404 Not Found在技术上意味着uri当前没有映射到某个资源。在您的示例中，我解释了对http://mywebsite/api/user/13的请求，该请求返回404，以暗示此url从未映射到资源。对于客户来说，这应该是谈话的结束。

To address concerns with ambiguity, you can enhance your API by providing other response codes. For example, suppose you want to allow clients to issue GET requests the url http://mywebsite/api/user/13, you want to communicate that clients should use the canonical url http://mywebsite/restapi/user/13. In that case, you may want to consider issuing a permanent redirect by returning a 301 Moved Permanently and supply the canonical url in the Location header of the response. This tells the client that for future requests they should use the canonical url.

统一资源标识符是指向资源的唯一指针。格式较差的URI不指向资源，因此对其执行GET操作将不会返回资源。404表示服务器没有找到任何与请求uri匹配的内容。如果你输入了错误的URI或坏的URI，这就是你的问题，也是你无法访问资源的原因，无论是HTML页面还是IMG。

所以从本质上讲，听起来答案可能取决于请求是如何形成的。

如果根据对http://mywebsite/restapi/user/13的请求，所请求的资源构成URI的一部分，而用户13不存在，那么404可能是合适的和直观的，因为URI代表不存在的用户/实体/文档等。对于使用GUID http://mywebsite/api/user/3dd5b770-79ea-11e1-b0c4-0800200c9a66和上面的api/restapi参数的更安全的技术，情况也是如此。

However, if the requested resource ID was included in the request header [include your own example], or indeed, in the URI as a parameter, eg http://mywebsite/restapi/user/?UID=13 then the URI would still be correct (because the concept of a USER does exits at http://mywebsite/restapi/user/); and therefore the response could reasonable be expected to be a 200 (with an appropriately verbose message) because the specific user known as 13 does not exist but the URI does. This way we are saying the URI is good, but the request for data has no content.

就我个人而言，200还是感觉不对(尽管我之前也说过)。例如，当发送不正确的ID时，200响应代码(没有详细响应)可能导致不调查问题。

A better approach would be to send a 204 - No Contentresponse. This is compliant with w3c's description *The server has fulfilled the request but does not need to return an entity-body, and might want to return updated metainformation.*1 The confusion, in my opinion is caused by the Wikipedia entry stating 204 No Content - The server successfully processed the request, but is not returning any content. Usually used as a response to a successful delete request. The last sentence is highly debateable. Consider the situation without that sentence and the solution is easy - just send a 204 if the entity does not exist. There is even an argument for returning a 204 instead of a 404, the request has been processed and no content has been returned! Please be aware though, 204's do not allow content in the response body

来源

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_HTTP_status_codes 1. http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec10.html

由于这个讨论似乎能够在时间结束时幸存下来，我将抛出JSON:API规范

404未找到 服务器在处理获取不存在的单个资源的请求时必须响应404 Not Found，除非请求保证200 OK响应并以null作为主要数据(如上所述)。

HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Content-Type: application/vnd.api+json

{
  "links": {
    "self": "http://example.com/articles/1/author"
  },
  "data": null
}

也请看看这个Stackoverflow问题

404 Not Found在技术上意味着uri当前没有映射到某个资源。在您的示例中，我解释了对http://mywebsite/api/user/13的请求，该请求返回404，以暗示此url从未映射到资源。对于客户来说，这应该是谈话的结束。

To address concerns with ambiguity, you can enhance your API by providing other response codes. For example, suppose you want to allow clients to issue GET requests the url http://mywebsite/api/user/13, you want to communicate that clients should use the canonical url http://mywebsite/restapi/user/13. In that case, you may want to consider issuing a permanent redirect by returning a 301 Moved Permanently and supply the canonical url in the Location header of the response. This tells the client that for future requests they should use the canonical url.

这篇古老但优秀的文章……http://www.infoq.com/articles/webber-rest-workflow是这么说的…

404 Not Found——服务太懒惰(或者太安全)了，不能给我们一个请求失败的真实原因，但是不管是什么原因，我们都需要处理它。