严格相等运算符将告诉您两个对象类型是否相等。然而,是否有一种方法来判断两个对象是否相等,就像Java中的哈希码值一样?

堆栈溢出问题JavaScript中有hashCode函数吗?类似于这个问题,但需要一个更学术的答案。上面的场景说明了为什么有必要有一个,我想知道是否有等效的解决方案。


当前回答

我对这个函数做如下假设:

你控制你比较的对象,你只有基本的值(例如。而不是嵌套的对象、函数等)。 您的浏览器支持Object.keys。

这应该被视为一个简单策略的示范。

/**
 * Checks the equality of two objects that contain primitive values. (ie. no nested objects, functions, etc.)
 * @param {Object} object1
 * @param {Object} object2
 * @param {Boolean} [order_matters] Affects the return value of unordered objects. (ex. {a:1, b:2} and {b:2, a:1}).
 * @returns {Boolean}
 */
function isEqual( object1, object2, order_matters ) {
    var keys1 = Object.keys(object1),
        keys2 = Object.keys(object2),
        i, key;

    // Test 1: Same number of elements
    if( keys1.length != keys2.length ) {
        return false;
    }

    // If order doesn't matter isEqual({a:2, b:1}, {b:1, a:2}) should return true.
    // keys1 = Object.keys({a:2, b:1}) = ["a","b"];
    // keys2 = Object.keys({b:1, a:2}) = ["b","a"];
    // This is why we are sorting keys1 and keys2.
    if( !order_matters ) {
        keys1.sort();
        keys2.sort();
    }

    // Test 2: Same keys
    for( i = 0; i < keys1.length; i++ ) {
        if( keys1[i] != keys2[i] ) {
            return false;
        }
    }

    // Test 3: Values
    for( i = 0; i < keys1.length; i++ ) {
        key = keys1[i];
        if( object1[key] != object2[key] ) {
            return false;
        }
    }

    return true;
}

其他回答

你可以使用_。isEqual(obj1, obj2)来自underscore.js库。

这里有一个例子:

var stooge = {name: 'moe', luckyNumbers: [13, 27, 34]};
var clone  = {name: 'moe', luckyNumbers: [13, 27, 34]};
stooge == clone;
=> false
_.isEqual(stooge, clone);
=> true

在这里查看官方文档:http://underscorejs.org/#isEqual

简短的回答

简单的答案是:不,没有一般的方法来确定一个对象等于另一个你所指的意义。例外情况是当您严格地认为一个对象是无类型的。

长话短说

这个概念是一个Equals方法,它比较一个对象的两个不同实例,以指示它们在值级别上是否相等。但是,定义Equals方法应该如何实现取决于具体的类型。对具有基本值的属性进行迭代比较可能还不够:对象可能包含与相等无关的属性。例如,

 function MyClass(a, b)
 {
     var c;
     this.getCLazy = function() {
         if (c === undefined) c = a * b // imagine * is really expensive
         return c;
     }
  }

在上面的例子中,c对于确定MyClass的任何两个实例是否相等并不重要,只有a和b是重要的。在某些情况下,c可能在不同实例之间有所不同,但在比较中并不显著。

注意,当成员本身也可能是某个类型的实例,并且每个实例都需要有确定相等的方法时,这个问题就会出现。

更复杂的是,在JavaScript中,数据和方法之间的区别是模糊的。

一个对象可以引用一个作为事件处理程序调用的方法,这可能不被认为是其“值状态”的一部分。然而,另一个对象很可能被分配一个执行重要计算的函数,从而使这个实例与其他实例不同,仅仅因为它引用了不同的函数。

如果一个对象的现有原型方法被另一个函数覆盖,该怎么办?它还能被认为与另一个相同的实例相等吗?这个问题只能在每种类型的具体情况下回答。

如前所述,异常将是一个严格的无类型对象。在这种情况下,唯一明智的选择是对每个成员进行迭代和递归比较。即使这样,人们也要问一个函数的“值”是什么?

