只查找重复的值:

var duplicates = list.GroupBy(x => x.Key).Where(g => g.Count() > 1);

E.g.

var list = new[] {1,2,3,1,4,2};

GroupBy将根据它们的键对数字进行分组，并使用它维护计数(重复的次数)。在那之后，我们只是检查重复了不止一次的值。

要查找唯一的值:

var unique = list.GroupBy(x => x.Key).Where(g => g.Count() == 1);

E.g.

var list = new[] {1,2,3,1,4,2};

GroupBy将根据它们的键对数字进行分组，并使用它维护计数(重复的次数)。在此之后，我们只是检查那些只重复一次的值是否惟一。

我创建了一个扩展来响应这个，你可以把它包括在你的项目中，我认为这返回的大多数情况下，当你在列表或Linq中搜索重复。

例子:

//Dummy class to compare in list
public class Person
{
    public int Id { get; set; }
    public string Name { get; set; }
    public string Surname { get; set; }
    public Person(int id, string name, string surname)
    {
        this.Id = id;
        this.Name = name;
        this.Surname = surname;
    }
}


//The extention static class
public static class Extention
{
    public static IEnumerable<T> getMoreThanOnceRepeated<T>(this IEnumerable<T> extList, Func<T, object> groupProps) where T : class
    { //Return only the second and next reptition
        return extList
            .GroupBy(groupProps)
            .SelectMany(z => z.Skip(1)); //Skip the first occur and return all the others that repeats
    }
    public static IEnumerable<T> getAllRepeated<T>(this IEnumerable<T> extList, Func<T, object> groupProps) where T : class
    {
        //Get All the lines that has repeating
        return extList
            .GroupBy(groupProps)
            .Where(z => z.Count() > 1) //Filter only the distinct one
            .SelectMany(z => z);//All in where has to be retuned
    }
}

//how to use it:
void DuplicateExample()
{
    //Populate List
    List<Person> PersonsLst = new List<Person>(){
    new Person(1,"Ricardo","Figueiredo"), //fist Duplicate to the example
    new Person(2,"Ana","Figueiredo"),
    new Person(3,"Ricardo","Figueiredo"),//second Duplicate to the example
    new Person(4,"Margarida","Figueiredo"),
    new Person(5,"Ricardo","Figueiredo")//third Duplicate to the example
    };

    Console.WriteLine("All:");
    PersonsLst.ForEach(z => Console.WriteLine("{0} -> {1} {2}", z.Id, z.Name, z.Surname));
    /* OUTPUT:
        All:
        1 -> Ricardo Figueiredo
        2 -> Ana Figueiredo
        3 -> Ricardo Figueiredo
        4 -> Margarida Figueiredo
        5 -> Ricardo Figueiredo
        */

    Console.WriteLine("All lines with repeated data");
    PersonsLst.getAllRepeated(z => new { z.Name, z.Surname })
        .ToList()
        .ForEach(z => Console.WriteLine("{0} -> {1} {2}", z.Id, z.Name, z.Surname));
    /* OUTPUT:
        All lines with repeated data
        1 -> Ricardo Figueiredo
        3 -> Ricardo Figueiredo
        5 -> Ricardo Figueiredo
        */
    Console.WriteLine("Only Repeated more than once");
    PersonsLst.getMoreThanOnceRepeated(z => new { z.Name, z.Surname })
        .ToList()
        .ForEach(z => Console.WriteLine("{0} -> {1} {2}", z.Id, z.Name, z.Surname));
    /* OUTPUT:
        Only Repeated more than once
        3 -> Ricardo Figueiredo
        5 -> Ricardo Figueiredo
        */
}

只查找重复的值:

var duplicates = list.GroupBy(x => x.Key).Where(g => g.Count() > 1);

E.g.

var list = new[] {1,2,3,1,4,2};

GroupBy将根据它们的键对数字进行分组，并使用它维护计数(重复的次数)。在那之后，我们只是检查重复了不止一次的值。

要查找唯一的值:

var unique = list.GroupBy(x => x.Key).Where(g => g.Count() == 1);

E.g.

var list = new[] {1,2,3,1,4,2};

GroupBy将根据它们的键对数字进行分组，并使用它维护计数(重复的次数)。在此之后，我们只是检查那些只重复一次的值是否惟一。

所有的GroupBy答案都是最简单的，但不是最有效的。它们对内存性能尤其不利，因为构建大型内部集合需要分配成本。

一个不错的替代方案是HuBeZa的HashSet。基于添加的方法。它表现得更好。

如果你不关心空值，就我所知，像这样的东西是最有效的(CPU和内存):

public static IEnumerable<TProperty> Duplicates<TSource, TProperty>(
    this IEnumerable<TSource> source,
    Func<TSource, TProperty> duplicateSelector,
    IEqualityComparer<TProperty> comparer = null)
{
    comparer ??= EqualityComparer<TProperty>.Default;

    Dictionary<TProperty, int> counts = new Dictionary<TProperty, int>(comparer);

    foreach (var item in source)
    {
        TProperty property = duplicateSelector(item);
        counts.TryGetValue(property, out int count);

        switch (count)
        {
            case 0:
                counts[property] = ++count;
                break;

            case 1:
                counts[property] = ++count;
                yield return property;
                break;
        }
    }
}

这里的技巧是在重复数达到1时避免额外的查找成本。当然，如果您还想知道每个项重复出现的次数，则可以使用count不断更新字典。对于null，你只需要一些额外的处理，仅此而已。

按键删除重复项

myTupleList = myTupleList.GroupBy(tuple => tuple.Item1).Select(group => group.First()).ToList();

这种更简单的方法，不使用组，只是获得区域元素，然后迭代它们，并检查它们在列表中的计数，如果它们的计数是>1，这意味着它出现超过1项，所以将其添加到Repeteditemlist

var mylist = new List<int>() { 1, 1, 2, 3, 3, 3, 4, 4, 4 };
            var distList=  mylist.Distinct().ToList();
            var Repeteditemlist = new List<int>();
            foreach (var item in distList)
            {
               if(mylist.Count(e => e == item) > 1)
                {
                    Repeteditemlist.Add(item);
                }
            }
            foreach (var item in Repeteditemlist)
            {
                Console.WriteLine(item);
            }

预期的输出:

1 3 4