我最喜欢的评论是:

//the XML returned from this request is *mind-bogglingly* bad. Terrifyingly bad.
//a completed batch looks like this:
//<Batch>batchid=363777811 status=Done dateandtime=09/18/2007 09:53:10 PDT activateditems=335 numberofwarnings=0 itemsnotacivated=17 </Batch>
//and an incomplete batch like:
//<Batch>batchid=363778361 status=In Progress </Batch>
//so we'll just parse each item as a regex. Thanks Amazon.

Amazon实际上是这样返回XML的。

// This condition can't happen. Call the police or something.

在LKM中:

/*
* Dear Richard Stallman,
*
* This one's for you.
*
* Sincerely,
* Me
*
*/
MODULE_LICENSE( "GPL" );

在一组相当长且复杂的while循环和if块的末尾，开发人员插入了最后的注释:

else
{
    // wobbly wilson said this would *never* happen!!
}

机智和讽刺的简洁混合:)

-- Change Log:  Not needed. The code is perfect 'cause I wrote it.
-- If you change it, it will break.

我正在检查一些代码注释，以检查它们是否有意义，并看到上面的一行。

// Added because boss changed his mind : 20020111,20020501,20020820, ...
// Commented out because boss changed his mind : 20020201,20020614,20020908, ...

在ETL脚本之间的主要黑客RPG数据库和SQL Server一个。我大概有10到20次这样的评论……