排序对象(字典) 比较JSON字符串 函数areTwoDictsEqual(dictA, dictB) { 函数sortDict(dict) { var keys = Object.keys(dict); keys.sort (); var newDict = {}; For (var i=0;我< keys.length;我+ +){ Var key = keys[i]; Var值= dict[key]; newDict[key] = value; } 返回newDict; } 返回JSON.stringify(sortDict(dictA)) == JSON.stringify(sortDict(dictB)); }

这是一个通用的相等检查函数,它接收数组元素作为输入,并将它们相互比较。适用于所有类型的元素。

const isEqual = function(inputs = []) {
  // Checks an element if js object.
  const isObject = function(data) {
    return Object.prototype.toString.call(data) === '[object Object]';
  };
  // Sorts given object by its keys.
  const sortObjectByKey = function(obj) {
    const self = this;
    if (!obj) return {};
    return Object.keys(obj).sort().reduce((initialVal, item) => {
      initialVal[item] = !Array.isArray(obj[item]) &&
        typeof obj[item] === 'object'
        ? self.objectByKey(obj[item])
        : obj[item];
      return initialVal;
    }, {});
  };

  // Checks equality of all elements in the input against each other. Returns true | false
  return (
    inputs
      .map(
        input =>
          typeof input == 'undefined'
            ? ''
            : isObject(input)
                ? JSON.stringify(sortObjectByKey(input))
                : JSON.stringify(input)
      )
      .reduce(
        (prevValue, input) =>
          prevValue === '' || prevValue === input ? input : false,
        ''
      ) !== false
  );
};

// Tests (Made with Jest test framework.)
test('String equality check', () => {
  expect(isEqual(['murat'])).toEqual(true);
  expect(isEqual(['murat', 'john', 'doe'])).toEqual(false);
  expect(isEqual(['murat', 'murat', 'murat'])).toEqual(true);
});

test('Float equality check', () => {
  expect(isEqual([7.89, 3.45])).toEqual(false);
  expect(isEqual([7, 7.50])).toEqual(false);
  expect(isEqual([7.50, 7.50])).toEqual(true);
  expect(isEqual([7, 7])).toEqual(true);
  expect(isEqual([0.34, 0.33])).toEqual(false);
  expect(isEqual([0.33, 0.33])).toEqual(true);
});

test('Array equality check', () => {
  expect(isEqual([[1, 2, 3], [1, 2, 3]])).toEqual(true);
  expect(isEqual([[1, 3], [1, 2, 3]])).toEqual(false);
  expect(isEqual([['murat', 18], ['murat', 18]])).toEqual(true);
});

test('Object equality check', () => {
  let obj1 = {
    name: 'murat',
    age: 18
  };
  let obj2 = {
    name: 'murat',
    age: 18
  };
  let obj3 = {
    age: 18,
    name: 'murat'
  };
  let obj4 = {
    name: 'murat',
    age: 18,
    occupation: 'nothing'
  };
  expect(isEqual([obj1, obj2])).toEqual(true);
  expect(isEqual([obj1, obj2, obj3])).toEqual(true);
  expect(isEqual([obj1, obj2, obj3, obj4])).toEqual(false);
});

test('Weird equality checks', () => {
  expect(isEqual(['', {}])).toEqual(false);
  expect(isEqual([0, '0'])).toEqual(false);
});

这里还有一个要点

从我的个人库中取出,我经常用它来工作。下面的函数是一个宽大的递归深度等号,它不检查

阶级平等 继承的值 价值观严格平等

我主要用这个来检查我是否得到了对各种API实现的相等的回复。可能会出现实现差异(如字符串与数字)和额外的空值。

它的实现非常简单(如果去掉所有注释的话)

