是否有可能终止一个正在运行的线程而不设置/检查任何标志/信号/等等?
当前回答
最简单的方法是:
from threading import Thread
from time import sleep
def do_something():
global thread_work
while thread_work:
print('doing something')
sleep(5)
print('Thread stopped')
thread_work = True
Thread(target=do_something).start()
sleep(5)
thread_work = False
其他回答
多处理。进程可以p.terminate()
如果我想杀死一个线程,但不想使用标志/锁/信号/信号量/事件/任何东西,我就把线程提升到完整的进程。对于只使用几个线程的代码,开销并没有那么糟糕。
例如,这可以方便地终止执行阻塞I/O的助手“线程”
转换很简单:在相关代码中替换所有线程。多线程线程。进程和所有队列。多处理队列。排队并将p.t terminate()所需的调用添加到想要杀死子进程p的父进程中
关于多处理,请参阅Python文档。
例子:
import multiprocessing
proc = multiprocessing.Process(target=your_proc_function, args=())
proc.start()
# Terminate the process
proc.terminate() # sends a SIGTERM
实现一个线程是绝对可能的。方法,如下例代码所示:
import sys
import threading
import time
class StopThread(StopIteration):
pass
threading.SystemExit = SystemExit, StopThread
class Thread2(threading.Thread):
def stop(self):
self.__stop = True
def _bootstrap(self):
if threading._trace_hook is not None:
raise ValueError('Cannot run thread with tracing!')
self.__stop = False
sys.settrace(self.__trace)
super()._bootstrap()
def __trace(self, frame, event, arg):
if self.__stop:
raise StopThread()
return self.__trace
class Thread3(threading.Thread):
def _bootstrap(self, stop_thread=False):
def stop():
nonlocal stop_thread
stop_thread = True
self.stop = stop
def tracer(*_):
if stop_thread:
raise StopThread()
return tracer
sys.settrace(tracer)
super()._bootstrap()
###############################################################################
def main():
test1 = Thread2(target=printer)
test1.start()
time.sleep(1)
test1.stop()
test1.join()
test2 = Thread2(target=speed_test)
test2.start()
time.sleep(1)
test2.stop()
test2.join()
test3 = Thread3(target=speed_test)
test3.start()
time.sleep(1)
test3.stop()
test3.join()
def printer():
while True:
print(time.time() % 1)
time.sleep(0.1)
def speed_test(count=0):
try:
while True:
count += 1
except StopThread:
print('Count =', count)
if __name__ == '__main__':
main()
Thread3类运行代码的速度似乎比Thread2类快大约33%。
您可以在进程中执行命令,然后使用进程id终止它。 我需要在两个线程之间同步,其中一个线程本身不返回。
processIds = []
def executeRecord(command):
print(command)
process = subprocess.Popen(command, stdout=subprocess.PIPE)
processIds.append(process.pid)
print(processIds[0])
#Command that doesn't return by itself
process.stdout.read().decode("utf-8")
return;
def recordThread(command, timeOut):
thread = Thread(target=executeRecord, args=(command,))
thread.start()
thread.join(timeOut)
os.kill(processIds.pop(), signal.SIGINT)
return;
如果您确实需要终止子任务的能力,请使用另一种实现。Multiprocessing和gevent都支持不加选择地杀死一个“线程”。
Python的线程不支持取消。不要尝试。你的代码很可能死锁、损坏或泄漏内存,或者有其他意想不到的“有趣的”难以调试的效果,这种情况很少发生,而且不确定。
在Python和任何语言中,突然终止线程通常都是一种糟糕的模式。考虑以下情况:
线程持有一个必须正确关闭的关键资源 线程创建了其他几个线程,这些线程也必须被杀死。
如果你能负担得起(如果你在管理自己的线程),处理这个问题的好方法是有一个exit_request标志,每个线程都会定期检查它,看看它是否到了退出的时候。
例如:
import threading
class StoppableThread(threading.Thread):
"""Thread class with a stop() method. The thread itself has to check
regularly for the stopped() condition."""
