Volatile执行以下操作。

不同线程对volatile变量的读写总是从内存，而不是从线程自己的缓存或cpu寄存器。所以每个线程总是处理最新的值。 2>当两个不同的线程在堆中使用相同的实例或静态变量时，其中一个线程可能会认为其他线程的操作是无序的。请看jeremy manson的博客。但不稳定在这里有所帮助。

下面完全运行的代码展示了如何在不使用synchronized关键字的情况下以预定义的顺序执行多个线程并打印输出。

thread 0 prints 0
thread 1 prints 1
thread 2 prints 2
thread 3 prints 3
thread 0 prints 0
thread 1 prints 1
thread 2 prints 2
thread 3 prints 3
thread 0 prints 0
thread 1 prints 1
thread 2 prints 2
thread 3 prints 3

为了实现这一点，我们可以使用以下完整的运行代码。

public class Solution {
    static volatile int counter = 0;
    static int print = 0;
    public static void main(String[] args) {
        // TODO Auto-generated method stub
        Thread[] ths = new Thread[4];
        for (int i = 0; i < ths.length; i++) {
            ths[i] = new Thread(new MyRunnable(i, ths.length));
            ths[i].start();
        }
    }
    static class MyRunnable implements Runnable {
        final int thID;
        final int total;
        public MyRunnable(int id, int total) {
            thID = id;
            this.total = total;
        }
        @Override
        public void run() {
            // TODO Auto-generated method stub
            while (true) {
                if (thID == counter) {
                    System.out.println("thread " + thID + " prints " + print);
                    print++;
                    if (print == total)
                        print = 0;
                    counter++;
                    if (counter == total)
                        counter = 0;
                } else {
                    try {
                        Thread.sleep(30);
                    } catch (InterruptedException e) {
                        // log it
                    }
                }
            }
        }
    }
}

下面的github链接有一个自述，它给出了适当的解释。 https://github.com/sankar4git/volatile_thread_ordering

挥发性(vɒlətʌɪl):在常温下容易挥发

关于volatile的重要一点:

Synchronization in Java is possible by using Java keywords synchronized and volatile and locks. In Java, we can not have synchronized variable. Using synchronized keyword with a variable is illegal and will result in compilation error. Instead of using the synchronized variable in Java, you can use the java volatile variable, which will instruct JVM threads to read the value of volatile variable from main memory and don’t cache it locally. If a variable is not shared between multiple threads then there is no need to use the volatile keyword.

源

volatile用法示例:

public class Singleton {
    private static volatile Singleton _instance; // volatile variable
    public static Singleton getInstance() {
        if (_instance == null) {
            synchronized (Singleton.class) {
                if (_instance == null)
                    _instance = new Singleton();
            }
        }
        return _instance;
    }
}

我们在第一个请求到来时惰性地创建实例。

如果我们不使_instance变量为volatile，那么创建Singleton实例的线程就不能与其他线程通信。因此，如果线程A正在创建单例实例，在创建后，CPU损坏等，所有其他线程将无法看到_instance的值不为空，他们将认为它仍然被分配为空。

为什么会发生这种情况?因为读线程不做任何锁，直到写线程从同步块中出来，内存不会被同步，_instance的值也不会在主存中更新。使用Java中的Volatile关键字，这是由Java本身处理的，这样的更新将对所有读取线程可见。

结论:volatile关键字也用于线程之间的内存内容通信。

without volatile的用法示例:

public class Singleton {    
    private static Singleton _instance;   //without volatile variable
    public static Singleton getInstance() {   
        if (_instance == null) {  
            synchronized(Singleton.class) {  
                if (_instance == null) 
                    _instance = new Singleton(); 
            } 
        }
        return _instance;  
    }
}

The code above is not thread-safe. Although it checks the value of instance once again within the synchronized block (for performance reasons), the JIT compiler can rearrange the bytecode in a way that the reference to the instance is set before the constructor has finished its execution. This means the method getInstance() returns an object that may not have been initialized completely. To make the code thread-safe, the keyword volatile can be used since Java 5 for the instance variable. Variables that are marked as volatile get only visible to other threads once the constructor of the object has finished its execution completely. Source

