super()如何处理多重继承?例如,给定:

class First(object):
    def __init__(self):
        print "first"

class Second(object):
    def __init__(self):
        print "second"

class Third(First, Second):
    def __init__(self):
        super(Third, self).__init__()
        print "that's it"

Third的哪个父方法执行super()。__init__ refer to?我可以选择哪些运行吗?

我知道这与方法解析顺序(MRO)有关。


当前回答

我想补充一下@Visionscaper在开头说的话:

Third --> First --> object --> Second --> object

在这种情况下,解释器不会过滤掉对象类,因为它是重复的,而是因为Second出现在一个层次结构子集的头部位置,而不是尾部位置。而在C3算法中,对象只出现在尾部位置,不被认为是一个强位置来确定优先级。

线性化(mro)的类C, L(C),是

丙类 加上归并 线性化父函数P1, P2, ..= L(P1, P2,… 它的父元素P1, P2, ..

线性化合并是通过选择出现在列表头部而不是尾部的公共类来完成的,因为顺序很重要(下面会清楚地说明)

Third的线性化计算如下:

    L(O)  := [O]  // the linearization(mro) of O(object), because O has no parents

    L(First)  :=  [First] + merge(L(O), [O])
               =  [First] + merge([O], [O])
               =  [First, O]

    // Similarly, 
    L(Second)  := [Second, O]

    L(Third)   := [Third] + merge(L(First), L(Second), [First, Second])
                = [Third] + merge([First, O], [Second, O], [First, Second])
// class First is a good candidate for the first merge step, because it only appears as the head of the first and last lists
// class O is not a good candidate for the next merge step, because it also appears in the tails of list 1 and 2, 
                = [Third, First] + merge([O], [Second, O], [Second])
// class Second is a good candidate for the second merge step, because it appears as the head of the list 2 and 3
                = [Third, First, Second] + merge([O], [O])            
                = [Third, First, Second, O]

因此,对于下面代码中的super()实现:

class First(object):
  def __init__(self):
    super(First, self).__init__()
    print "first"

class Second(object):
  def __init__(self):
    super(Second, self).__init__()
    print "second"

class Third(First, Second):
  def __init__(self):
    super(Third, self).__init__()
    print "that's it"

很明显,这个方法将如何解决

Third.__init__() ---> First.__init__() ---> Second.__init__() ---> 
Object.__init__() ---> returns ---> Second.__init__() -
prints "second" - returns ---> First.__init__() -
prints "first" - returns ---> Third.__init__() - prints "that's it"

其他回答

另一个尚未涉及的点是传递初始化类的参数。由于super的目标取决于子类,传递参数的唯一好方法是将它们打包在一起。然后注意不要让相同的参数名具有不同的含义。

例子:

class A(object):
    def __init__(self, **kwargs):
        print('A.__init__')
        super().__init__()

class B(A):
    def __init__(self, **kwargs):
        print('B.__init__ {}'.format(kwargs['x']))
        super().__init__(**kwargs)


class C(A):
    def __init__(self, **kwargs):
        print('C.__init__ with {}, {}'.format(kwargs['a'], kwargs['b']))
        super().__init__(**kwargs)


class D(B, C): # MRO=D, B, C, A
    def __init__(self):
        print('D.__init__')
        super().__init__(a=1, b=2, x=3)

print(D.mro())
D()

给:

[<class '__main__.D'>, <class '__main__.B'>, <class '__main__.C'>, <class '__main__.A'>, <class 'object'>]
D.__init__
B.__init__ 3
C.__init__ with 1, 2
A.__init__

直接调用超类__init__来更直接地赋值参数是很诱人的,但如果在超类中有任何超调用和/或MRO被更改并且类a可能被多次调用,则会失败,这取决于实现。

总结一下:合作继承和初始化的超参数和特定参数不能很好地协同工作。

我知道这并没有直接回答super()问题,但我觉得它有足够的相关性来分享。

还有一种方法可以直接调用每个继承的类:


class First(object):
    def __init__(self):
        print '1'

class Second(object):
    def __init__(self):
        print '2'

class Third(First, Second):
    def __init__(self):
        Second.__init__(self)

请注意,如果你这样做,你将不得不手动调用每个,因为我很确定First的__init__()不会被调用。

在python 3.5+中,继承看起来是可预测的,对我来说非常好。 请看下面的代码:

class Base(object):
  def foo(self):
    print("    Base(): entering")
    print("    Base(): exiting")


class First(Base):
  def foo(self):
    print("   First(): entering Will call Second now")
    super().foo()
    print("   First(): exiting")


class Second(Base):
  def foo(self):
    print("  Second(): entering")
    super().foo()
    print("  Second(): exiting")


class Third(First, Second):
  def foo(self):
    print(" Third(): entering")
    super().foo()
    print(" Third(): exiting")


class Fourth(Third):
  def foo(self):
    print("Fourth(): entering")
    super().foo()
    print("Fourth(): exiting")

Fourth().foo()
print(Fourth.__mro__)

输出:

Fourth(): entering
 Third(): entering
   First(): entering Will call Second now
  Second(): entering
    Base(): entering
    Base(): exiting
  Second(): exiting
   First(): exiting
 Third(): exiting
Fourth(): exiting
(<class '__main__.Fourth'>, <class '__main__.Third'>, <class '__main__.First'>, <class '__main__.Second'>, <class '__main__.Base'>, <class 'object'>)

正如你所看到的,它对每个继承链调用foo一次,其顺序与继承链的顺序相同。你可以通过调用.mro来获得订单:

Fourth -> Third -> First -> Second -> Base ->对象

把这个答案贴出来供我将来参考。

Python多重继承应该使用菱形模型,并且函数签名不应该在模型中更改。

    A
   / \
  B   C
   \ /
    D

示例代码片段为;-

class A:
    def __init__(self, name=None):
        #  this is the head of the diamond, no need to call super() here
        self.name = name

class B(A):
    def __init__(self, param1='hello', **kwargs):
        super().__init__(**kwargs)
        self.param1 = param1

class C(A):
    def __init__(self, param2='bye', **kwargs):
        super().__init__(**kwargs)
        self.param2 = param2

class D(B, C):
    def __init__(self, works='fine', **kwargs):
        super().__init__(**kwargs)
        print(f"{works=}, {self.param1=}, {self.param2=}, {self.name=}")

d = D(name='Testing')

这里类A是对象

关于@calfzhou的评论,你可以像往常一样使用**kwargs:

在线运行示例

class A(object):
  def __init__(self, a, *args, **kwargs):
    print("A", a)

class B(A):
  def __init__(self, b, *args, **kwargs):
    super(B, self).__init__(*args, **kwargs)
    print("B", b)

class A1(A):
  def __init__(self, a1, *args, **kwargs):
    super(A1, self).__init__(*args, **kwargs)
    print("A1", a1)

class B1(A1, B):
  def __init__(self, b1, *args, **kwargs):
    super(B1, self).__init__(*args, **kwargs)
    print("B1", b1)


B1(a1=6, b1=5, b="hello", a=None)

结果:

A None
B hello
A1 6
B1 5

你也可以在不同的位置使用它们:

B1(5, 6, b="hello", a=None)

但你必须记住MRO,它真的很混乱。你可以通过使用关键字参数来避免这种情况:

class A(object):
  def __init__(self, *args, a, **kwargs):
    print("A", a)

等等。

我可能有点烦人,但我注意到人们每次重写一个方法时都会忘记使用*args和**kwargs,而这是这些“神奇变量”为数不多的真正有用和理智的使用之一。