我想给出一个例子，而不是正式的定义。

var originalObject = { 
    a : 1, 
    b : 2, 
    c : 3,
};

这段代码显示了一个浅拷贝:

var copyObject1 = originalObject;

console.log(copyObject1.a);         // it will print 1 
console.log(originalObject.a);       // it will also print 1 
copyObject1.a = 4; 
console.log(copyObject1.a);           //now it will print 4 
console.log(originalObject.a);       // now it will also print 4

var copyObject2 = Object.assign({}, originalObject);

console.log(copyObject2.a);        // it will print 1 
console.log(originalObject.a);      // it will also print 1 
copyObject2.a = 4; 
console.log(copyObject2.a);        // now it will print 4 
console.log(originalObject.a);      // now it will print 1

这段代码显示了一个深度拷贝:

var copyObject2 = Object.assign({}, originalObject);

console.log(copyObject2.a);        // it will print 1 
console.log(originalObject.a);      // it will also print 1 
copyObject2.a = 4; 
console.log(copyObject2.a);        // now it will print 4 
console.log(originalObject.a);      // !! now it will print 1 !!

浅复制-原始和浅复制对象中的引用变量引用公共对象。

深度复制-原始和深度复制对象中的引用变量引用不同的对象。

克隆总是做浅拷贝。

public class Language implements Cloneable{
    
    String name;
    public Language(String name){
        this.name=name;
    }
    
    public String getName() {
        return name;
    }
    
    @Override
    protected Object clone() throws CloneNotSupportedException {
        return super.clone();
    }
}

主类如下-

public static void main(String args[]) throws ClassNotFoundException, CloneNotSupportedException{

      ArrayList<Language> list=new ArrayList<Language>();
      list.add(new Language("C"));
      list.add(new Language("JAVA"));

      ArrayList<Language> shallow=(ArrayList<Language>) list.clone();
      //We used here clone since this always shallow copied.

      System.out.println(list==shallow);
      
      for(int i=0;i<list.size();i++)
      System.out.println(list.get(i)==shallow.get(i));//true
      
      ArrayList<Language> deep=new ArrayList<Language>();
      for(Language language:list){
          deep.add((Language) language.clone());
      }
      System.out.println(list==deep);
      for(int i=0;i<list.size();i++)
          System.out.println(list.get(i)==deep.get(i));//false
      
} 

以上输出为-

假真假真 假假假

原始物体的任何变化都将反映在浅物体上，而不是在深物体上。

  list.get(0).name="ViSuaLBaSiC";
  System.out.println(shallow.get(0).getName()+"  "+deep.get(0).getName());

输出- ViSuaLBaSiC C

尤其是iOS开发者:

如果B是a的浅拷贝，那么对于原语数据，它就像B = [a assign];对于对象，B = [A retain];

B和A指向同一个内存位置

如果B是a的深层副本，则B = [a copy];

B和A指向不同的内存位置

B的内存地址与A的相同

B和A的含量相同

{想象两个对象:相同类型_t的A和B(相对于c++)，你正在考虑将A浅/深复制到B}

浅拷贝: 简单地将a的引用复制到b中，把它看作是a的地址的副本。 因此，A和B的地址将是相同的，即它们将指向相同的内存位置，即数据内容。

Deep copy: Simply makes a copy of all the members of A, allocates memory in a different location for B and then assigns the copied members to B to achieve deep copy. In this way, if A becomes non-existant B is still valid in the memory. The correct term to use would be cloning, where you know that they both are totally the same, but yet different (i.e. stored as two different entities in the memory space). You can also provide your clone wrapper where you can decide via inclusion/exclusion list which properties to select during deep copy. This is quite a common practice when you create APIs.

只有当你了解其中的利害关系时，你才可以选择做浅拷贝。当你在c++或C中有大量的指针要处理时，做一个对象的浅拷贝真的是一个坏主意。

EXAMPLE_OF_DEEP COPY_ An example is, when you are trying to do image processing and object recognition you need to mask "Irrelevant and Repetitive Motion" out of your processing areas. If you are using image pointers, then you might have the specification to save those mask images. NOW... if you do a shallow copy of the image, when the pointer references are KILLED from the stack, you lost the reference and its copy i.e. there will be a runtime error of access violation at some point. In this case, what you need is a deep copy of your image by CLONING it. In this way you can retrieve the masks in case you need them in the future.

EXAMPLE_OF_SHALLOW_COPY I am not extremely knowledgeable compared to the users in StackOverflow so feel free to delete this part and put a good example if you can clarify. But I really think it is not a good idea to do shallow copy if you know that your program is gonna run for an infinite period of time i.e. continuous "push-pop" operation over the stack with function calls. If you are demonstrating something to an amateur or novice person (e.g. C/C++ tutorial stuff) then it is probably okay. But if you are running an application such as surveillance and detection system, or Sonar Tracking System, you are not supposed to keep shallow copying your objects around because it will kill your program sooner or later.

struct sample
{
    char * ptr;
}
void shallowcpy(sample & dest, sample & src)
{
    dest.ptr=src.ptr;
}
void deepcpy(sample & dest, sample & src)
{
    dest.ptr=malloc(strlen(src.ptr)+1);
    memcpy(dest.ptr,src.ptr);
}

摘自[博客]:http://sickprogrammersarea.blogspot.in/2014/03/technical-interview-questions-on-c_6.html

深度复制涉及使用一个对象的内容创建同一类的另一个实例。在深度复制中，两个对象可能包含相同的信息，但目标对象将有自己的缓冲区和资源。任何一个对象的销毁都不会影响剩下的对象。重载赋值操作符将创建对象的深层副本。

浅拷贝包括将一个对象的内容复制到同类的另一个实例中，从而创建镜像。由于直接复制引用和指针，这两个对象将共享另一个对象的相同外部包含内容，这是不可预测的。

解释:

Using a copy constructor we simply copy the data values member by member. This method of copying is called shallow copy. If the object is a simple class, comprised of built in types and no pointers this would be acceptable. This function would use the values and the objects and its behavior would not be altered with a shallow copy, only the addresses of pointers that are members are copied and not the value the address is pointing to. The data values of the object would then be inadvertently altered by the function. When the function goes out of scope, the copy of the object with all its data is popped off the stack.

如果对象有任何指针，则需要执行深度复制。对于对象的深层拷贝，在自由存储区中为对象分配内存，并复制指向的元素。深度拷贝用于函数返回的对象。