的终端窗口连接我的mac和我(丈夫的)linux盒子)。

剪切粘贴的事最近一直困扰着我。在Vim中剪切和粘贴比在Emacs和IIRC中需要更多的步骤。从浏览器粘贴到终端窗口很烦人，除非你做了一些我不喜欢做的奇特的事情，所以我忍受了奇怪的缩进。我认为，在emacs中编辑多个文件更容易。如果两个文件都在屏幕上，至少可以从一个文件跳转到下一个文件。

我没有使用vi或emacs的花哨特性，因为我只是想开始编码的工作。我所需要的是漂亮的颜色和适当的制表符到空格的转换(对python尤其重要)。

我认为这完全取决于你是想使用:wq还是Ctrl-x Ctrl-s (IIRC)来保存文件，如果你不关心花哨的东西。

@mgb是正确的。一两个月前，我曾在Debian发行版中使用最低限度的linux来修复一些东西。Vi是唯一可用的编辑器。

Seems an answer has been selected already, but the big difference to me has always been the modal vs. non-modal. Vim is modal, which means that it makes optimizations based on a specific set of usage modes. At least that's how I've always looked at it. This makes using Vim a different experience because instead of having a work area that you type code in, you really are telling an environment to act on the text. This is why people say things like with Vim you really are learning a language. The :wq and :s/foo/bar is all part of a shell like environment that edits and reads text.

Emacs on the other hand is much closer to most editors/word processors/etc. you see today. You have a workspace that has a highly programmable interface. That is why you see things like email, irc, shells, etc. As a programmer it is easy to think in terms of saying "take the line number I'm on and do something with the information". The desire to leave the editor becomes less because instead of having to quit, open some other app/language and do things on some text, you have Emacs where you can do these things within the scope of your editor.

这两种观点并不一定是对立的，只是它们揭示了两个不同的焦点。就我个人而言，我使用Emacs，但我见过非常了解Vim的人，他们可以诚实地说，选择哪种并不重要。我首先尝试了Vim，但Emacs最终支持了我。的确，无论您选择什么，您都应该至少在一定程度上精通Vim，因为它总是可用的。