类只能继承自一个基类，因此如果您想使用抽象类为一组类提供多态性，它们必须全部继承自该类。抽象类也可以提供已经实现的成员。因此，您可以使用抽象类确保一定数量的相同功能，但不能使用接口。

下面是一些建议，可以帮助您决定是使用接口还是抽象类为组件提供多态性。

If you anticipate creating multiple versions of your component, create an abstract class. Abstract classes provide a simple and easy way to version your components. By updating the base class, all inheriting classes are automatically updated with the change. Interfaces, on the other hand, cannot be changed once created in that way. If a new version of an interface is required, you must create a whole new interface. If the functionality you are creating will be useful across a wide range of disparate objects, use an interface. Abstract classes should be used primarily for objects that are closely related, whereas interfaces are best suited for providing common functionality to unrelated classes. If you are designing small, concise bits of functionality, use interfaces. If you are designing large functional units, use an abstract class. If you want to provide common, implemented functionality among all implementations of your component, use an abstract class. Abstract classes allow you to partially implement your class, whereas interfaces contain no implementation for any members.

抄袭: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/scsyfw1d%28v=vs.71%29.aspx

答案因语言而异。例如，在Java中，一个类可以实现(继承)多个接口，但只能继承一个抽象类。所以接口给了你更多的灵活性。但在c++中却不是这样。

抽象类可以具有共享的状态或功能。接口只是提供状态或功能的承诺。一个好的抽象类可以减少必须重写的代码量，因为它的功能或状态可以共享。接口没有可共享的已定义信息

在Java中，您可以从一个(抽象)类继承来“提供”功能，并且可以实现许多接口来“确保”功能

类只能继承自一个基类，因此如果您想使用抽象类为一组类提供多态性，它们必须全部继承自该类。抽象类也可以提供已经实现的成员。因此，您可以使用抽象类确保一定数量的相同功能，但不能使用接口。

下面是一些建议，可以帮助您决定是使用接口还是抽象类为组件提供多态性。

If you anticipate creating multiple versions of your component, create an abstract class. Abstract classes provide a simple and easy way to version your components. By updating the base class, all inheriting classes are automatically updated with the change. Interfaces, on the other hand, cannot be changed once created in that way. If a new version of an interface is required, you must create a whole new interface. If the functionality you are creating will be useful across a wide range of disparate objects, use an interface. Abstract classes should be used primarily for objects that are closely related, whereas interfaces are best suited for providing common functionality to unrelated classes. If you are designing small, concise bits of functionality, use interfaces. If you are designing large functional units, use an abstract class. If you want to provide common, implemented functionality among all implementations of your component, use an abstract class. Abstract classes allow you to partially implement your class, whereas interfaces contain no implementation for any members.

抄袭: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/scsyfw1d%28v=vs.71%29.aspx

我为此写了一篇文章:

抽象类和接口

总结:

当我们谈论抽象类时，我们是在定义对象类型的特征;指定对象是什么。

当我们谈论接口和定义我们承诺提供的功能时，我们谈论的是建立一个关于对象可以做什么的契约。