你遇到过的源代码中最好的注释是什么?


当前回答

//
//3.4  JeK  My manager promised me a lap dance if I can fix this release
//3.5  JeK  Still waiting for that dance from my manager
//3.6  JeK  My manager got changed, the new manager is hairy, dont want the dance anymore
//3.7  Jek  Got that dance, yuck!
//

其他回答

我曾经在一个用Paradox 3.5 -编写的大型预算系统工作多年后接到一个客户的电话

“我们在调试中遇到了一些注释”-

// This shouldn't happen, if it does, then the bits that automagically 
// worked when I wrote it have stopped working

... !

我曾经参与过Windows 3.0的源代码。(我赶紧补充一句,作为一名微软员工,不是!)在那里,我遇到了一个文件加载器,它可以多次重新输入,并且有一个讨厌的双关语的例子(只是为了显示作者有多聪明)。

这些乱七八糟的可重入代码是用Intel程序集jmp指令(在C代码中间)执行的,它的标签是“we_are_not_in_kansas_any_more_toto”。

一些源代码中的德语注释,由机器或非常疲惫的人翻译+谷歌

; Rechnen ja ; have faith in yes

我猜原来的意思是“假设这里是真的”…但从那以后,我就把它当成了人生的咒语。

//ALL YOUR BASE ARE BELONG TO US

...这让我的老板以为有人黑进了系统。他不知道这个笑话。

Many years ago (about 1994) I was working on a Oracle PRO*C application for a large multi-national software company that you will have heard of. The app I was working on was a massive Oracle application and they had a utility that ran overnight tidying up data and doing all sorts of aggregate calculations. Every time anything needed doing as a batch job, it got shoved into this utility and as you can imagine it became an absolute monstrosity. It was also notable for the tiny number of comments that it had for such a massive program.

它为数不多的评论之一仍然是我所见过的对纯粹的WTF的最好的评论……我试图在一个函数中找到一个bug,它有数百行长,中间是函数中唯一的注释:

/* I did this the other way */

直到今天,这仍然是我所见过的最好的评论。