如果您正在开发多线程应用程序，您将需要使用'volatile'关键字或'synchronized'以及您可能拥有的任何其他并发控制工具和技术。桌面应用就是这样一个例子。

If you are developing an application that would be deployed to application server (Tomcat, JBoss AS, Glassfish, etc) you don't have to handle concurrency control yourself as it already addressed by the application server. In fact, if I remembered correctly the Java EE standard prohibit any concurrency control in servlets and EJBs, since it is part of the 'infrastructure' layer which you supposed to be freed from handling it. You only do concurrency control in such app if you're implementing singleton objects. This even already addressed if you knit your components using frameworkd like Spring.

因此，在Java开发的大多数情况下，应用程序是一个web应用程序，并使用IoC框架，如Spring或EJB，你不需要使用'volatile'。

Volatile变量是轻量级同步。当所有线程之间的最新数据可见性是必需的，并且原子性可能会受到损害时，在这种情况下，Volatile变量必须是首选。对volatile变量的读取总是返回任何线程最近完成的写操作，因为它们既不缓存在寄存器中，也不缓存在其他处理器看不到的缓存中。Volatile是无锁的。当场景满足上面提到的条件时，我使用volatile。

用volatile关键字声明的变量有两个主要特性，这使得它很特殊。

如果我们有一个易失性变量，它不能被任何线程缓存到计算机的(微处理器)缓存内存中。访问总是发生在主存中。 如果对一个易失性变量正在进行写操作，并且突然请求了一个读操作，那么可以保证写操作将在读操作之前完成。

以上两个品质推断了这一点

所有读取volatile变量的线程肯定会读取最新的值。因为没有缓存值可以污染它。而且读请求只有在当前写操作完成后才会被授予。

另一方面，

如果我们进一步研究我提到的#2，我们可以看到volatile关键字是维护一个共享变量的理想方法，它有n个读线程，只有一个写线程可以访问它。一旦我们添加了volatile关键字，就完成了。没有任何线程安全方面的开销。

交谈,

我们不能仅仅使用volatile关键字来满足有多个写入线程访问它的共享变量。

The volatile key when used with a variable, will make sure that threads reading this variable will see the same value . Now if you have multiple threads reading and writing to a variable, making the variable volatile will not be enough and data will be corrupted . Image threads have read the same value but each one has done some chages (say incremented a counter) , when writing back to the memory, data integrity is violated . That is why it is necessary to make the varible synchronized (diffrent ways are possible)

如果修改是由一个线程完成的，而其他线程只需要读取这个值，则volatile将是合适的。

是的，我经常使用它——它对多线程代码非常有用。你指的那篇文章很好。不过有两件重要的事情要记住:

You should only use volatile if you completely understand what it does and how it differs to synchronized. In many situations volatile appears, on the surface, to be a simpler more performant alternative to synchronized, when often a better understanding of volatile would make clear that synchronized is the only option that would work. volatile doesn't actually work in a lot of older JVMs, although synchronized does. I remember seeing a document that referenced the various levels of support in different JVMs but unfortunately I can't find it now. Definitely look into it if you're using Java pre 1.5 or if you don't have control over the JVMs that your program will be running on.

每个访问volatile字段的线程在继续之前都会读取它的当前值，而不是(可能)使用缓存的值。

只有成员变量可以是易变的或瞬变的。