/** Recursively check if both objects are equal in value *** *** This function is designed to use multiple methods from most probable *** (and in most cases) valid, to the more regid and complex method. *** *** One of the main principles behind the various check is that while *** some of the simpler checks such as == or JSON may cause false negatives, *** they do not cause false positives. As such they can be safely run first. *** *** # !Important Note: *** as this function is designed for simplified deep equal checks it is not designed *** for the following *** *** - Class equality, (ClassA().a = 1) maybe valid to (ClassB().b = 1) *** - Inherited values, this actually ignores them *** - Values being strictly equal, "1" is equal to 1 (see the basic equality check on this) *** - Performance across all cases. This is designed for high performance on the *** most probable cases of == / JSON equality. Consider bench testing, if you have *** more 'complex' requirments *** *** @param objA : First object to compare *** @param objB : 2nd object to compare *** @param .... : Any other objects to compare *** *** @returns true if all equals, or false if invalid *** *** @license Copyright by eugene@picoded.com, 2012. *** Licensed under the MIT license: http://opensource.org/licenses/MIT **/ function simpleRecusiveDeepEqual(objA, objB) { // Multiple comparision check //-------------------------------------------- var args = Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments); if(args.length > 2) { for(var a=1; a<args.length; ++a) { if(!simpleRecusiveDeepEqual(args[a-1], args[a])) { return false; } } return true; } else if(args.length < 2) { throw "simpleRecusiveDeepEqual, requires atleast 2 arguments"; } // basic equality check, //-------------------------------------------- // if this succed the 2 basic values is equal, // such as numbers and string. // // or its actually the same object pointer. Bam // // Note that if string and number strictly equal is required // change the equality from ==, to === // if(objA == objB) { return true; } // If a value is a bsic type, and failed above. This fails var basicTypes = ["boolean", "number", "string"]; if( basicTypes.indexOf(typeof objA) >= 0 || basicTypes.indexOf(typeof objB) >= 0 ) { return false; } // JSON equality check, //-------------------------------------------- // this can fail, if the JSON stringify the objects in the wrong order // for example the following may fail, due to different string order: // // JSON.stringify( {a:1, b:2} ) == JSON.stringify( {b:2, a:1} ) // if(JSON.stringify(objA) == JSON.stringify(objB)) { return true; } // Array equality check //-------------------------------------------- // This is performed prior to iteration check, // Without this check the following would have been considered valid // // simpleRecusiveDeepEqual( { 0:1963 }, [1963] ); // // Note that u may remove this segment if this is what is intended // if( Array.isArray(objA) ) { //objA is array, objB is not an array if( !Array.isArray(objB) ) { return false; } } else if( Array.isArray(objB) ) { //objA is not array, objB is an array return false; } // Nested values iteration //-------------------------------------------- // Scan and iterate all the nested values, and check for non equal values recusively // // Note that this does not check against null equality, remove the various "!= null" // if this is required var i; //reuse var to iterate // Check objA values against objB for (i in objA) { //Protect against inherited properties if(objA.hasOwnProperty(i)) { if(objB.hasOwnProperty(i)) { // Check if deep equal is valid if(!simpleRecusiveDeepEqual( objA[i], objB[i] )) { return false; } } else if(objA[i] != null) { //ignore null values in objA, that objB does not have //else fails return false; } } } // Check if objB has additional values, that objA do not, fail if so for (i in objB) { if(objB.hasOwnProperty(i)) { if(objB[i] != null && !objA.hasOwnProperty(i)) { //ignore null values in objB, that objA does not have //else fails return false; } } } // End of all checks //-------------------------------------------- // By reaching here, all iteration scans have been done. // and should have returned false if it failed return true; } // Sanity checking of simpleRecusiveDeepEqual (function() { if( // Basic checks !simpleRecusiveDeepEqual({}, {}) || !simpleRecusiveDeepEqual([], []) || !simpleRecusiveDeepEqual(['a'], ['a']) || // Not strict checks !simpleRecusiveDeepEqual("1", 1) || // Multiple objects check !simpleRecusiveDeepEqual( { a:[1,2] }, { a:[1,2] }, { a:[1,2] } ) || // Ensure distinction between array and object (the following should fail) simpleRecusiveDeepEqual( [1963], { 0:1963 } ) || // Null strict checks simpleRecusiveDeepEqual( 0, null ) || simpleRecusiveDeepEqual( "", null ) || // Last "false" exists to make the various check above easy to comment in/out false ) { alert("FATAL ERROR: simpleRecusiveDeepEqual failed basic checks"); } else { //added this last line, for SO snippet alert on success alert("simpleRecusiveDeepEqual: Passed all checks, Yays!"); } })();