加入这个派对有点晚了，但我喜欢在带有下游REST依赖的dotnet核心微服务的集成测试中尽可能使用wiremocking (https://github.com/WireMock-Net/WireMock.Net)。

通过实现一个扩展IHttpClientFactory的TestHttpClientFactory，我们可以重写这个方法

HttpClient CreateClient(字符串名称)

所以当你在应用中使用命名客户端时，你可以控制返回一个连接到你的wiremock的HttpClient。

这种方法的好处是，您不会更改正在测试的应用程序中的任何内容，并且允许课程集成测试对您的服务执行实际的REST请求，并模拟实际下游请求应该返回的json(或任何东西)。这将导致在应用程序中进行简洁的测试和尽可能少的模拟。

    public class TestHttpClientFactory : IHttpClientFactory 
{
    public HttpClient CreateClient(string name)
    {
        var httpClient = new HttpClient
        {
            BaseAddress = new Uri(G.Config.Get<string>($"App:Endpoints:{name}"))
            // G.Config is our singleton config access, so the endpoint 
            // to the running wiremock is used in the test
        };
        return httpClient;
    }
}

and

// in bootstrap of your Microservice
IHttpClientFactory factory = new TestHttpClientFactory();
container.Register<IHttpClientFactory>(factory);

受PointZeroTwo答案的启发，下面是一个使用NUnit和FakeItEasy的示例。

本例中的SystemUnderTest是您想要测试的类-没有为它提供示例内容，但我假设您已经有了它!

[TestFixture]
public class HttpClientTests
{
    private ISystemUnderTest _systemUnderTest;
    private HttpMessageHandler _mockMessageHandler;

    [SetUp]
    public void Setup()
    {
        _mockMessageHandler = A.Fake<HttpMessageHandler>();
        var httpClient = new HttpClient(_mockMessageHandler);

        _systemUnderTest = new SystemUnderTest(httpClient);
    }

    [Test]
    public void HttpError()
    {
        // Arrange
        A.CallTo(_mockMessageHandler)
            .Where(x => x.Method.Name == "SendAsync")
            .WithReturnType<Task<HttpResponseMessage>>()
            .Returns(Task.FromResult(new HttpResponseMessage
            {
                StatusCode = HttpStatusCode.InternalServerError,
                Content = new StringContent("abcd")
            }));

        // Act
        var result = _systemUnderTest.DoSomething();

        // Assert
        // Assert.AreEqual(...);
    }
}

我认为问题是你把它弄颠倒了。

public class AuroraClient : IAuroraClient
{
    private readonly HttpClient _client;

    public AuroraClient() : this(new HttpClientHandler())
    {
    }

    public AuroraClient(HttpMessageHandler messageHandler)
    {
        _client = new HttpClient(messageHandler);
    }
}

如果你看了上面的类，我想这就是你想要的。微软建议保持客户端活跃以获得最佳性能，因此这种类型的结构允许您这样做。而且HttpMessageHandler是一个抽象类，因此是可嘲笑的。你的测试方法看起来像这样:

[TestMethod]
public void TestMethod1()
{
    // Arrange
    var mockMessageHandler = new Mock<HttpMessageHandler>();
    // Set up your mock behavior here
    var auroraClient = new AuroraClient(mockMessageHandler.Object);
    // Act
    // Assert
}

这允许您在模拟HttpClient的行为时测试您的逻辑。

对不起，伙计们，在写完这篇文章并亲自尝试之后，我意识到您不能在HttpMessageHandler上模拟受保护的方法。我随后添加了以下代码，以允许注入适当的mock。

public interface IMockHttpMessageHandler
{
    Task<HttpResponseMessage> SendAsync(HttpRequestMessage request, CancellationToken cancellationToken);
}

public class MockHttpMessageHandler : HttpMessageHandler
{
    private readonly IMockHttpMessageHandler _realMockHandler;

    public MockHttpMessageHandler(IMockHttpMessageHandler realMockHandler)
    {
        _realMockHandler = realMockHandler;
    }

    protected override async Task<HttpResponseMessage> SendAsync(HttpRequestMessage request, CancellationToken cancellationToken)
    {
        return await _realMockHandler.SendAsync(request, cancellationToken);
    }
}

用它编写的测试看起来像下面这样:

[TestMethod]
public async Task GetProductsReturnsDeserializedXmlXopData()
{
    // Arrange
    var mockMessageHandler = new Mock<IMockHttpMessageHandler>();
    // Set up Mock behavior here.
    var client = new AuroraClient(new MockHttpMessageHandler(mockMessageHandler.Object));
    // Act
    // Assert
}

