super()如何处理多重继承?例如,给定:

class First(object):
    def __init__(self):
        print "first"

class Second(object):
    def __init__(self):
        print "second"

class Third(First, Second):
    def __init__(self):
        super(Third, self).__init__()
        print "that's it"

Third的哪个父方法执行super()。__init__ refer to?我可以选择哪些运行吗?

我知道这与方法解析顺序(MRO)有关。


当前回答

class First(object):
  def __init__(self, a):
    print "first", a
    super(First, self).__init__(20)

class Second(object):
  def __init__(self, a):
    print "second", a
    super(Second, self).__init__()

class Third(First, Second):
  def __init__(self):
    super(Third, self).__init__(10)
    print "that's it"

t = Third()

输出是

first 10
second 20
that's it

调用Third()定位在Third中定义的init。在这个例程中调用super调用First中定义的init。MRO =(一、二)。 现在在First中定义的init中调用super将继续搜索MRO并找到Second中定义的init,并且任何对super的调用都将命中默认对象init。我希望这个例子能够阐明这个概念。

如果你不在第一分局给管理员打电话。链条停止,您将得到以下输出。

first 10
that's it

其他回答

class First(object):
  def __init__(self, a):
    print "first", a
    super(First, self).__init__(20)

class Second(object):
  def __init__(self, a):
    print "second", a
    super(Second, self).__init__()

class Third(First, Second):
  def __init__(self):
    super(Third, self).__init__(10)
    print "that's it"

t = Third()

输出是

first 10
second 20
that's it

调用Third()定位在Third中定义的init。在这个例程中调用super调用First中定义的init。MRO =(一、二)。 现在在First中定义的init中调用super将继续搜索MRO并找到Second中定义的init,并且任何对super的调用都将命中默认对象init。我希望这个例子能够阐明这个概念。

如果你不在第一分局给管理员打电话。链条停止,您将得到以下输出。

first 10
that's it

我想补充一下@Visionscaper在开头说的话:

Third --> First --> object --> Second --> object

在这种情况下,解释器不会过滤掉对象类,因为它是重复的,而是因为Second出现在一个层次结构子集的头部位置,而不是尾部位置。而在C3算法中,对象只出现在尾部位置,不被认为是一个强位置来确定优先级。

线性化(mro)的类C, L(C),是

丙类 加上归并 线性化父函数P1, P2, ..= L(P1, P2,… 它的父元素P1, P2, ..

线性化合并是通过选择出现在列表头部而不是尾部的公共类来完成的,因为顺序很重要(下面会清楚地说明)

Third的线性化计算如下:

    L(O)  := [O]  // the linearization(mro) of O(object), because O has no parents

    L(First)  :=  [First] + merge(L(O), [O])
               =  [First] + merge([O], [O])
               =  [First, O]

    // Similarly, 
    L(Second)  := [Second, O]

    L(Third)   := [Third] + merge(L(First), L(Second), [First, Second])
                = [Third] + merge([First, O], [Second, O], [First, Second])
// class First is a good candidate for the first merge step, because it only appears as the head of the first and last lists
// class O is not a good candidate for the next merge step, because it also appears in the tails of list 1 and 2, 
                = [Third, First] + merge([O], [Second, O], [Second])
// class Second is a good candidate for the second merge step, because it appears as the head of the list 2 and 3
                = [Third, First, Second] + merge([O], [O])            
                = [Third, First, Second, O]

因此,对于下面代码中的super()实现:

class First(object):
  def __init__(self):
    super(First, self).__init__()
    print "first"

class Second(object):
  def __init__(self):
    super(Second, self).__init__()
    print "second"

class Third(First, Second):
  def __init__(self):
    super(Third, self).__init__()
    print "that's it"

很明显,这个方法将如何解决

Third.__init__() ---> First.__init__() ---> Second.__init__() ---> 
Object.__init__() ---> returns ---> Second.__init__() -
prints "second" - returns ---> First.__init__() -
prints "first" - returns ---> Third.__init__() - prints "that's it"

这就是所谓的钻石问题,该页面有一个关于Python的条目,但简而言之,Python将从左到右调用超类的方法。

在python 3.5+中,继承看起来是可预测的,对我来说非常好。 请看下面的代码:

class Base(object):
  def foo(self):
    print("    Base(): entering")
    print("    Base(): exiting")


class First(Base):
  def foo(self):
    print("   First(): entering Will call Second now")
    super().foo()
    print("   First(): exiting")


class Second(Base):
  def foo(self):
    print("  Second(): entering")
    super().foo()
    print("  Second(): exiting")


class Third(First, Second):
  def foo(self):
    print(" Third(): entering")
    super().foo()
    print(" Third(): exiting")


class Fourth(Third):
  def foo(self):
    print("Fourth(): entering")
    super().foo()
    print("Fourth(): exiting")

Fourth().foo()
print(Fourth.__mro__)

输出:

Fourth(): entering
 Third(): entering
   First(): entering Will call Second now
  Second(): entering
    Base(): entering
    Base(): exiting
  Second(): exiting
   First(): exiting
 Third(): exiting
Fourth(): exiting
(<class '__main__.Fourth'>, <class '__main__.Third'>, <class '__main__.First'>, <class '__main__.Second'>, <class '__main__.Base'>, <class 'object'>)

正如你所看到的,它对每个继承链调用foo一次,其顺序与继承链的顺序相同。你可以通过调用.mro来获得订单:

Fourth -> Third -> First -> Second -> Base ->对象

在这种情况下,你试图继承的每个类都有自己的init位置参数,只需调用每个类自己的init方法,如果试图继承多个对象,则不要使用super。

class A():
    def __init__(self, x):
        self.x = x

class B():
    def __init__(self, y, z):
        self.y = y
        self.z = z

class C(A, B):
    def __init__(self, x, y, z):
        A.__init__(self, x)
        B.__init__(self, y, z)

>>> c = C(1,2,3)
>>>c.x, c.y, c.z 
(1, 2, 3)