我有一个解决这个问题的办法。我已经在自己的应用(DAU超过30万)中验证了这一修复方法，它至少可以减少95%的这种崩溃，但仍然不能100%避免这个问题。

即使您确保在服务启动后调用start前台()，也会发生此问题。这可能是因为在很多情况下，服务创建和初始化过程已经花费了超过5秒的时间，那么无论何时何地调用startForeground()方法，这个崩溃都是不可避免的。

我的解决方案是确保start前台()将在startForegroundService()方法后的5秒内执行，无论您的服务需要创建和初始化多长时间。下面是详细的解决方案。

Do not use startForegroundService at the first place, use bindService() with auto_create flag. It will wait for the service initialization. Here is the code, my sample service is MusicService: final Context applicationContext = context.getApplicationContext(); Intent intent = new Intent(context, MusicService.class); applicationContext.bindService(intent, new ServiceConnection() { @Override public void onServiceConnected(ComponentName name, IBinder binder) { if (binder instanceof MusicBinder) { MusicBinder musicBinder = (MusicBinder) binder; MusicService service = musicBinder.getService(); if (service != null) { // start a command such as music play or pause. service.startCommand(command); // force the service to run in foreground here. // the service is already initialized when bind and auto_create. service.forceForeground(); } } applicationContext.unbindService(this); } @Override public void onServiceDisconnected(ComponentName name) { } }, Context.BIND_AUTO_CREATE); Then here is MusicBinder implementation: /** * Use weak reference to avoid binder service leak. */ public class MusicBinder extends Binder { private WeakReference<MusicService> weakService; /** * Inject service instance to weak reference. */ public void onBind(MusicService service) { this.weakService = new WeakReference<>(service); } public MusicService getService() { return weakService == null ? null : weakService.get(); } } The most important part, MusicService implementation, forceForeground() method will ensure that startForeground() method is called just after service start: public class MusicService extends MediaBrowserServiceCompat { ... private final MusicBinder musicBind = new MusicBinder(); ... @Override public IBinder onBind(Intent intent) { musicBind.onBind(this); return musicBind; } ... public void forceForeground() { // API lower than 26 do not need this work around. if (Build.VERSION.SDK_INT >= 26) { Notification notification = mNotificationHandler.createNotification(this); // call startForeground just after service start. startForeground(Constants.NOTIFICATION_ID, notification); } } } If you want to run the step 1 code snippet in a pending intent, such as if you want to start a foreground service in a widget (a click on widget button) without opening your app, you can wrap the code snippet in a broadcast receiver, and fire a broadcast event instead of start service command.

仅此而已。希望能有所帮助。祝你好运。

以下是谷歌在Android 8.0上的行为变化:

系统允许应用程序调用Context.startForegroundService()，即使应用程序处于后台。但是，应用程序必须在服务创建后的5秒内调用该服务的startForeground()方法。

解决方案: 在onCreate()中为你使用的服务调用start前台()

请参见:Android 8.0 (Oreo)的后台执行限制

一个问题可能是服务类没有在AndroidManifest文件中启用。 也请检查一下。

<service
        android:name=".AudioRecorderService"
        android:enabled="true"
        android:exported="false"
        android:foregroundServiceType="microphone" />

服务

class TestService : Service() {

    override fun onCreate() {
        super.onCreate()
        Log.d(TAG, "onCreate")

        val nBuilder = NotificationCompat.Builder(this, "all")
            .setSmallIcon(R.drawable.ic_launcher_foreground)
            .setContentTitle("TestService")
            .setPriority(NotificationCompat.PRIORITY_DEFAULT)
        startForeground(1337, nBuilder.build())
    }

    override fun onStartCommand(intent: Intent?, flags: Int, startId: Int): Int {
        val rtn = super.onStartCommand(intent, flags, startId)

        if (intent?.action == STOP_ACTION) {
            Log.d(TAG, "onStartCommand -> STOP")
            stopForeground(true)
            stopSelf()
        } else {
            Log.d(TAG, "onStartCommand -> START")
        }

        return rtn
    }

    override fun onDestroy() {
        Log.d(TAG, "onDestroy")
        super.onDestroy()
    }

    override fun onBind(intent: Intent?): IBinder? = null

    companion object {

        private val TAG = "TestService"
        private val STOP_ACTION = "ly.zen.test.TestService.ACTION_STOP"

        fun start(context: Context) {
            ContextCompat.startForegroundService(context, Intent(context, TestService::class.java))
        }

        fun stop(context: Context) {
            val intent = Intent(context, TestService::class.java)
            intent.action = STOP_ACTION
            ContextCompat.startForegroundService(context, intent)
        }

    }

}

测试人员

val nChannel = NotificationChannel("all", "All", NotificationManager.IMPORTANCE_NONE)
val nManager = getSystemService(Context.NOTIFICATION_SERVICE) as NotificationManager
nManager.createNotificationChannel(nChannel)

start_test_service.setOnClickListener {
    TestService.start(this@MainActivity)
    TestService.stop(this@MainActivity)
}

结果

D/TestService: onCreate
D/TestService: onStartCommand -> START
D/TestService: onStartCommand -> STOP
D/TestService: onDestroy

好吧，我注意到的一些东西可能也会对其他人有所帮助。这是严格的测试，看看我是否能找出如何解决我所看到的事件。为了简单起见，假设我有一个从演示者调用这个的方法。

context.startForegroundService(new Intent(context, TaskQueueExecutorService.class));

try {
    Thread.sleep(10000);
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
    e.printStackTrace();
}       

这将导致同样的错误。在方法完成之前，服务不会启动，因此服务中没有onCreate()。

So even if you update the UI off the main thread, IF you have anything that might hold up that method after it, it won't start on time and give you the dreaded Foreground Error. In my case we were loading some things onto a queue and each called startForegroundService, but some logic was involved with each in the background. So if the logic took too long to finish that method since they were called back to back, crash time. The old startService just ignored it and went on it's way and since we called it each time, the next round would finish up.

这让我想知道，如果我从后台线程调用服务，它是否可以在启动时完全绑定并立即运行，因此我开始试验。即使这样不会立即启动，它也不会崩溃。

new Handler(Looper.getMainLooper()).post(new Runnable() {
        public void run() {
               context.startForegroundService(new Intent(context, 
           TaskQueueExecutorService.class));
               try {
                   Thread.sleep(10000);
               } catch (InterruptedException e) {
                  e.printStackTrace();
              }       
        }
});

我不会假装知道为什么它没有崩溃，尽管我怀疑这迫使它等待，直到主线程能够及时处理它。我知道将它绑定到主线程并不理想，但由于我的使用是在后台调用它，所以我并不真正关心它是否等待完成而不是崩溃。

我也面临着同样的问题，花时间找到了一个解决方案，你可以尝试下面的代码。如果你使用服务，然后把这段代码放在onCreate，否则你使用意图服务，然后把这段代码放在onHandleIntent。

if (Build.VERSION.SDK_INT >= 26) {
        String CHANNEL_ID = "my_app";
        NotificationChannel channel = new NotificationChannel(CHANNEL_ID,
                "MyApp", NotificationManager.IMPORTANCE_DEFAULT);
        ((NotificationManager) getSystemService(Context.NOTIFICATION_SERVICE)).createNotificationChannel(channel);
        Notification notification = new NotificationCompat.Builder(this, CHANNEL_ID)
                .setContentTitle("")
                .setContentText("").build();
        startForeground(1, notification);
    }