一位面试官最近问了我这样一个问题:给定三个布尔变量a、b和c，如果三个变量中至少有两个为真，则返回true。
我的解决方案如下:
boolean atLeastTwo(boolean a, boolean b, boolean c) {
if ((a && b) || (b && c) || (a && c)) {
return true;
}
else{
return false;
}
}
他说这还可以进一步改进，但如何改进呢?
当前回答
我认为最简单的解决方法是:
返回(a && b) || c;
其他回答
One thing I haven't seen others point out is that a standard thing to do in the "please write me some code" section of the job interview is to say "Could you improve that?" or "Are you completely happy with that" or "is that as optimized as possible?" when you say you are done. It's possible you heard "how would you improve that" as "this might be improved; how?". In this case changing the if(x) return true; else return false; idiom to just return x is an improvement - but be aware that there are times they just want to see how you react to the question. I have heard that some interviewers will insist there is a flaw in perfect code just to see how you cope with it.
供你参考，这只是一个完整加法器的执行部分。在硬件中，您可以根据不同的布尔表达式使用逻辑工作来确定最佳电路。我猜传统的异或解决方案要比海报上展示的不那么简洁的表达式花费更多的精力。
它应该是:
(a || b && c) && (b || c && a)
此外，如果true自动转换为1,false自动转换为0:
(a + b*c) * (b + c*a) > 0
只是为了使用异或来回答一个相对简单的问题……
return a ^ b ? c : a
这个问题的非约简解是:
a'bc + abc' + abc + ab'c
减少使用k - map，可以得到:
bc + ab + ac
可以通过在a'bc和abc' minterms上使用exclusive或，并结合abc和ab'c minterms来进一步减少此值:
b(a ^ c) + ac
