我也遇到了同样的问题，并决定自己编写解决方案。但是因为我也想比较数组和对象，反之亦然，所以我设计了一个通用的解决方案。我决定将函数添加到原型中，但是可以很容易地将它们重写为独立的函数。代码如下:

Array.prototype.equals = Object.prototype.equals = function(b) {
    var ar = JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(b));
    var err = false;
    for(var key in this) {
        if(this.hasOwnProperty(key)) {
            var found = ar.find(this[key]);
            if(found > -1) {
                if(Object.prototype.toString.call(ar) === "[object Object]") {
                    delete ar[Object.keys(ar)[found]];
                }
                else {
                    ar.splice(found, 1);
                }
            }
            else {
                err = true;
                break;
            }
        }
    };
    if(Object.keys(ar).length > 0 || err) {
        return false;
    }
    return true;
}

Array.prototype.find = Object.prototype.find = function(v) {
    var f = -1;
    for(var i in this) {
        if(this.hasOwnProperty(i)) {
            if(Object.prototype.toString.call(this[i]) === "[object Array]" || Object.prototype.toString.call(this[i]) === "[object Object]") {
                if(this[i].equals(v)) {
                    f = (typeof(i) == "number") ? i : Object.keys(this).indexOf(i);
                }
            }
            else if(this[i] === v) {
                f = (typeof(i) == "number") ? i : Object.keys(this).indexOf(i);
            }
        }
    }
    return f;
}

本算法分为两部分;equals函数本身和一个在数组/对象中查找属性数值索引的函数。find函数只需要，因为indexof只查找数字和字符串，不查找对象。

我们可以这样称呼它:

({a: 1, b: "h"}).equals({a: 1, b: "h"});

函数返回true或false，在本例中为true。 算法als允许在非常复杂的对象之间进行比较:

({a: 1, b: "hello", c: ["w", "o", "r", "l", "d", {answer1: "should be", answer2: true}]}).equals({b: "hello", a: 1, c: ["w", "d", "o", "r", {answer1: "should be", answer2: true}, "l"]})

上面的例子将返回true，即使属性的顺序不同。需要注意的一个小细节:这段代码还检查两个变量的相同类型，因此“3”与3不同。

如果您有一个方便的深度复制函数，您可以使用下面的技巧来使用JSON。Stringify同时匹配属性的顺序:

function equals(obj1, obj2) {
    function _equals(obj1, obj2) {
        return JSON.stringify(obj1)
            === JSON.stringify($.extend(true, {}, obj1, obj2));
    }
    return _equals(obj1, obj2) && _equals(obj2, obj1);
}

演示:http://jsfiddle.net/CU3vb/3/

理由是:

由于obj1的属性被逐个复制到克隆中，因此它们在克隆中的顺序将被保留。当obj2的属性被复制到克隆对象时，因为obj1中已经存在的属性将被简单地覆盖，它们在克隆对象中的顺序将被保留。

我不是Javascript专家，但这里有一个简单的解决方法。我检查三件事:

它是一个对象，而且它不是null，因为typeof null是对象。 如果两个对象的属性计数相同?否则它们就不相等。 遍历一个对象的属性，并检查对应的属性在第二个对象中是否具有相同的值。

function deepEqual (first, second) { // Not equal if either is not an object or is null. if (!isObject(first) || !isObject(second) ) return false; // If properties count is different if (keys(first).length != keys(second).length) return false; // Return false if any property value is different. for(prop in first){ if (first[prop] != second[prop]) return false; } return true; } // Checks if argument is an object and is not null function isObject(obj) { return (typeof obj === "object" && obj != null); } // returns arrays of object keys function keys (obj) { result = []; for(var key in obj){ result.push(key); } return result; } // Some test code obj1 = { name: 'Singh', age: 20 } obj2 = { age: 20, name: 'Singh' } obj3 = { name: 'Kaur', age: 19 } console.log(deepEqual(obj1, obj2)); console.log(deepEqual(obj1, obj3));

只是想利用一些es6的特性来贡献我的对象比较版本。它不考虑订单。在将所有if/else转换为三元后，我带来了以下内容:

function areEqual(obj1, obj2) {

    return Object.keys(obj1).every(key => {

            return obj2.hasOwnProperty(key) ?
                typeof obj1[key] === 'object' ?
                    areEqual(obj1[key], obj2[key]) :
                obj1[key] === obj2[key] :
                false;

        }
    )
}

这取决于你对平等的定义。因此，作为类的开发人员，要由您来定义它们的相等性。

有时会使用一种情况，如果两个实例指向内存中的相同位置，则认为它们是“相等的”，但这并不总是您想要的。例如，如果我有一个Person类，如果两个Person对象具有相同的Last Name、First Name和Social Security Number(即使它们指向内存中的不同位置)，我可能会认为它们是“相等的”。

另一方面，我们不能简单地说两个对象是相等的，如果它们的每个成员的值都相同，因为，有时，你并不想这样。换句话说，对于每个类，由类开发人员定义组成对象“标识”的成员并开发适当的相等操作符(通过重载==操作符或Equals方法)。

Saying that two objects are equal if they have the same hash is one way out. However you then have to wonder how the hash is calculated for each instance. Going back to the Person example above, we could use this system if the hash was calculated by looking at the values of the First Name, Last Name, and Social Security Number fields. On top of that, we are then relying on the quality of the hashing method (that's a huge topic on its own, but suffice it to say that not all hashes are created equal, and bad hashing methods can lead to more collisions, which in this case would return false matches).

这是一个非常干净的CoffeeScript版本，你可以这样做:

Object::equals = (other) ->
  typeOf = Object::toString

  return false if typeOf.call(this) isnt typeOf.call(other)
  return `this == other` unless typeOf.call(other) is '[object Object]' or
                                typeOf.call(other) is '[object Array]'

  (return false unless this[key].equals other[key]) for key, value of this
  (return false if typeof this[key] is 'undefined') for key of other

  true

下面是测试:

  describe "equals", ->

    it "should consider two numbers to be equal", ->
      assert 5.equals(5)

    it "should consider two empty objects to be equal", ->
      assert {}.equals({})

    it "should consider two objects with one key to be equal", ->
      assert {a: "banana"}.equals {a: "banana"}

    it "should consider two objects with keys in different orders to be equal", ->
      assert {a: "banana", kendall: "garrus"}.equals {kendall: "garrus", a: "banana"}

    it "should consider two objects with nested objects to be equal", ->
      assert {a: {fruit: "banana"}}.equals {a: {fruit: "banana"}}

    it "should consider two objects with nested objects that are jumbled to be equal", ->
      assert {a: {a: "banana", kendall: "garrus"}}.equals {a: {kendall: "garrus", a: "banana"}}

    it "should consider two objects with arrays as values to be equal", ->
      assert {a: ["apple", "banana"]}.equals {a: ["apple", "banana"]}



    it "should not consider an object to be equal to null", ->
      assert !({a: "banana"}.equals null)

    it "should not consider two objects with different keys to be equal", ->
      assert !({a: "banana"}.equals {})

    it "should not consider two objects with different values to be equal", ->
      assert !({a: "banana"}.equals {a: "grapefruit"})