一位面试官最近问了我这样一个问题:给定三个布尔变量a、b和c，如果三个变量中至少有两个为真，则返回true。
我的解决方案如下:
boolean atLeastTwo(boolean a, boolean b, boolean c) {
if ((a && b) || (b && c) || (a && c)) {
return true;
}
else{
return false;
}
}
他说这还可以进一步改进，但如何改进呢?
当前回答
我找到了这个解。
boolean atLeastTwo(boolean a, boolean b, boolean c) {
bool result = !(a ^ b ^ c) && !(!a & !b & !c) || (a & b & c);
return result;
}
其他回答
另一个直接代码的例子:
int n = 0;
if (a) n++;
if (b) n++;
if (c) n++;
return (n >= 2);
显然，这不是最简洁的代码。
齿顶高
另一个(稍微优化的)版本:
int n = -2;
if (a) n++;
if (b) n++;
if (c) n++;
return (n >= 0);
这可能会运行得稍微快一点，假设与0的比较将比与2的比较使用更快(或更少)的代码。
这样读起来更好:
if (a) {
return b || c;
}
else {
return b && c;
}
boolean atLeastTwo(boolean a, boolean b, boolean c)
{
return ((a && b) || (b && c) || (a && c));
}
当然，这个问题更多的是关于你如何解决问题/思考，而不是你实际的编码能力。
一个稍微简洁一点的版本可能是
返回((a ^ b) && (b ^ c)) ^ b
但就像之前的一个帖子说的，如果我在任何我正在编写的代码中看到这个，有人会听到很多。：）
One thing I haven't seen others point out is that a standard thing to do in the "please write me some code" section of the job interview is to say "Could you improve that?" or "Are you completely happy with that" or "is that as optimized as possible?" when you say you are done. It's possible you heard "how would you improve that" as "this might be improved; how?". In this case changing the if(x) return true; else return false; idiom to just return x is an improvement - but be aware that there are times they just want to see how you react to the question. I have heard that some interviewers will insist there is a flaw in perfect code just to see how you cope with it.
