你遇到过的源代码中最好的注释是什么?


当前回答

我刚刚完成了一个日志框架(使用Trace,为什么没有这样的存在我不知道)。我做了一个继承自TraceListener的方便基类。它覆盖了所有的TraceListener方法,并将它们路由到一个方法中——因此有很多文档注释:

// TODO: Need some codemonkey to doc comment this class.

其他回答

#!/usr/bin/sh
#       Copyright (c) 1984, 1986, 1987, 1988, 1989 AT&T
#         All Rights Reserved

#       THIS IS UNPUBLISHED PROPRIETARY SOURCE CODE OF AT&T
#       The copyright notice above does not evidence any
#       actual or intended publication of such source code.

#ident  "@(#)false.sh   1.6     93/01/11 SMI"   /* SVr4.0 1.3   */
exit 255

从SunOS 5.9即Solaris 9获取(/usr/bin/false)

消毒:

//Forward declarations:

class X {}; // TODO: Remove {}  ! When we get X defined....

不是代码注释,而是SVN在同一个文件上提交注释:

第一次提交(在测试人员返回结果后,再进行数十次提交):

Squashed some IPR mod bugs. The were big and juicy ones, too.

2日提交:

Squashed some more mod bugs. Those are some nasty bugs, them mod bugs...

3rd:

Squashed some more mod bugs. They are like cockroaches: they'll live through a nuclear war.

4th:

Squashed some more John bugs. They too are like cockroaches: they appear anywhere John goes. Wait. That doesn't sound right.

5:

Same John bug. It didn't die, just played 'possum.

是的,我厌倦了"修复bug"

这个我在Python 2.5的“twisted”包中找到的(文件是tcp.py在第371行)

# Limit length of buffer to try to send, because some OSes are too
# stupid to do so themselves (ahem windows)
return self.socket.send(buffer(data, 0, self.SEND_LIMIT))

javascript函数的第一行:

// this part is more difficult

WTF?