cat dump.txt | head -16224 | tail -258

应该能行。这种方法的缺点是，您需要做算术来确定tail的参数，并考虑是否希望“between”包含结束行。

我已经为sed、perl、head+tail和我自己的awk代码编译了一些最高评级的解决方案，并通过管道关注性能，同时使用LC_ALL=C确保所有候选程序以尽可能快的速度运行，并在两者之间分配2秒的睡眠间隔。

差距是显而易见的:

   abs time    awk/app speed ratio
 ----------------------------------
   0.0672 sec :   1.00x mawk-2
   0.0839 sec :   1.25x gnu-sed
   0.1289 sec :   1.92x perl
   0.2151 sec :   3.20x gnu-head+tail

还没有机会测试这些工具的python或BSD变体。

 (fg && fg && fg && fg) 2>/dev/null; 
 echo;
 ( time ( pvE0 < "${m3t}" 
        | LC_ALL=C  mawk2 '

           BEGIN {  
                     _=10420001-(\
                    __=10420256)^(FS="^$") 
           } _<NR { 
                   print

                   if(__==NR) { exit } 
     
     }' ) | pvE9) | tee >(xxh128sum >&2) | LC_ALL=C gwc -lcm | lgp3 ; 
    sleep 2;
    (fg && fg && fg && fg) 2>/dev/null
    echo; 
    ( time ( pvE0 < "${m3t}" 
           | LC_ALL=C gsed -n '10420001,10420256p;10420256q' 
    
     ) | pvE9 ) |  tee >(xxh128sum >&2) |  LC_ALL=C gwc -lcm  | lgp3 ;
     sleep  2; (fg && fg && fg && fg) 2>/dev/null
     echo
    ( time ( pvE0 < "${m3t}" 
           | LC_ALL=C perl -ne 'print if 10420001..10420256'
    
    ) | pvE9 ) |  tee >(xxh128sum >&2) |  LC_ALL=C gwc -lcm | lgp3 ;
    sleep  2; (fg && fg && fg && fg) 2>/dev/null
    echo
    ( time ( pvE0 < "${m3t}" 
           | LC_ALL=C ghead -n +10420256 
           | LC_ALL=C gtail -n +10420001 
    ) | pvE9 ) |  tee >(xxh128sum >&2) |  LC_ALL=C gwc -lcm  | lgp3 ; 


      in0: 1.51GiB 0:00:00 [2.31GiB/s] [2.31GiB/s] [============> ] 81%            
     out9: 42.5KiB 0:00:00 [64.9KiB/s] [64.9KiB/s] [ <=> ]
( pvE 0.1 in0 < "${m3t}" | LC_ALL=C mawk2 ; )
     
   0.43s user 0.36s system 117% cpu 0.672 total
    256   43487   43487

54313365c2e66a48dc1dc33595716cc8  stdin

     out9: 42.5KiB 0:00:00 [51.7KiB/s] [51.7KiB/s] [ <=> ]
      in0: 1.51GiB 0:00:00 [1.84GiB/s] [1.84GiB/s] [==========> ] 81%            

   ( pvE 0.1 in0 < "${m3t}" |LC_ALL=C gsed -n '10420001,10420256p;10420256q'; )  
  
   0.68s user 0.34s system 121% cpu 0.839 total
    256   43487   43487

54313365c2e66a48dc1dc33595716cc8  stdin


      in0: 1.85GiB 0:00:01 [1.46GiB/s] [1.46GiB/s] [=============>] 100%            
     out9: 42.5KiB 0:00:01 [33.5KiB/s] [33.5KiB/s] [  <=> ]

( pvE 0.1 in0 < "${m3t}" | LC_ALL=C perl -ne 'print if 10420001..10420256'; )
     
   1.10s user 0.44s system 119% cpu 1.289 total
    256   43487   43487

54313365c2e66a48dc1dc33595716cc8  stdin

      in0: 1.51GiB 0:00:02 [ 728MiB/s] [ 728MiB/s] [=============> ] 81%            
     out9: 42.5KiB 0:00:02 [19.9KiB/s] [19.9KiB/s] [ <=> ]

 ( pvE 0.1 in0 < "${m3t}" 
   | LC_ALL=C ghead -n +10420256 
   | LC_ALL=C gtail -n ; )  
  
 1.98s user 1.40s system 157% cpu 2.151 total
 256   43487   43487

54313365c2e66a48dc1dc33595716cc8  stdin

perl -ne 'print if 16224..16482' file.txt > new_file.txt

那些想要计算头部、|、尾部组合的间隔的人是想多了。

下面是如何在不计算任何东西的情况下得到“16224 - 16482”范围:

cat file | head -n +16482 | tail -n +16224

解释:

The + instructs the head/tail command to "go up to / start from" (respectively) the specified line number as counted from the beginning of the file. Similarly, a - instructs them to "go up to / start from" (respectively) the specified line number as counted from the end of the file The solution shown above simply uses head first, to 'keep everything up to the top number', and then tail second, to 'keep everything from the bottom number upwards', thus defining our range of interest (with no need to compute an interval).

使用head/tail非常简单:

head -16482 in.sql | tail -258 > out.sql

使用sed:

sed -n '16224,16482p' in.sql > out.sql

使用awk:

awk 'NR>=16224&&NR<=16482' in.sql > out.sql

我写了一个叫做splitter的Haskell程序，它就是这样做的:阅读我发布的博客文章。

您可以使用该程序如下:

$ cat somefile | splitter 16224-16482

这就是它的全部。您将需要Haskell来安装它。只是:

$ cabal install splitter

这样就做完了。我希望这个程序对您有用。