对我来说，Criteria最大的优势是示例API，在这里你可以传递一个对象，hibernate将基于这些对象属性构建一个查询。

除此之外，标准API也有它的怪癖(我相信hibernate团队正在重做API)，比如:

a criteria.createAlias("obj")强制使用内部连接而不是可能的外部连接 您不能两次创建相同的别名 有些SQL子句没有简单的对应条件(比如子选择) 等。

当我想要类似于sql的查询时，我倾向于使用HQL(从用户中删除status='blocked')，当我不想使用字符串追加时，我倾向于使用标准。

HQL的另一个优点是您可以预先定义所有的查询，甚至可以将它们外部化到一个文件中。

HQL和criteriaQuery在性能上是有区别的，每次你使用criteriaQuery发起查询时，它会为表名创建一个新的别名，这个别名不会反映在任何DB的最后一个查询缓存中。这会导致编译生成的SQL的开销，需要更多的时间来执行。

关于抓取策略[http://www.hibernate.org/315.html]

Criteria respects the laziness settings in your mappings and guarantees that what you want loaded is loaded. This means one Criteria query might result in several SQL immediate SELECT statements to fetch the subgraph with all non-lazy mapped associations and collections. If you want to change the "how" and even the "what", use setFetchMode() to enable or disable outer join fetching for a particular collection or association. Criteria queries also completely respect the fetching strategy (join vs select vs subselect). HQL respects the laziness settings in your mappings and guarantees that what you want loaded is loaded. This means one HQL query might result in several SQL immediate SELECT statements to fetch the subgraph with all non-lazy mapped associations and collections. If you want to change the "how" and even the "what", use LEFT JOIN FETCH to enable outer-join fetching for a particular collection or nullable many-to-one or one-to-one association, or JOIN FETCH to enable inner join fetching for a non-nullable many-to-one or one-to-one association. HQL queries do not respect any fetch="join" defined in the mapping document.

We used mainly Criteria in our application in the beginning but after it was replaced with HQL due to the performance issues. Mainly we are using very complex queries with several joins which leads to multiple queries in Criteria but is very optimized in HQL. The case is that we use just several propeties on specific object and not complete objects. With Criteria the problem was also string concatenation. Let say if you need to display name and surname of the user in HQL it is quite easy (name || ' ' || surname) but in Crteria this is not possible. To overcome this we used ResultTransormers, where there were methods where such concatenation was implemented for needed result. Today we mainly use HQL like this:

String hql = "select " +
            "c.uuid as uuid," +
            "c.name as name," +
            "c.objective as objective," +
            "c.startDate as startDate," +
            "c.endDate as endDate," +
            "c.description as description," +
            "s.status as status," +
            "t.type as type " +
            "from " + Campaign.class.getName() + " c " +
            "left join c.type t " +
            "left join c.status s";

Query query =  hibernateTemplate.getSessionFactory().getCurrentSession().getSession(EntityMode.MAP).createQuery(hql);
query.setResultTransformer(Transformers.ALIAS_TO_ENTITY_MAP);
return query.list();

因此，在本例中，返回的记录是所需属性的映射。

还有另一种方法。我最终创建了一个基于hibernate原始语法的HQL解析器，这样它就可以首先解析HQL，然后动态地注入动态参数或自动为HQL查询添加一些通用过滤器。效果很好!

标准API

Criteria API更适合动态生成查询。因此，如果您想添加WHERE子句过滤器、JOIN子句，或者改变ORDER BY子句或投影列，Criteria API可以帮助您以一种防止SQL注入攻击的方式动态生成查询。

另一方面，Criteria查询表达能力较差，甚至可能导致非常复杂和低效的SQL查询。

JPQL和HQL

JPQL是JPA标准实体查询语言，而HQL扩展了JPQL并添加了一些特定于hibernate的特性。

JPQL和HQL非常具有表现力，并且类似于SQL。与Criteria API不同，JPQL和HQL可以很容易地预测JPA提供者生成的底层SQL查询。复查HQL查询也比Criteria查询容易得多。

值得注意的是，如果需要修改实体，选择使用JPQL或Criteria API的实体是有意义的。否则，DTO投影是更好的选择。

结论

如果不需要改变实体查询结构，则使用JPQL或HQL。如果需要更改过滤或排序标准或更改投影，则使用criteria API。

然而，仅仅因为您正在使用JPA或Hibernate，这并不意味着您不应该使用本机SQL。SQL查询非常有用，JPQL和Criteria API不是SQL的替代品。

对于动态条件查询，我们可以根据我们的输入构造查询..在Hql查询是静态查询的情况下，一旦我们构造，我们就不能改变查询的结构。