基准

我决定评估一些提交的选项,并比较其性能,以及使用一些新功能。

参考文本:

第一 7 行不应匹配,因为它们包含所搜索的表达式,而下 7 行应匹配!

Regex Hero is a real-time online Silverlight Regular Expression Tester.
XRegex Hero is a real-time online Silverlight Regular Expression Tester.
Regex HeroRegex HeroRegex HeroRegex HeroRegex Hero is a real-time online Silverlight Regular Expression Tester.
Regex Her Regex Her Regex Her Regex Her Regex Her Regex Her Regex Hero is a real-time online Silverlight Regular Expression Tester.
Regex Her is a real-time online Silverlight Regular Expression Tester.Regex Hero
egex Hero egex Hero egex Hero egex Hero egex Hero egex Hero Regex Hero is a real-time online Silverlight Regular Expression Tester.
RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRegex Hero is a real-time online Silverlight Regular Expression Tester.

Regex Her
egex Hero
egex Hero is a real-time online Silverlight Regular Expression Tester.
Regex Her is a real-time online Silverlight Regular Expression Tester.
Regex Her Regex Her Regex Her Regex Her Regex Her Regex Her is a real-time online Silverlight Regular Expression Tester.
Nobody is a real-time online Silverlight Regular Expression Tester.
Regex Her o egex Hero Regex  Hero Reg ex Hero is a real-time online Silverlight Regular Expression Tester.

结果:

结果是每秒以 3 轮的平均值 - 大数 = 更好

01: ^((?!Regex Hero).)*$                    3.914   // Accepted Answer
02: ^(?:(?!Regex Hero).)*$                  5.034   // With Non-Capturing group
03: ^(?!.*?Regex Hero).*                   7.356   // Lookahead at the beginning, if not found match everything
04: ^(?>[^R]+|R(?!egex Hero))*$             6.137   // Lookahead only on the right first letter
05: ^(?>(?:.*?Regex Hero)?)^.*$             7.426   // Match the word and check if you're still at linestart
06: ^(?(?=.*?Regex Hero)(?#fail)|.*)$       7.371   // Logic Branch: Find Regex Hero? match nothing, else anything

P1: ^(?(?=.*?Regex Hero)(*FAIL)|(*ACCEPT))  ?????   // Logic Branch in Perl - Quick FAIL
P2: .*?Regex Hero(*COMMIT)(*FAIL)|(*ACCEPT) ?????   // Direct COMMIT & FAIL in Perl

由于.NET 不支持操作 Verbs (*FAIL 等) 我无法测试 P1 和 P2 解决方案。

总结:

总的来说,最可读和最快的解决方案似乎是03与一个简单的负面视图,这也是JavaScript的最快的解决方案,因为JS不支持其他解决方案的更先进的Regex功能。

不是雷格斯,但我发现使用带管的序列粘贴是合乎逻辑和有用的,以消除噪音。

例如,搜索一个 Apache 配置文件,没有所有评论 -

grep -v '\#' /opt/lampp/etc/httpd.conf      # this gives all the non-comment lines

和

grep -v '\#' /opt/lampp/etc/httpd.conf |  grep -i dir

序列格雷普的逻辑是(不是一个评论)和(比赛是)

请注意,解决方案不会从“现在”开始:

^(?!hede).*$

一般来说,它比解决方案不包含“这些”的更有效:

^((?!hede).)*$

前者只在输入行的第一个位置检查“点”而不是每个位置。

下面的功能将帮助您获得所需的产量

<?PHP
      function removePrepositions($text){

            $propositions=array('/\bfor\b/i','/\bthe\b/i'); 

            if( count($propositions) > 0 ) {
                foreach($propositions as $exceptionPhrase) {
                    $text = preg_replace($exceptionPhrase, '', trim($text));

                }
            $retval = trim($text);

            }
        return $retval;
    }


?>

答案非常好,只是一个学术点:

计算机科学的理论意义上的常规表达是不可能这样做的,对他们来说,它应该看起来像这样:

^([^h].*$)|(h([^e].*$|$))|(he([^h].*$|$))|(heh([^e].*$|$))|(hehe.+$) 

这只是一场完整的比赛,做下一场比赛会更可怕。

用此,你避免在每个位置测试一个 lookahead:

/^(?:[^h]+|h++(?!ede))*+$/

相当于(为.net ):

^(?>(?:[^h]+|h+(?!ede))*)$

老答案:

/^(?>[^h]+|h+(?!ede))*$/