不要有一个包装器来创建一个新的HttpClient实例。如果您这样做，您将在运行时耗尽套接字(即使您正在处理HttpClient对象)。

如果使用MOQ，正确的做法是添加使用MOQ . protected;到您的测试，然后编写如下代码:

var response = new HttpResponseMessage(HttpStatusCode.OK)
{
    Content = new StringContent("It worked!")
};
var mockHttpMessageHandler = new Mock<HttpMessageHandler>();
mockHttpMessageHandler
    .Protected()
    .Setup<Task<HttpResponseMessage>>(
        "SendAsync",
        ItExpr.IsAny<HttpRequestMessage>(),
        ItExpr.IsAny<CancellationToken>())
    .ReturnsAsync(() => response);


var httpClient = new HttpClient(mockHttpMessageHandler.Object);

我做了一些非常简单的事情，因为我在一个依赖注入环境中。

public class HttpHelper : IHttpHelper
{
    private ILogHelper _logHelper;

    public HttpHelper(ILogHelper logHelper)
    {
        _logHelper = logHelper;
    }

    public virtual async Task<HttpResponseMessage> GetAsync(string uri, Dictionary<string, string> headers = null)
    {
        HttpResponseMessage response;
        using (var client = new HttpClient())
        {
            if (headers != null)
            {
                foreach (var h in headers)
                {
                    client.DefaultRequestHeaders.Add(h.Key, h.Value);
                }
            }
            response = await client.GetAsync(uri);
        }

        return response;
    }

    public async Task<T> GetAsync<T>(string uri, Dictionary<string, string> headers = null)
    {
        ...

        rawResponse = await GetAsync(uri, headers);

        ...
    }

}

这个笑话是:

    [TestInitialize]
    public void Initialize()
    {
       ...
        _httpHelper = new Mock<HttpHelper>(_logHelper.Object) { CallBase = true };
       ...
    }

    [TestMethod]
    public async Task SuccessStatusCode_WithAuthHeader()
    {
        ...

        _httpHelper.Setup(m => m.GetAsync(_uri, myHeaders)).Returns(
            Task<HttpResponseMessage>.Factory.StartNew(() =>
            {
                return new HttpResponseMessage(System.Net.HttpStatusCode.OK)
                {
                    Content = new StringContent(JsonConvert.SerializeObject(_testData))
                };
            })
        );
        var result = await _httpHelper.Object.GetAsync<TestDTO>(...);

        Assert.AreEqual(...);
    }

您的接口公开了具体的HttpClient类，因此任何使用该接口的类都被绑定到它，这意味着它不能被模拟。

HttpClient不继承任何接口，所以你必须自己编写。我建议使用类似装饰器的图案:

public interface IHttpHandler
{
    HttpResponseMessage Get(string url);
    HttpResponseMessage Post(string url, HttpContent content);
    Task<HttpResponseMessage> GetAsync(string url);
    Task<HttpResponseMessage> PostAsync(string url, HttpContent content);
}

你的类看起来是这样的:

public class HttpClientHandler : IHttpHandler
{
    private HttpClient _client = new HttpClient();

    public HttpResponseMessage Get(string url)
    {
        return GetAsync(url).Result;
    }

    public HttpResponseMessage Post(string url, HttpContent content)
    {
        return PostAsync(url, content).Result;
    }

    public async Task<HttpResponseMessage> GetAsync(string url)
    {
        return await _client.GetAsync(url);
    }

    public async Task<HttpResponseMessage> PostAsync(string url, HttpContent content)
    {
        return await _client.PostAsync(url, content);
    }
}

所有这些的重点是HttpClientHandler创建了它自己的HttpClient，然后你当然可以创建多个以不同方式实现IHttpHandler的类。

这种方法的主要问题是，你实际上是在编写一个只调用另一个类中的方法的类，然而你可以创建一个从HttpClient继承的类(参见Nkosi的例子，这是一个比我的方法更好的方法)。如果HttpClient有一个可以模拟的接口，事情会简单得多，不幸的是它没有。

This example is not the golden ticket however. IHttpHandler still relies on HttpResponseMessage, which belongs to System.Net.Http namespace, therefore if you do need other implementations other than HttpClient, you will have to perform some kind of mapping to convert their responses into HttpResponseMessage objects. This of course is only a problem if you need to use multiple implementations of IHttpHandler but it doesn't look like you do so it's not the end of the world, but it's something to think about.

无论如何，您可以简单地模拟IHttpHandler，而不必担心具体的HttpClient类，因为它已经被抽象掉了。

我建议测试非异步方法，因为这些方法仍然调用异步方法，但不必担心单元测试异步方法的麻烦，参见这里