你遇到过的源代码中最好的注释是什么?


当前回答

public function get state( /* of Palestine back */ ):Boolean

其他回答

#!/usr/bin/sh
#       Copyright (c) 1984, 1986, 1987, 1988, 1989 AT&T
#         All Rights Reserved

#       THIS IS UNPUBLISHED PROPRIETARY SOURCE CODE OF AT&T
#       The copyright notice above does not evidence any
#       actual or intended publication of such source code.

#ident  "@(#)false.sh   1.6     93/01/11 SMI"   /* SVr4.0 1.3   */
exit 255

从SunOS 5.9即Solaris 9获取(/usr/bin/false)

写得很好的Lisp是最容易阅读的语言之一,我喜欢它。但是写得不好的Lisp可能是比糟糕的Java更糟糕的噩梦,等等。

在这里,我们需要创建一个“组文件”,如果一个原始文件有3个变体,后缀为a, b和c。我一直试图追踪一个奇怪的错误,我们得到了不必要的组文件……

  (let ((varianta (format nil "~aa" problem))
        (variantb (format nil "~ab" problem))
        (variantc (format nil "~ac" problem)))
    ;;if the A and B variants exist, create a group file
    ;;(why not just check for a? I don't know, this just feels right)
    (when (and (probe-file varianta)
               (probe-file variantb))
      ...)))

Bug: 1, Gut: 0。

显然,写这篇文章的人没有想到,也许检查所有三种变体是一个好主意。当然,这是我在最初编写这段代码十年之后(它比第一个SVN日志更早)最终追踪到的错误。

我前几天刚检查过这个…

/// <STERNLY-WORDED-WARNING>
/// Pay attention to this or I will hunt you down.
/// ...
/// </STERNLY-WORDED-WARNING>

(“……”== "专有的东西,我不能发布")。我只是喜欢我的措辞严厉的警告元素。

在一个著名的商业DOS电子表格应用程序中:

/* This comment was just added in order to check-in a file that was last 
checked in by [Insert Programmer FirstName] "Back-to-the-Future" [Insert 
Programmer LastName]. While testing for year 2000 problems, he accidentally 
checked-in this file while his machine clock was set forward to the year 2000. 
This meant that the source code was always newer than the object file and 
compiled every time the code was built. I'm checking this file in again to 
fix that. */

我最喜欢的是已故的Paul DiLascia:

//作者:如果这段代码工作,它是由Paul DiLascia写的。如果不是,我就不知道是谁写的了。