当我看到网站的初始代码和示例时，CSS总是在一个单独的文件中，命名为“main.css”，“default.css”或“Site.css”。然而，当我编写一个页面时，我经常试图将CSS与DOM元素放在一起，例如在图像上设置“float: right”。我觉得这是“糟糕的编码”，因为在示例中很少这样做。
我明白，如果样式将应用于多个对象，明智的做法是遵循“不要重复自己”(Don't Repeat Yourself, DRY)，并将其分配给每个元素引用的CSS类。然而，如果我不会在另一个元素上重复CSS，为什么不内联CSS，因为我写HTML?
问题是:使用内联CSS被认为是不好的，即使它只用于该元素?如果有，为什么?
例子(这样不好吗?)
<img src="myimage.gif" style="float:right" />
当前回答
使用内联样式违反了关注点分离原则，因为您实际上是在同一个源文件中混合了标记和样式。在大多数情况下，它也违反了DRY(不要重复自己)原则，因为它们只适用于单个元素，而一个类可以应用于其中的几个元素(甚至可以通过CSS规则的魔力进行扩展!)
此外，如果站点包含脚本，明智地使用类是有益的。例如，一些流行的JavaScript库(如JQuery)严重依赖类作为选择器。
最后，使用类可以增加DOM的清晰度，因为可以有效地使用描述符告诉您其中给定节点是哪种元素。例如:
<div class="header-row">It's a row!</div>
表达能力比:
<div style="height: 80px; width: 100%;">It's...something?</div>
其他回答
我们已经创建了一个模板驱动的工件生成器，它为任何类型的文本工件——HTML、XML、计算机语言、非结构化文本、DSV等——提供了包含文件的功能(例如，它非常适合处理普通Web或手动页面的页眉和页脚，而无需脚本)。
一旦你有了它，并使用它在你的“head”标签中提供“style”标签，“关注点分离”参数就消失了，取而代之的是“我们必须在对模板的每次更改后重新生成”和“我们必须从它生成的内容中调试模板”。自从第一种计算机语言获得预处理器(或者有人开始使用M4)以来，这些抱怨就一直存在。
总的来说，我们认为CSS文件或“style”标签的元化功能比元素级样式化更简洁，更不容易出错。但这确实需要一些专业判断，所以新手和散漫的人不必费心。
Code how you like to code, but if you are passing it on to someone else it is best to use what everyone else does. There are reasons for CSS, then there are reasons for inline. I use both, because it is just easier for me. Using CSS is wonderful when you have a lot of the same repetition. However, when you have a bunch of different elements with different properties then that becomes a problem. One instance for me is when I am positioning elements on a page. Each element as a different top and left property. If I put that all in a CSS that would really annoy the mess out of me going between the html and css page. So CSS is great when you want everything to have the same font, color, hover effect, etc. But when everything has a different position adding a CSS instance for each element can really be a pain. That is just my opinion though. CSS really has great relevance in larger applications when your having to dig through code. Use Mozilla web developer plugin and it will help you find the elements IDs and Classes.
Personally, I think the hatred of inline css is just ridiculous. Hardcore cult behaviour, people just sheepishly repeat "Separation of concerns!". Yes, there are times where if there is a repeating element and you will need repeated styling to use a class targeted from a CSS file, but most of the time it improves speed of development and CLARITY OF CODE to put the style inline, it's great if I can look at the code and see that there is a custom margin height, it helps me picture the HTML document as a whole, instead of some named class that gives me little insight into which styles will be applied.
所以在这里我要做一个逆向的人，我要说内联css是伟大的，那些对你使用它大喊大叫的人只是在遵循他们被告知的东西，而实际上并没有给予任何原始的、公正的考虑。
CSS的全部意义在于将内容与其表示分开。所以在你的例子中，你把内容和表现形式混在一起了，这可能是“有害的”。
尽管我完全同意上面给出的所有答案，在一个单独的文件中编写CSS从代码可重用性、可维护性和更好的关注点分离来看总是更好的，但在许多情况下，人们更喜欢在生产代码中使用内联CSS
The external CSS file causes one extra HTTP call to browser and thus additional latency. Instead if the CSS is inserted inline then browser can start parsing it right away. Especially over SSL HTTP calls are more costly and adds up additional latency to the page. There are many tools available that helps to generate static HTML pages (or page snippet) by inserting external CSS files as inline code. These tools are used at the Build and Release phase where the production binary is generated. This way we get all the advantages of external CSS and also the page becomes faster.
