更新onStartCommand中的数据(…)

上绑定（...

与onCreate(…)相比，onBind(…)是一个更好的生命周期事件来初始化start前台，因为onBind(…)传递了一个Intent，其中可能包含初始化服务所需的Bundle中的重要数据。然而，这是不必要的，因为onStartCommand(…)是在服务第一次创建或后续多次调用时调用的。

onStartCommand（...）

onStartCommand(…)中的start前台是很重要的，以便在服务创建后更新它。

当ContextCompat.startForegroundService(…)在服务创建后被调用时，onBind(…)和onCreate(…)没有被调用。因此，更新后的数据可以通过Intent Bundle传递到onStartCommand(…)来更新服务中的数据。

样本

我使用这个模式在Coinverse加密货币新闻应用程序中实现PlayerNotificationManager。

Activity / Fragment.kt

context?.bindService(
        Intent(context, AudioService::class.java),
        serviceConnection, Context.BIND_AUTO_CREATE)
ContextCompat.startForegroundService(
        context!!,
        Intent(context, AudioService::class.java).apply {
            action = CONTENT_SELECTED_ACTION
            putExtra(CONTENT_SELECTED_KEY, contentToPlay.content.apply {
                audioUrl = uri.toString()
            })
        })

AudioService.kt

private var uri: Uri = Uri.parse("")

override fun onBind(intent: Intent?) =
        AudioServiceBinder().apply {
            player = ExoPlayerFactory.newSimpleInstance(
                    applicationContext,
                    AudioOnlyRenderersFactory(applicationContext),
                    DefaultTrackSelector())
        }

override fun onStartCommand(intent: Intent?, flags: Int, startId: Int): Int {
    intent?.let {
        when (intent.action) {
            CONTENT_SELECTED_ACTION -> it.getParcelableExtra<Content>(CONTENT_SELECTED_KEY).also { content ->
                val intentUri = Uri.parse(content.audioUrl)
                // Checks whether to update Uri passed in Intent Bundle.
                if (!intentUri.equals(uri)) {
                    uri = intentUri
                    player?.prepare(ProgressiveMediaSource.Factory(
                            DefaultDataSourceFactory(
                                    this,
                                    Util.getUserAgent(this, getString(app_name))))
                            .createMediaSource(uri))
                    player?.playWhenReady = true
                    // Calling 'startForeground' in 'buildNotification(...)'.          
                    buildNotification(intent.getParcelableExtra(CONTENT_SELECTED_KEY))
                }
            }
        }
    }
    return super.onStartCommand(intent, flags, startId)
}

// Calling 'startForeground' in 'onNotificationStarted(...)'.
private fun buildNotification(content: Content): Unit? {
    playerNotificationManager = PlayerNotificationManager.createWithNotificationChannel(
            this,
            content.title,
            app_name,
            if (!content.audioUrl.isNullOrEmpty()) 1 else -1,
            object : PlayerNotificationManager.MediaDescriptionAdapter {
                override fun createCurrentContentIntent(player: Player?) = ...
                override fun getCurrentContentText(player: Player?) = ...
                override fun getCurrentContentTitle(player: Player?) = ...
                override fun getCurrentLargeIcon(player: Player?,
                                                 callback: PlayerNotificationManager.BitmapCallback?) = ...
            },
            object : PlayerNotificationManager.NotificationListener {
                override fun onNotificationStarted(notificationId: Int, notification: Notification) {
                    startForeground(notificationId, notification)
                }
                override fun onNotificationCancelled(notificationId: Int) {
                    stopForeground(true)
                    stopSelf()
                }
            })
    return playerNotificationManager.setPlayer(player)
}

此错误也发生在Android 8+服务时。start前台(int id, Notification Notification)在id设置为0时被调用。

id int:该通知的标识符，根据NotificationManager。通知(int、通知);一定不是0。

因为每个来这里的人都遭受着同样的痛苦，我想分享我的解决方法，之前没有人尝试过(在这个问题中)。我可以向您保证，它是工作的，甚至在一个停止的断点上确认这个方法。

问题是调用服务。start前台(id, notification)来自服务本身，对吧?不幸的是，Android框架不保证调用服务。Service.onCreate()中的start前台(id, notification)在5秒内，但无论如何都会抛出异常，所以我想出了这种方法。

Bind the service to a context with a binder from the service before calling Context.startForegroundService() If the bind is successful, call Context.startForegroundService() from the service connection and immediately call Service.startForeground() inside the service connection. IMPORTANT NOTE: Call the Context.bindService() method inside a try-catch because in some occasions the call can throw an exception, in which case you need to rely on calling Context.startForegroundService() directly and hope it will not fail. An example can be a broadcast receiver context, however getting application context does not throw an exception in that case, but using the context directly does.

