我们有一个文件，在它的一半，一个程序员试图弄清楚混乱的意义，设法将所有无意义的代码移到底部，并留下了这样的评论:

I have no idea what this stuff does below here.

另一名程序员留下了一系列嵌套的命名空间，这些命名空间的作用类似于“方向手册”，这样您就可以钻取想法中的名称空间并选择您的操作。

//Abandon all hope ye who enter beyond this point

我们有一个小组项目，使用最小-最大树创建一个Connect 4 AI。在我们的move-scoring函数中，我们让它为棋盘计算分数，在这段代码之上有这样的注释:

// This is kind of almost useless

但还有更好的。我们的导师给了我们一些他制作的粗糙AI的示例代码，并留下了很好的评论:

// We also add/subtract some points based on what's going on, on the bottom
// row. (I think this is retarded, but apparently when I coded this up 
// back in 1999 I didn't.)

在linux 1.0内核调度器(schedule .c)中:

Dijkstra可能讨厌我。

/*
 *  'schedule()' is the scheduler function. It's a very simple and nice
 * scheduler: it's not perfect, but certainly works for most things.
 * The one thing you might take a look at is the signal-handler code here.
 *
 *   NOTE!!  Task 0 is the 'idle' task, which gets called when no other
 * tasks can run. It can not be killed, and it cannot sleep. The 'state'
 * information in task[0] is never used.
 *
 * The "confuse_gcc" goto is used only to get better assembly code..
 * Dijkstra probably hates me.
 */
asmlinkage void schedule(void)

(…)

/// <summary>
/// The possible outcomes of an update operation (save or delete)
/// </summary>
public enum UpdateResult
{

    /// <summary>
    /// Updated successfully
    /// </summary>
    Success = 0,

    /// <summary>
    /// Updated successfully
    /// </summary>
    Failed = 1
}

// TODO - Comment this function