是的，我经常使用它——它对多线程代码非常有用。你指的那篇文章很好。不过有两件重要的事情要记住:

You should only use volatile if you completely understand what it does and how it differs to synchronized. In many situations volatile appears, on the surface, to be a simpler more performant alternative to synchronized, when often a better understanding of volatile would make clear that synchronized is the only option that would work. volatile doesn't actually work in a lot of older JVMs, although synchronized does. I remember seeing a document that referenced the various levels of support in different JVMs but unfortunately I can't find it now. Definitely look into it if you're using Java pre 1.5 or if you don't have control over the JVMs that your program will be running on.

下面是一个非常简单的代码，演示了volatile for variable的需求，它用于从其他线程控制线程执行(这是需要volatile的一个场景)。

// Code to prove importance of 'volatile' when state of one thread is being mutated from another thread.
// Try running this class with and without 'volatile' for 'state' property of Task class.
public class VolatileTest {
    public static void main(String[] a) throws Exception {
        Task task = new Task();
        new Thread(task).start();

        Thread.sleep(500);
        long stoppedOn = System.nanoTime();

        task.stop(); // -----> do this to stop the thread

        System.out.println("Stopping on: " + stoppedOn);
    }
}

class Task implements Runnable {
    // Try running with and without 'volatile' here
    private volatile boolean state = true;
    private int i = 0;

    public void stop() {
        state = false;
    } 

    @Override
    public void run() {
        while(state) {
            i++;
        }
        System.out.println(i + "> Stopped on: " + System.nanoTime());
    }
}

当不使用volatile时:即使在“stop on: xxx”之后，你也永远不会看到“Stopped on: xxx”消息，并且程序继续运行。

Stopping on: 1895303906650500

当使用volatile时:你会立即看到'Stopped on: xxx'。

Stopping on: 1895285647980000
324565439> Stopped on: 1895285648087300

演示:https://repl.it/repls/SilverAgonizingObjectcode

如果您有一个多线程系统，这些多线程处理一些共享数据，这些线程将在它们自己的缓存中加载数据。如果我们不锁定资源，在一个线程中所做的任何更改都不会在另一个线程中可用。

使用锁定机制，我们可以添加对数据源的读/写访问。如果一个线程修改了数据源，该数据将存储在主存中而不是它的缓存中。当其他线程需要这个数据时，它们将从主存中读取它。这将显著增加延迟。

为了减少延迟，我们将变量声明为volatile。这意味着无论何时变量的值在任何处理器中被修改，其他线程都将被迫读取它。它仍然有一些延迟，但比从主存中读取要好。

是的，我经常使用它——它对多线程代码非常有用。你指的那篇文章很好。不过有两件重要的事情要记住:

You should only use volatile if you completely understand what it does and how it differs to synchronized. In many situations volatile appears, on the surface, to be a simpler more performant alternative to synchronized, when often a better understanding of volatile would make clear that synchronized is the only option that would work. volatile doesn't actually work in a lot of older JVMs, although synchronized does. I remember seeing a document that referenced the various levels of support in different JVMs but unfortunately I can't find it now. Definitely look into it if you're using Java pre 1.5 or if you don't have control over the JVMs that your program will be running on.

绝对是的。(不仅是Java, c#也是如此。)有时，您需要获取或设置一个值，该值保证是给定平台上的原子操作，例如int或boolean，但不需要线程锁定的开销。volatile关键字允许您确保在读取值时获得的是当前值，而不是在另一个线程上写入时被废弃的缓存值。

虽然我在这里提到的答案中看到了许多很好的理论解释，但我在这里添加了一个实际的例子来解释:

1.

代码在不使用volatile的情况下运行

public class VisibilityDemonstration {

private static int sCount = 0;

public static void main(String[] args) {
    new Consumer().start();
    try {
        Thread.sleep(100);
    } catch (InterruptedException e) {
        return;
    }
    new Producer().start();
}

static class Consumer extends Thread {
    @Override
    public void run() {
        int localValue = -1;
        while (true) {
            if (localValue != sCount) {
                System.out.println("Consumer: detected count change " + sCount);
                localValue = sCount;
            }
            if (sCount >= 5) {
                break;
            }
        }
        System.out.println("Consumer: terminating");
    }
}

static class Producer extends Thread {
    @Override
    public void run() {
        while (sCount < 5) {
            int localValue = sCount;
            localValue++;
            System.out.println("Producer: incrementing count to " + localValue);
            sCount = localValue;
            try {
                Thread.sleep(1000);
            } catch (InterruptedException e) {
                return;
            }
        }
        System.out.println("Producer: terminating");
    }
}
}

在上面的代码中，有两个线程——生产者和消费者。

生产者线程在循环中迭代5次(睡眠时间为1000毫秒或1秒)。在每次迭代中，生产者线程将sCount变量的值增加1。因此，在所有迭代中，生产者将sCount的值从0更改为5

使用者线程处于一个常量循环中，每当sCount的值发生变化时，它就会打印，直到值达到5为止。

两个循环同时开始。因此，生产者和消费者都应该将sCount的值打印5次。

输出

Consumer: detected count change 0
Producer: incrementing count to 1
Producer: incrementing count to 2
Producer: incrementing count to 3
Producer: incrementing count to 4
Producer: incrementing count to 5
Producer: terminating

分析

In the above program, when the producer thread updates the value of sCount, it does update the value of the variable in the main memory(memory from where every thread is going to initially read the value of variable). But the consumer thread reads the value of sCount only the first time from this main memory and then caches the value of that variable inside its own memory. So, even if the value of original sCount in main memory has been updated by the producer thread, the consumer thread is reading from its cached value which is not updated. This is called VISIBILITY PROBLEM .

2.

代码使用volatile运行

在上面的代码中，用下面的代码替换声明了sCount的代码行:

private volatile  static int sCount = 0;

输出

Consumer: detected count change 0
Producer: incrementing count to 1
Consumer: detected count change 1
Producer: incrementing count to 2
Consumer: detected count change 2
Producer: incrementing count to 3
Consumer: detected count change 3
Producer: incrementing count to 4
Consumer: detected count change 4
Producer: incrementing count to 5
Consumer: detected count change 5
Consumer: terminating
Producer: terminating

分析

当我们声明一个变量为volatile时，这意味着所有对这个变量的读写操作都将直接进入主存。这些变量的值永远不会被缓存。

由于sCount变量的值永远不会被任何线程缓存，消费者总是从主内存中读取sCount的原始值(在那里由生产者线程更新)。因此，在这种情况下，输出是正确的，两个线程都打印了5次不同的sCount值。

通过这种方式，volatile关键字解决了可见性问题。