Java中不稳定的用法:

快速失败迭代器通常使用list对象上的volatile计数器实现。

当列表更新时，计数器会递增。 创建Iterator时，计数器的当前值嵌入到Iterator对象中。 当执行Iterator操作时，该方法比较两个计数器值，如果不相同则抛出ConcurrentModificationException异常。

故障安全迭代器的实现通常是轻量级的。它们通常依赖于特定列表实现的数据结构的属性。没有一般的模式。

是的，我经常使用它——它对多线程代码非常有用。你指的那篇文章很好。不过有两件重要的事情要记住:

You should only use volatile if you completely understand what it does and how it differs to synchronized. In many situations volatile appears, on the surface, to be a simpler more performant alternative to synchronized, when often a better understanding of volatile would make clear that synchronized is the only option that would work. volatile doesn't actually work in a lot of older JVMs, although synchronized does. I remember seeing a document that referenced the various levels of support in different JVMs but unfortunately I can't find it now. Definitely look into it if you're using Java pre 1.5 or if you don't have control over the JVMs that your program will be running on.

Volatile只保证所有线程，甚至线程本身，都是递增的。例如:计数器在同一时间看到变量的同一面。它不是用来代替同步或原子或其他东西，它完全使读取同步。请不要将其与其他java关键字进行比较。如下例所示，volatile变量操作也是原子性的，它们会立即失败或成功。

package io.netty.example.telnet;

import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.List;

public class Main {

    public static volatile  int a = 0;
    public static void main(String args[]) throws InterruptedException{

        List<Thread> list = new  ArrayList<Thread>();
        for(int i = 0 ; i<11 ;i++){
            list.add(new Pojo());
        }

        for (Thread thread : list) {
            thread.start();
        }

        Thread.sleep(20000);
        System.out.println(a);
    }
}
class Pojo extends Thread{
    int a = 10001;
    public void run() {
        while(a-->0){
            try {
                Thread.sleep(1);
            } catch (InterruptedException e) {
                e.printStackTrace();
            }
            Main.a++;
            System.out.println("a = "+Main.a);
        }
    }
}

即使你放不放，结果也总会不一样。但是，如果您像下面那样使用AtomicInteger，结果将始终相同。同步也是如此。

    package io.netty.example.telnet;

    import java.util.ArrayList;
    import java.util.List;
    import java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicInteger;

    public class Main {

        public static volatile  AtomicInteger a = new AtomicInteger(0);
        public static void main(String args[]) throws InterruptedException{

            List<Thread> list = new  ArrayList<Thread>();
            for(int i = 0 ; i<11 ;i++){
                list.add(new Pojo());
            }

            for (Thread thread : list) {
                thread.start();
            }

            Thread.sleep(20000);
            System.out.println(a.get());

        }
    }
    class Pojo extends Thread{
        int a = 10001;
        public void run() {
            while(a-->0){
                try {
                    Thread.sleep(1);
                } catch (InterruptedException e) {
                    e.printStackTrace();
                }
                Main.a.incrementAndGet();
                System.out.println("a = "+Main.a);
            }
        }
    }

如果您正在开发多线程应用程序，您将需要使用'volatile'关键字或'synchronized'以及您可能拥有的任何其他并发控制工具和技术。桌面应用就是这样一个例子。

If you are developing an application that would be deployed to application server (Tomcat, JBoss AS, Glassfish, etc) you don't have to handle concurrency control yourself as it already addressed by the application server. In fact, if I remembered correctly the Java EE standard prohibit any concurrency control in servlets and EJBs, since it is part of the 'infrastructure' layer which you supposed to be freed from handling it. You only do concurrency control in such app if you're implementing singleton objects. This even already addressed if you knit your components using frameworkd like Spring.

因此，在Java开发的大多数情况下，应用程序是一个web应用程序，并使用IoC框架，如Spring或EJB，你不需要使用'volatile'。

…volatile修饰符保证任何读取字段的线程都能看到最近写入的值。——乔希·布洛赫 如果您正在考虑使用volatile，请仔细阅读java.util.concurrent包，它处理原子行为。 维基百科上关于单例模式的帖子显示了volatile的使用。