def __init__(self, *args, **kwargs):
super(StoppableThread, self).__init__(*args, **kwargs)
self._stop_event = threading.Event()
def stop(self):
self._stop_event.set()
def stopped(self):
return self._stop_event.is_set()
在这段代码中,当您希望线程退出时,应该在线程上调用stop(),并使用join()等待线程正确退出。线程应该定期检查停止标志。
然而,在某些情况下,您确实需要终止一个线程。例如,当您正在包装一个外部库时,该库正忙于长时间的调用,并且您希望中断它。
下面的代码允许(有一些限制)在Python线程中引发异常:
def _async_raise(tid, exctype):
'''Raises an exception in the threads with id tid'''
if not inspect.isclass(exctype):
raise TypeError("Only types can be raised (not instances)")
res = ctypes.pythonapi.PyThreadState_SetAsyncExc(ctypes.c_long(tid),
ctypes.py_object(exctype))
if res == 0:
raise ValueError("invalid thread id")
elif res != 1:
# "if it returns a number greater than one, you're in trouble,
# and you should call it again with exc=NULL to revert the effect"
ctypes.pythonapi.PyThreadState_SetAsyncExc(ctypes.c_long(tid), None)
raise SystemError("PyThreadState_SetAsyncExc failed")
class ThreadWithExc(threading.Thread):
'''A thread class that supports raising an exception in the thread from
another thread.
'''
def _get_my_tid(self):
"""determines this (self's) thread id
CAREFUL: this function is executed in the context of the caller
thread, to get the identity of the thread represented by this
instance.
"""
if not self.isAlive():
raise threading.ThreadError("the thread is not active")
# do we have it cached?
if hasattr(self, "_thread_id"):
return self._thread_id
# no, look for it in the _active dict
for tid, tobj in threading._active.items():
if tobj is self:
self._thread_id = tid
return tid
# TODO: in python 2.6, there's a simpler way to do: self.ident
raise AssertionError("could not determine the thread's id")
def raiseExc(self, exctype):
"""Raises the given exception type in the context of this thread.
If the thread is busy in a system call (time.sleep(),
socket.accept(), ...), the exception is simply ignored.
If you are sure that your exception should terminate the thread,
one way to ensure that it works is:
t = ThreadWithExc( ... )
...
t.raiseExc( SomeException )
while t.isAlive():
time.sleep( 0.1 )
t.raiseExc( SomeException )
If the exception is to be caught by the thread, you need a way to
check that your thread has caught it.
CAREFUL: this function is executed in the context of the
caller thread, to raise an exception in the context of the
thread represented by this instance.
"""
_async_raise( self._get_my_tid(), exctype )
(根据Tomer Filiba的《Killable Threads》改编。关于PyThreadState_SetAsyncExc返回值的引用似乎来自旧版本的Python。)
正如文档中所指出的,这不是一个神奇的子弹,因为如果线程在Python解释器之外忙,它将不会捕获中断。
这段代码的一个良好使用模式是让线程捕获特定的异常并执行清理。这样,您可以中断任务,但仍然可以进行适当的清理。
推荐文章
- 如何禁用标准错误流的日志记录?
- 用Matplotlib在Python中绘制时间
- 类中的Python装饰器
- 在Python中锁定文件
- 得到熊猫栏目的总数
- 从pandas DataFrame中删除名称包含特定字符串的列
- Mock vs MagicMock
- 如何阅读一个。xlsx文件使用熊猫库在iPython?
- 如何访问熊猫组由数据帧按键
- Pandas和NumPy+SciPy在Python中的区别是什么?
- 将列表转换为集合会改变元素的顺序
- 如何在matplotlib更新一个情节
- TypeError: ` NoneType `对象在Python中不可迭代
- 如何在Vim注释掉一个Python代码块
- python标准库中的装饰符(特别是@deprecated)