你应该记住……

contructor()

constructor(a:any, b:any, c:any)

它和new()或者new("a"，"b"，"c")一样

Thus

constructor(a?:any, b?:any, c?:any)

和上面一样，而且更灵活…

新()或新的(“a”)或(“a”、“b”)或新(“a”、“b”、“c”)

注意，你也可以通过TypeScript中的默认参数来解决在实现级别上缺乏重载的问题，例如:

interface IBox {    
    x : number;
    y : number;
    height : number;
    width : number;
}

class Box {
    public x: number;
    public y: number;
    public height: number;
    public width: number;

    constructor(obj : IBox = {x:0,y:0, height:0, width:0}) {    
        this.x = obj.x;
        this.y = obj.y;
        this.height = obj.height;
        this.width = obj.width;
    }   
}

编辑: 截至2016年12月5日，请参阅本森的回答，以获得更灵活的更详细的解决方案。

interface IBox {
    x: number;
    y: number;
    height: number;
    width: number;
}

class Box {
    public x: number;
    public y: number;
    public height: number;
    public width: number;

    constructor(obj: IBox) {
        const { x, y, height, width } = { x: 0, y: 0, height: 0, width: 0, ...obj }
        this.x = x;
        this.y = y;
        this.height = height;
        this.width = width;
    }
}

你应该记住……

contructor()

constructor(a:any, b:any, c:any)

它和new()或者new("a"，"b"，"c")一样

Thus

constructor(a?:any, b?:any, c?:any)

和上面一样，而且更灵活…

新()或新的(“a”)或(“a”、“b”)或新(“a”、“b”、“c”)

我使用以下替代方法来获得默认/可选参数和“kind-of-overloaded”的构造函数，参数数量可变:

private x?: number;
private y?: number;

constructor({x = 10, y}: {x?: number, y?: number}) {
 this.x = x;
 this.y = y;
}

我知道这不是最漂亮的代码，但人们会习惯它。不需要额外的接口，它允许私有成员，这在使用接口时是不可能的。

As commented in @Benson answer, I used this example in my code and I found it very useful. However I found with the Object is possibly 'undefined'.ts(2532) error when I tried to make calculations with my class variable types, as the question mark leads them to be of type AssignedType | undefined. Even if undefined case is handled in later execution or with the compiler type enforce <AssignedType> I could not get rid of the error, so could not make the args optional.I solved creating a separated type for the arguments with the question mark params and the class variables without the question marks. Verbose, but worked.

下面是原始代码，给出了类方法()中的错误，如下所示:

/** @class */

class Box {
  public x?: number;
  public y?: number;
  public height?: number;
  public width?: number;

  // The Box class can work double-duty as the interface here since they are identical
  // If you choose to add methods or modify this class, you will need to
  // define and reference a new interface for the incoming parameters object 
  // e.g.:  `constructor(params: BoxObjI = {} as BoxObjI)` 
  constructor(params: Box = {} as Box) {
    // Define the properties of the incoming `params` object here. 
    // Setting a default value with the `= 0` syntax is optional for each parameter
    const {
      x = 0,
      y = 0,
      height = 1,
      width = 1,
    } = params;

    //  If needed, make the parameters publicly accessible
    //  on the class ex.: 'this.var = var'.
    /**  Use jsdoc comments here for inline ide auto-documentation */
    this.x = x;
    this.y = y;
    this.height = height;
    this.width = width;
  }

  method(): void {
    const total = this.x + 1; // ERROR. Object is possibly 'undefined'.ts(2532)
  }
}

const box1 = new Box();
const box2 = new Box({});
const box3 = new Box({ x: 0 });
const box4 = new Box({ x: 0, height: 10 });
const box5 = new Box({ x: 0, y: 87, width: 4, height: 0 });

所以变量不能在类方法中使用。 如果像这样纠正，例如:

method(): void {
    const total = <number> this.x + 1;
}

现在出现这个错误:

Argument of type '{ x: number; y: number; width: number; height: number; }' is not 
assignable to parameter of type 'Box'.
Property 'method' is missing in type '{ x: number; y: number; width: number; height: 
number; }' but required in type 'Box'.ts(2345)

好像整个arguments bundle不再是可选的了。

因此，如果创建了带有可选参数的类型，并且从可选参数中删除了类变量，我就实现了我想要的，参数是可选的，并且能够在类方法中使用它们。下面是解决方案代码:

type BoxParams = {
  x?: number;
  y?: number;
  height?: number;
  width?: number;
}

/** @class */
class Box {
  public x: number;
  public y: number;
  public height: number;
  public width: number;

  // The Box class can work double-duty as the interface here since they are identical
  // If you choose to add methods or modify this class, you will need to
  // define and reference a new interface for the incoming parameters object 
  // e.g.:  `constructor(params: BoxObjI = {} as BoxObjI)` 
  constructor(params: BoxParams = {} as BoxParams) {
    // Define the properties of the incoming `params` object here. 
    // Setting a default value with the `= 0` syntax is optional for each parameter
    const {
      x = 0,
      y = 0,
      height = 1,
      width = 1,
    } = params;

    //  If needed, make the parameters publicly accessible
    //  on the class ex.: 'this.var = var'.
    /**  Use jsdoc comments here for inline ide auto-documentation */
    this.x = x;
    this.y = y;
    this.height = height;
    this.width = width;
  }

  method(): void {
    const total = this.x + 1;
  }
}

const box1 = new Box();
const box2 = new Box({});
const box3 = new Box({ x: 0 });
const box4 = new Box({ x: 0, height: 10 });
const box5 = new Box({ x: 0, y: 87, width: 4, height: 0 });

感谢任何花时间阅读并试图理解我想要表达的观点的人的评论。

提前谢谢你。