最简单和逻辑的解决方案，比较一切像对象，数组，字符串，Int…

JSON。stringify({a: val1}) == JSON。stringify ({a: val2})

注意:

你需要用你的Object替换val1和val2 对于对象，必须对两侧对象进行递归排序(按键)

let std1 = {
  name: "Abhijeet",
  roll: 1
}

let std2 = {
  name: "Siddharth",
  roll: 2
}

console.log(JSON.stringify(std1) === JSON.stringify(std2))

这是一个通用的相等检查函数，它接收数组元素作为输入，并将它们相互比较。适用于所有类型的元素。

const isEqual = function(inputs = []) {
  // Checks an element if js object.
  const isObject = function(data) {
    return Object.prototype.toString.call(data) === '[object Object]';
  };
  // Sorts given object by its keys.
  const sortObjectByKey = function(obj) {
    const self = this;
    if (!obj) return {};
    return Object.keys(obj).sort().reduce((initialVal, item) => {
      initialVal[item] = !Array.isArray(obj[item]) &&
        typeof obj[item] === 'object'
        ? self.objectByKey(obj[item])
        : obj[item];
      return initialVal;
    }, {});
  };

  // Checks equality of all elements in the input against each other. Returns true | false
  return (
    inputs
      .map(
        input =>
          typeof input == 'undefined'
            ? ''
            : isObject(input)
                ? JSON.stringify(sortObjectByKey(input))
                : JSON.stringify(input)
      )
      .reduce(
        (prevValue, input) =>
          prevValue === '' || prevValue === input ? input : false,
        ''
      ) !== false
  );
};

// Tests (Made with Jest test framework.)
test('String equality check', () => {
  expect(isEqual(['murat'])).toEqual(true);
  expect(isEqual(['murat', 'john', 'doe'])).toEqual(false);
  expect(isEqual(['murat', 'murat', 'murat'])).toEqual(true);
});

test('Float equality check', () => {
  expect(isEqual([7.89, 3.45])).toEqual(false);
  expect(isEqual([7, 7.50])).toEqual(false);
  expect(isEqual([7.50, 7.50])).toEqual(true);
  expect(isEqual([7, 7])).toEqual(true);
  expect(isEqual([0.34, 0.33])).toEqual(false);
  expect(isEqual([0.33, 0.33])).toEqual(true);
});

test('Array equality check', () => {
  expect(isEqual([[1, 2, 3], [1, 2, 3]])).toEqual(true);
  expect(isEqual([[1, 3], [1, 2, 3]])).toEqual(false);
  expect(isEqual([['murat', 18], ['murat', 18]])).toEqual(true);
});

test('Object equality check', () => {
  let obj1 = {
    name: 'murat',
    age: 18
  };
  let obj2 = {
    name: 'murat',
    age: 18
  };
  let obj3 = {
    age: 18,
    name: 'murat'
  };
  let obj4 = {
    name: 'murat',
    age: 18,
    occupation: 'nothing'
  };
  expect(isEqual([obj1, obj2])).toEqual(true);
  expect(isEqual([obj1, obj2, obj3])).toEqual(true);
  expect(isEqual([obj1, obj2, obj3, obj4])).toEqual(false);
});

test('Weird equality checks', () => {
  expect(isEqual(['', {}])).toEqual(false);
  expect(isEqual([0, '0'])).toEqual(false);
});

这里还有一个要点

下面是ES6/ES2015中使用函数式方法的解决方案:

const typeOf = x => 
  ({}).toString
      .call(x)
      .match(/\[object (\w+)\]/)[1]

function areSimilar(a, b) {
  const everyKey = f => Object.keys(a).every(f)

  switch(typeOf(a)) {
    case 'Array':
      return a.length === b.length &&
        everyKey(k => areSimilar(a.sort()[k], b.sort()[k]));
    case 'Object':
      return Object.keys(a).length === Object.keys(b).length &&
        everyKey(k => areSimilar(a[k], b[k]));
    default:
      return a === b;
  }
}

这里有演示

只是想利用一些es6的特性来贡献我的对象比较版本。它不考虑订单。在将所有if/else转换为三元后，我带来了以下内容:

function areEqual(obj1, obj2) {

    return Object.keys(obj1).every(key => {

            return obj2.hasOwnProperty(key) ?
                typeof obj1[key] === 'object' ?
                    areEqual(obj1[key], obj2[key]) :
                obj1[key] === obj2[key] :
                false;

        }
    )
}

这取决于你对平等的定义。因此，作为类的开发人员，要由您来定义它们的相等性。

有时会使用一种情况，如果两个实例指向内存中的相同位置，则认为它们是“相等的”，但这并不总是您想要的。例如，如果我有一个Person类，如果两个Person对象具有相同的Last Name、First Name和Social Security Number(即使它们指向内存中的不同位置)，我可能会认为它们是“相等的”。

另一方面，我们不能简单地说两个对象是相等的，如果它们的每个成员的值都相同，因为，有时，你并不想这样。换句话说，对于每个类，由类开发人员定义组成对象“标识”的成员并开发适当的相等操作符(通过重载==操作符或Equals方法)。

Saying that two objects are equal if they have the same hash is one way out. However you then have to wonder how the hash is calculated for each instance. Going back to the Person example above, we could use this system if the hash was calculated by looking at the values of the First Name, Last Name, and Social Security Number fields. On top of that, we are then relying on the quality of the hashing method (that's a huge topic on its own, but suffice it to say that not all hashes are created equal, and bad hashing methods can lead to more collisions, which in this case would return false matches).