这甚至可以在我绑定服务后和触发“startForeground”调用之前等待断点时工作。等待3-4秒不会触发异常，而5秒后会抛出异常。(如果设备不能在5秒内执行两行代码，那么就该把它扔进垃圾桶了。)

因此，首先创建一个服务连接。

// Create the service connection.
ServiceConnection connection = new ServiceConnection()
{
    @Override
    public void onServiceConnected(ComponentName name, IBinder service)
    {
        // The binder of the service that returns the instance that is created.
        MyService.LocalBinder binder = (MyService.LocalBinder) service;

        // The getter method to acquire the service.
        MyService myService = binder.getService();

        // getServiceIntent(context) returns the relative service intent 
        context.startForegroundService(getServiceIntent(context));

        // This is the key: Without waiting Android Framework to call this method
        // inside Service.onCreate(), immediately call here to post the notification.
        myService.startForeground(myNotificationId, MyService.getNotification());

        // Release the connection to prevent leaks.
        context.unbindService(this);
    }

    @Override
    public void onBindingDied(ComponentName name)
    {
        Log.w(TAG, "Binding has dead.");
    }

    @Override
    public void onNullBinding(ComponentName name)
    {
        Log.w(TAG, "Bind was null.");
    }

    @Override
    public void onServiceDisconnected(ComponentName name)
    {
        Log.w(TAG, "Service is disconnected..");
    }
};

在服务内部，创建一个返回服务实例的绑定器。

public class MyService extends Service
{
    public class LocalBinder extends Binder
    {
        public MyService getService()
        {
            return MyService.this;
        }
    }

    // Create the instance on the service.
    private final LocalBinder binder = new LocalBinder();

    // Return this instance from onBind method.
    // You may also return new LocalBinder() which is
    // basically the same thing.
    @Nullable
    @Override
    public IBinder onBind(Intent intent)
    {
        return binder;
    }
}

然后，尝试从该上下文中绑定服务。如果成功，它将从您正在使用的服务连接调用serviceconnection . onserviceconnconnected()方法。然后，处理上面所示代码中的逻辑。示例代码如下所示:

// Try to bind the service
try
{
     context.bindService(getServiceIntent(context), connection,
                    Context.BIND_AUTO_CREATE);
}
catch (RuntimeException ignored)
{
     // This is probably a broadcast receiver context even though we are calling getApplicationContext().
     // Just call startForegroundService instead since we cannot bind a service to a
     // broadcast receiver context. The service also have to call startForeground in
     // this case.
     context.startForegroundService(getServiceIntent(context));
}

它似乎在我开发的应用程序上工作，所以当你尝试时它应该也能工作。

以下是谷歌在Android 12上的行为变化:

To provide a streamlined experience for short-running foreground services on Android 12, the system can delay the display of foreground service notifications by 10 seconds for certain foreground services. This change gives short-lived tasks a chance to complete before their notifications appear.

解决方案:在onCreate()中为你使用的服务调用start前台()

我一直在研究这个问题，这是我目前为止的发现。如果我们有类似这样的代码，就会发生崩溃:

MyForegroundService.java

public class MyForegroundService extends Service {
    @Override
    public void onCreate() {
        super.onCreate();
        startForeground(...);
    }
}

MainActivity.java

Intent serviceIntent = new Intent(this, MyForegroundService.class);
startForegroundService(serviceIntent);
...
stopService(serviceIntent);

异常在以下代码块中抛出:

ActiveServices.java

private final void bringDownServiceLocked(ServiceRecord r) {
    ...
    if (r.fgRequired) {
        Slog.w(TAG_SERVICE, "Bringing down service while still waiting for start foreground: "
                  + r);
        r.fgRequired = false;
        r.fgWaiting = false;
        mAm.mAppOpsService.finishOperation(AppOpsManager.getToken(mAm.mAppOpsService),
                    AppOpsManager.OP_START_FOREGROUND, r.appInfo.uid, r.packageName);
        mAm.mHandler.removeMessages(
                    ActivityManagerService.SERVICE_FOREGROUND_TIMEOUT_MSG, r);
        if (r.app != null) {
            Message msg = mAm.mHandler.obtainMessage(
                ActivityManagerService.SERVICE_FOREGROUND_CRASH_MSG);
            msg.obj = r.app;
            msg.getData().putCharSequence(
                ActivityManagerService.SERVICE_RECORD_KEY, r.toString());
            mAm.mHandler.sendMessage(msg);
         }
    }
    ...
}

这个方法在MyForegroundService的onCreate()之前执行，因为Android在主线程处理程序上安排了服务的创建，但在BinderThread上调用了bringdownservicelock，这是一个竞争条件。这意味着MyForegroundService没有机会调用start前台，这将导致崩溃。

为了解决这个问题，我们必须确保在MyForegroundService的onCreate()之前不调用bringdownservicellocked。

public class MyForegroundService extends Service {

    private static final String ACTION_STOP = "com.example.MyForegroundService.ACTION_STOP";

    private final BroadcastReceiver stopReceiver = new BroadcastReceiver() {
        @Override
        public void onReceive(Context context, Intent intent) {
            context.removeStickyBroadcast(intent);
            stopForeground(true);
            stopSelf();
        }
    };

    @Override
    public void onCreate() {
        super.onCreate();
        startForeground(...);
        registerReceiver(
            stopReceiver, new IntentFilter(ACTION_STOP));
    }

    @Override
    public void onDestroy() {
        super.onDestroy();
        unregisterReceiver(stopReceiver);
    }

    public static void stop(Context context) {
        context.sendStickyBroadcast(new Intent(ACTION_STOP));
    }
}

通过使用粘性广播，我们确保广播不会丢失，stopReceiver在MyForegroundService的onCreate()中注册后立即接收到停止意图。此时我们已经调用了startForeground(…)。我们还必须删除这个粘滞的广播，以防止下一次stopReceiver被通知。

请注意，sendStickyBroadcast方法已弃用，我仅将其用作解决此问题的临时方法。

在我的例子中，我称之为上下文。在服务有机会在内部调用start前台之前，停止服务(外部服务)。