你遇到过的源代码中最好的注释是什么?


当前回答

'this next if statement - just how it is. don't try to understand it because you won't. :)

这就是工作保障。

其他回答

我经历了一个睡眠不足的编程过程,开始只写引用自《搏击俱乐部》的评论。

多年后,我仍然在浏览代码,发现了一条让我发笑的评论。大多数只是随机的想法。然而,我确实保持我的评论行比率相当好!

// This shouldn't happen. The only way this can happen is if the
// <code>JFileChooser</code> has returned a <code>File</code> that doesn't exist
// on the system. If this happens we can't recover, and there is more than likely
// a rip in the space time continuum that the user is too distracted by to notice
// anything else.

 /**
   * This method leverages collective synergy to drive "outside of the box"
   * thinking and formulate key objectives into a win-win game plan with a
   * quality-driven approach that focuses on empowering key players to drive-up
   * their core competencies and increase expectations with an all-around
   * initiative to drive down the bottom-line. I really wanted to work the word
   * "mandrolic" in there, but that word always makes me want to punch myself in
   * the face.
   */
private void updateFileCountLabel() {

我猜它被病毒式传播了,我在一个守护进程(Linux)中发现了以下防止OOM杀手选择它:

/*
 * Don't OOM me, bro!
 */

这紧跟在mlockall()之后,以防止进程交换,注释如下:

/*
 * Don't swap me, bro!
 */
struct core_unlocker
{
    core_unlocker(lock)
    {
        m_lock = lock
        unlock(lock)  //Abandon All Locks, Ye Who Enter Core!
    }
    ~core_unlocker()
    {
        lock(m_lock)
    }  
    private:
    Corelock m_lock;
}
//When I wrote this, only God and I understood what I was doing
//Now, God only knows

我想我有过这样的经历:


if (case1) { // trivial
...
}
else { // we are screwed
 /* fill in later */
}

好吧,我可能用了一个比搞砸更强烈的词