假设您在Java中有一个链表结构。它由节点组成:
class Node {
Node next;
// some user data
}
每个节点都指向下一个节点，除了最后一个节点，它的next为空。假设有一种可能性，列表可以包含一个循环-即最后的节点，而不是有一个空值，有一个引用到列表中它之前的一个节点。
最好的写作方式是什么
boolean hasLoop(Node first)
如果给定的节点是带有循环的列表的第一个，则返回true，否则返回false ?你怎么能写出一个常数的空间和合理的时间呢?
下面是一个带有循环的列表的图片:
当前回答
boolean hasCycle(Node head) {
boolean dec = false;
Node first = head;
Node sec = head;
while(first != null && sec != null)
{
first = first.next;
sec = sec.next.next;
if(first == sec )
{
dec = true;
break;
}
}
return dec;
}
使用上述函数在java中检测linkedlist中的循环。
其他回答
// To detect whether a circular loop exists in a linked list
public boolean findCircularLoop() {
Node slower, faster;
slower = head;
faster = head.next; // start faster one node ahead
while (true) {
// if the faster pointer encounters a NULL element
if (faster == null || faster.next == null)
return false;
// if faster pointer ever equals slower or faster's next
// pointer is ever equal to slower then it's a circular list
else if (slower == faster || slower == faster.next)
return true;
else {
// advance the pointers
slower = slower.next;
faster = faster.next.next;
}
}
}
这是我在java中的解决方案
boolean detectLoop(Node head){
Node fastRunner = head;
Node slowRunner = head;
while(fastRunner != null && slowRunner !=null && fastRunner.next != null){
fastRunner = fastRunner.next.next;
slowRunner = slowRunner.next;
if(fastRunner == slowRunner){
return true;
}
}
return false;
}
我可能会非常晚和新的处理这个线程。但还是. .
为什么不能将节点的地址和“下一个”节点指向存储在表中
如果我们可以这样做
node present: (present node addr) (next node address)
node 1: addr1: 0x100 addr2: 0x200 ( no present node address till this point had 0x200)
node 2: addr2: 0x200 addr3: 0x300 ( no present node address till this point had 0x300)
node 3: addr3: 0x300 addr4: 0x400 ( no present node address till this point had 0x400)
node 4: addr4: 0x400 addr5: 0x500 ( no present node address till this point had 0x500)
node 5: addr5: 0x500 addr6: 0x600 ( no present node address till this point had 0x600)
node 6: addr6: 0x600 addr4: 0x400 ( ONE present node address till this point had 0x400)
这样就形成了一个循环。
这段代码经过优化，将比选择的最佳答案更快地产生结果。这段代码避免了进入一个非常长的追逐向前和向后节点指针的过程，如果我们遵循'最佳答案'方法，在以下情况下将发生这种情况。看一下下面的演练，你就会明白我想说的是什么。然后通过下面给出的方法来观察问题，并测量否。为了找到答案所采取的步骤。
1 - > 2 - > 9 - > 3 ^ -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - ^
代码如下:
boolean loop(node *head)
{
node *back=head;
node *front=head;
while(front && front->next)
{
front=front->next->next;
if(back==front)
return true;
else
back=back->next;
}
return false
}
public boolean hasLoop(Node start){
TreeSet<Node> set = new TreeSet<Node>();
Node lookingAt = start;
while (lookingAt.peek() != null){
lookingAt = lookingAt.next;
if (set.contains(lookingAt){
return false;
} else {
set.put(lookingAt);
}
return true;
}
// Inside our Node class:
public Node peek(){
return this.next;
}
请原谅我的无知(我对Java和编程仍然相当陌生)，但为什么上面的方法不能工作呢?
I guess this doesn't solve the constant space issue... but it does at least get there in a reasonable time, correct? It will only take the space of the linked list plus the space of a set with n elements (where n is the number of elements in the linked list, or the number of elements until it reaches a loop). And for time, worst-case analysis, I think, would suggest O(nlog(n)). SortedSet look-ups for contains() are log(n) (check the javadoc, but I'm pretty sure TreeSet's underlying structure is TreeMap, whose in turn is a red-black tree), and in the worst case (no loops, or loop at very end), it will have to do n look-ups.
