根据Prerak K的更新评论(已删除):

我想我没有恰当地提出这个问题。 情况是这样的:我想根据控件的值将数据加载到全局变量中。我不想改变子线程中控件的值。我不会从子线程中做。 因此只能访问值，以便从数据库中获取相应的数据。

你想要的解决方案应该是这样的:

UserContrl1_LOadDataMethod()
{
    string name = "";
    if(textbox1.InvokeRequired)
    {
        textbox1.Invoke(new MethodInvoker(delegate { name = textbox1.text; }));
    }
    if(name == "MyName")
    {
        // do whatever
    }
}

在尝试切换回控件的线程之前，在单独的线程中进行认真的处理。例如:

UserContrl1_LOadDataMethod()
{
    if(textbox1.text=="MyName") //<<======Now it wont give exception**
    {
        //Load data correspondin to "MyName"
        //Populate a globale variable List<string> which will be
        //bound to grid at some later stage
        if(InvokeRequired)
        {
            // after we've done all the processing, 
            this.Invoke(new MethodInvoker(delegate {
                // load the control with the appropriate data
            }));
            return;
        }
    }
}

例如，从UI线程的控件中获取文本:

Private Delegate Function GetControlTextInvoker(ByVal ctl As Control) As String

Private Function GetControlText(ByVal ctl As Control) As String
    Dim text As String

    If ctl.InvokeRequired Then
        text = CStr(ctl.Invoke(
            New GetControlTextInvoker(AddressOf GetControlText), ctl))
    Else
        text = ctl.Text
    End If

    Return text
End Function

this.Invoke(new MethodInvoker(delegate
            {
                //your code here;
            }));

使用Async/Await和回调的新外观。如果在项目中保留扩展方法，则只需要一行代码。

/// <summary>
/// A new way to use Tasks for Asynchronous calls
/// </summary>
public class Example
{
    /// <summary>
    /// No more delegates, background workers etc. just one line of code as shown below
    /// Note it is dependent on the XTask class shown next.
    /// </summary>
    public async void ExampleMethod()
    {
        //Still on GUI/Original Thread here
        //Do your updates before the next line of code
        await XTask.RunAsync(() =>
        {
            //Running an asynchronous task here
            //Cannot update GUI Thread here, but can do lots of work
        });
        //Can update GUI/Original thread on this line
    }
}

/// <summary>
/// A class containing extension methods for the Task class 
/// Put this file in folder named Extensions
/// Use prefix of X for the class it Extends
/// </summary>
public static class XTask
{
    /// <summary>
    /// RunAsync is an extension method that encapsulates the Task.Run using a callback
    /// </summary>
    /// <param name="Code">The caller is called back on the new Task (on a different thread)</param>
    /// <returns></returns>
    public async static Task RunAsync(Action Code)
    {
        await Task.Run(() =>
        {
            Code();
        });
        return;
    }
}

你可以在Extension方法中添加其他东西，比如用Try/Catch语句包装它，允许调用者告诉它在完成后返回什么类型，一个异常回调给调用者:

添加Try Catch，自动异常记录和回调

    /// <summary>
    /// Run Async
    /// </summary>
    /// <typeparam name="T">The type to return</typeparam>
    /// <param name="Code">The callback to the code</param>
    /// <param name="Error">The handled and logged exception if one occurs</param>
    /// <returns>The type expected as a competed task</returns>

    public async static Task<T> RunAsync<T>(Func<string,T> Code, Action<Exception> Error)
    {
       var done =  await Task<T>.Run(() =>
        {
            T result = default(T);
            try
            {
               result = Code("Code Here");
            }
            catch (Exception ex)
            {
                Console.WriteLine("Unhandled Exception: " + ex.Message);
                Console.WriteLine(ex.StackTrace);
                Error(ex);
            }
            return result;

        });
        return done;
    }
    public async void HowToUse()
    {
       //We now inject the type we want the async routine to return!
       var result =  await RunAsync<bool>((code) => {
           //write code here, all exceptions are logged via the wrapped try catch.
           //return what is needed
           return someBoolValue;
       }, 
       error => {

          //exceptions are already handled but are sent back here for further processing
       });
        if (result)
        {
            //we can now process the result because the code above awaited for the completion before
            //moving to this statement
        }
    }

这不是解决此错误的推荐方法，但您可以快速抑制它，它将完成工作。对于原型或演示，我更喜欢这样。添加

CheckForIllegalCrossThreadCalls = false

在Form1()构造函数中。

当我在xamarin工作室外的一个visual studio winforms原型项目中编程iOS-Phone单触摸应用程序控制器时，我发现了这个需求。比起xamarin studio，我更倾向于在VS中编程，我希望控制器能够与手机框架完全分离。通过这种方式，在Android和Windows Phone等其他框架上实现这个功能将更容易用于未来的使用。

我想要一种解决方案，使GUI可以响应事件，而无需处理每次单击按钮背后的跨线程切换代码。基本上让类控制器来处理，以保持客户端代码简单。你可能在GUI上有很多事件，如果你可以在类的一个地方处理它，会更干净。我不是一个多头专家，让我知道，如果这是有缺陷的。

public partial class Form1 : Form
{
    private ExampleController.MyController controller;

    public Form1()
    {          
        InitializeComponent();
        controller = new ExampleController.MyController((ISynchronizeInvoke) this);
        controller.Finished += controller_Finished;
    }

    void controller_Finished(string returnValue)
    {
        label1.Text = returnValue; 
    }

    private void button1_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
    {
        controller.SubmitTask("Do It");
    }
}

GUI表单不知道控制器正在运行异步任务。

public delegate void FinishedTasksHandler(string returnValue);

public class MyController
{
    private ISynchronizeInvoke _syn; 
    public MyController(ISynchronizeInvoke syn) {  _syn = syn; } 
    public event FinishedTasksHandler Finished; 

    public void SubmitTask(string someValue)
    {
        System.Threading.ThreadPool.QueueUserWorkItem(state => submitTask(someValue));
    }

    private void submitTask(string someValue)
    {
        someValue = someValue + " " + DateTime.Now.ToString();
        System.Threading.Thread.Sleep(5000);
//Finished(someValue); This causes cross threading error if called like this.

        if (Finished != null)
        {
            if (_syn.InvokeRequired)
            {
                _syn.Invoke(Finished, new object[] { someValue });
            }
            else
            {
                Finished(someValue);
            }
        }
    }
}