我在@humazed答案中添加了一些代码。所以没有初始通知。这可能是个变通办法，但对我来说很管用。

@Override
 public void onCreate() {
        super.onCreate();

        if (Build.VERSION.SDK_INT >= 26) {
            String CHANNEL_ID = "my_channel_01";
            NotificationChannel channel = new NotificationChannel(CHANNEL_ID,
                    "Channel human readable title",
                    NotificationManager.IMPORTANCE_DEFAULT);

            ((NotificationManager) getSystemService(Context.NOTIFICATION_SERVICE)).createNotificationChannel(channel);

            Notification notification = new NotificationCompat.Builder(this, CHANNEL_ID)
                    .setContentTitle("")
                    .setContentText("")
                    .setColor(ContextCompat.getColor(this, R.color.transparentColor))
                    .setSmallIcon(ContextCompat.getColor(this, R.color.transparentColor)).build();

            startForeground(1, notification);
        }
}

我在小图标和通知上添加了transparentColor。 它会起作用的。

我只是检查PendingIntent null或或不是之前调用 context.startForegroundService (service_intent)功能。

这对我很有用

PendingIntent pendingIntent=PendingIntent.getBroadcast(context,0,intent,PendingIntent.FLAG_NO_CREATE);

if (Build.VERSION.SDK_INT >= Build.VERSION_CODES.O && pendingIntent==null){
            context.startForegroundService(service_intent);
        }
        else
        {
            context.startService(service_intent);
        }
}

此错误也发生在Android 8+服务时。start前台(int id, Notification Notification)在id设置为0时被调用。

id int:该通知的标识符，根据NotificationManager。通知(int、通知);一定不是0。

只要在创建Service或IntentService后立即调用start前台方法。是这样的:

import android.app.Notification;
public class AuthenticationService extends Service {

    @Override
    public void onCreate() {
        super.onCreate();
        startForeground(1,new Notification());
    }
}

好吧，我注意到的一些东西可能也会对其他人有所帮助。这是严格的测试，看看我是否能找出如何解决我所看到的事件。为了简单起见，假设我有一个从演示者调用这个的方法。

context.startForegroundService(new Intent(context, TaskQueueExecutorService.class));

try {
    Thread.sleep(10000);
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
    e.printStackTrace();
}       

这将导致同样的错误。在方法完成之前，服务不会启动，因此服务中没有onCreate()。

So even if you update the UI off the main thread, IF you have anything that might hold up that method after it, it won't start on time and give you the dreaded Foreground Error. In my case we were loading some things onto a queue and each called startForegroundService, but some logic was involved with each in the background. So if the logic took too long to finish that method since they were called back to back, crash time. The old startService just ignored it and went on it's way and since we called it each time, the next round would finish up.

这让我想知道，如果我从后台线程调用服务，它是否可以在启动时完全绑定并立即运行，因此我开始试验。即使这样不会立即启动，它也不会崩溃。

new Handler(Looper.getMainLooper()).post(new Runnable() {
        public void run() {
               context.startForegroundService(new Intent(context, 
           TaskQueueExecutorService.class));
               try {
                   Thread.sleep(10000);
               } catch (InterruptedException e) {
                  e.printStackTrace();
              }       
        }
});

我不会假装知道为什么它没有崩溃，尽管我怀疑这迫使它等待，直到主线程能够及时处理它。我知道将它绑定到主线程并不理想，但由于我的使用是在后台调用它，所以我并不真正关心它是否等待完成而不是崩溃。

我在Pixel 3和Android 11中遇到了一个问题，当我的服务运行得很短时，前台通知没有被取消。

在stopForeground() stopSelf()之前添加100ms的延迟似乎有所帮助。

人们在这里写道，stopprospect()应该在stopSelf()之前被调用。我不能确认，但我猜它不会费心去做。

public class AService extends Service {

@Override
public void onCreate() {
    if (Build.VERSION.SDK_INT >= Build.VERSION_CODES.Q) {
        startForeground(
            getForegroundNotificationId(),
            channelManager.buildBackgroundInfoNotification(getNotificationTitle(), getNotificationText()),
            ServiceInfo.FOREGROUND_SERVICE_TYPE_DATA_SYNC);
    } else {
        startForeground(getForegroundNotificationId(),
            channelManager.buildBackgroundInfoNotification(getNotificationTitle(), getNotificationText())
        );
    }

@Override
public int onStartCommand(Intent intent, int flags, int startId) {
    startForeground();

    if (hasQueueMoreItems()) {
        startWorkerThreads();
    } else {
        stopForeground(true);
        stopSelf();
    }
    return START_STICKY;
}

private class WorkerRunnable implements Runnable {

    @Override
    public void run() {

        while (getItem() != null && !isLoopInterrupted) {
            doSomething(getItem())   
        }

        waitALittle();
        stopForeground(true);
        stopSelf();
    }

    private void waitALittle() {
        try {
            Thread.sleep(100);
        } catch (InterruptedException e) {
            e.printStackTrace();
        }
    }
}
}