如何向某人解释JavaScript关闭,知道它们所构成的概念(例如功能、变量等),但不了解关闭本身?

我已经在维基百科上看到了图表的例子,但不幸的是,它没有帮助。


当前回答

也许我们应该切断你的27岁的朋友,因为整个“关闭”的概念是(!)...... voodoo!

我意思的是:(a)你不直觉地期望它......(b)当有人花时间向你解释它时,你肯定不会期望它工作!

当你终于意识到这样的事情是可能的,那么......肯定......任何人的后事实反应会是:“whoa-a-a(!)...... kew-el-l-l...(!!!)”

直觉给了你很多完全可靠的期望,这样的事情会“当然,绝对是无意义的,因此是完全不可能的。

正如我所说的那样,“这就是伏地。

其他回答

JavaScript 功能可以访问:

论点本地(即其本地变量和本地功能) 环境,其中包括:全球性,包括DOM在外部功能中的任何东西

请注意,外部功能不需要,尽管它们提供的好处我不在这里讨论。 通过访问其环境中的数据,一个关闭保持数据的生存. 在外部/内部功能的底部,外部功能可以创建本地数据,最终输出,但是,如果任何内部功能(s)在外部功能输出后生存,那么内部功能(s)保持外部功能的位置。

使用全球环境的封闭例子:

当用户点击 VoteUp 按钮时, voteUp_click 函数检查是否是VotedDown == 真实,以确定是否投票或仅仅取消投票。

var isVotedUp = false;
var isVotedDown = false;

function voteUp_click() {
  if (isVotedUp)
    return;
  else if (isVotedDown)
    SetDownVote(false);
  else
    SetUpVote(true);
}

function voteDown_click() {
  if (isVotedDown)
    return;
  else if (isVotedUp)
    SetUpVote(false);
  else
    SetDownVote(true);
}

function SetUpVote(status) {
  isVotedUp = status;
  // Do some CSS stuff to Vote-Up button
}

function SetDownVote(status) {
  isVotedDown = status;
  // Do some CSS stuff to Vote-Down button
}

关闭是当内部函数以某种方式为外部函数以外的任何范围提供时创建的。

例子:

var outer = function(params){ //Outer function defines a variable called params
    var inner = function(){ // Inner function has access to the params variable of the outer function
        return params;
    }
    return inner; //Return inner function exposing it to outer scope
},
myFunc = outer("myParams");
myFunc(); //Returns "myParams"

因为所有这些外部变量,由一个经文所指的函数,实际上是其经文所关闭的函数链中的本地变量(全球变量可以假设是某种根函数的本地变量),并且每个函数的单一执行都会产生其本地变量的新例子,因此,每个函数的执行都会返回(或以其他方式转换)。

此外,必须明白,JavaScript中的本地变量不是在滑板框中创建的,而是在滑板上,只有当没有人提到它们时才会被摧毁。当一个函数返回时,其本地变量的参考会减少,但如果在当前执行期间,它们成为关闭的一部分,并且仍然被其经文所定义的函数所提到。

一个例子:

function foo (initValue) {
   //This variable is not destroyed when the foo function exits.
   //It is 'captured' by the two nested functions returned below.
   var value = initValue;

   //Note that the two returned functions are created right now.
   //If the foo function is called again, it will return
   //new functions referencing a different 'value' variable.
   return {
       getValue: function () { return value; },
       setValue: function (newValue) { value = newValue; }
   }
}

function bar () {
    //foo sets its local variable 'value' to 5 and returns an object with
    //two functions still referencing that local variable
    var obj = foo(5);

    //Extracting functions just to show that no 'this' is involved here
    var getValue = obj.getValue;
    var setValue = obj.setValue;

    alert(getValue()); //Displays 5
    setValue(10);
    alert(getValue()); //Displays 10

    //At this point getValue and setValue functions are destroyed
    //(in reality they are destroyed at the next iteration of the garbage collector).
    //The local variable 'value' in the foo is no longer referenced by
    //anything and is destroyed too.
}

bar();

第一個問題有一個引用:

如果你不能向六岁的人解释,你真的不明白。

这就是我会试图向一个真正的六岁男孩解释的方式:

你知道成年人如何拥有房子,他们称之为房子吗?当一个母亲有孩子时,孩子真的没有任何东西,对吗?但是她的父母拥有房子,所以每当有人问“你的房子在哪里?”孩子可以回答“那房子!”并指向父母的房子。

“关闭”是孩子能够永远(即使在国外)提到自己的家,即使是真正的父母拥有家。

好吧,和一个6岁的孩子谈话,我可能会使用随后的协会。

想象一下 - 你正在玩你的小兄弟姐妹在整个房子,你正在移动周围与你的玩具,并将其中的一些带到你的哥哥的房间。 过了一会儿,你的哥哥从学校回来,去了他的房间,他锁在里面,所以现在你不能访问玩具留在那里再直接的方式。

比较一个情况,当一个门被草案锁定,没有人在里面(通用功能执行),然后一些当地的火灾发生并燃烧房间(垃圾收集器:D),然后一个新的房间被建造,现在你可以留下其他玩具在那里(新功能例子),但从来没有得到相同的玩具留在第一间房间例子。

对于一个先进的孩子,我会把这样的东西放在下面,这不是完美的,但它让你感觉到它是什么:

function playingInBrothersRoom (withToys) {
  // We closure toys which we played in the brother's room. When he come back and lock the door
  // your brother is supposed to be into the outer [[scope]] object now. Thanks god you could communicate with him.
  var closureToys = withToys || [],
      returnToy, countIt, toy; // Just another closure helpers, for brother's inner use.

  var brotherGivesToyBack = function (toy) {
    // New request. There is not yet closureToys on brother's hand yet. Give him a time.
    returnToy = null;
    if (toy && closureToys.length > 0) { // If we ask for a specific toy, the brother is going to search for it.

      for ( countIt = closureToys.length; countIt; countIt--) {
        if (closureToys[countIt - 1] == toy) {
          returnToy = 'Take your ' + closureToys.splice(countIt - 1, 1) + ', little boy!';
          break;
        }
      }
      returnToy = returnToy || 'Hey, I could not find any ' + toy + ' here. Look for it in another room.';
    }
    else if (closureToys.length > 0) { // Otherwise, just give back everything he has in the room.
      returnToy = 'Behold! ' + closureToys.join(', ') + '.';
      closureToys = [];
    }
    else {
      returnToy = 'Hey, lil shrimp, I gave you everything!';
    }
    console.log(returnToy);
  }
  return brotherGivesToyBack;
}
// You are playing in the house, including the brother's room.
var toys = ['teddybear', 'car', 'jumpingrope'],
    askBrotherForClosuredToy = playingInBrothersRoom(toys);

// The door is locked, and the brother came from the school. You could not cheat and take it out directly.
console.log(askBrotherForClosuredToy.closureToys); // Undefined

// But you could ask your brother politely, to give it back.
askBrotherForClosuredToy('teddybear'); // Hooray, here it is, teddybear
askBrotherForClosuredToy('ball'); // The brother would not be able to find it.
askBrotherForClosuredToy(); // The brother gives you all the rest
askBrotherForClosuredToy(); // Nothing left in there

正如你可以看到的那样,房间里留下的玩具仍然可以通过兄弟访问,不管房间是否被锁定。