你遇到过的源代码中最好的注释是什么?


当前回答

// Magic. Do not touch.

其他回答

#如你所见:我注释了代码!

' Oh man I'm pissed. I think I better go home.

哪里喝醉了

一个文件中5000多行代码中很少的一些注释 事实上,我和那个为自己的编码风格辩护的程序员有过一次争论…… 无可奉告! 没有评论;-)(或者很少) 遗憾的是,这是产品代码。

offset=1;
for (i=0;i<=len;i++)
    {
    if ((i!=0)&&(i<len)) //-3
        {
        switch(mess[i])
            {
            case ETX:
            case ETB:
            case DLE:
                buf[offset]=DLE;
                offset++;
                break;
            }
        }
    buf[offset]=mess[i];
    offset++;
    }

我喜欢这个开关!

for (n=0;n<offset;n++)
{
    Sleep(TR);  //Modif A
    Sleep(T);//
    FWriteFile(hCom,buf+n,1,&dwMot,NULL);
    if (ECHO)
        FReadFile(hCom,tab,1,&dwMot,NULL);
}

不,没有注释解释什么“修改A”是在标题。

if (GetFileSize(hSlotFile,NULL)==3600)   //5*720

720是多少?

/* This is O(scary), but seems quick enough in practice. */ 

后面是四个嵌套的for循环

对于我编写的memcache包装器/处理程序接口模式类,我实现了以下方法。

/**
*  Do not use, ever - left in place for testing purposes
*/
function  I_David_WillHuntYouDownAndHurtYou_Badly_IfIFindThisUsedAnyWhereInTheAppLibrary(){
...
}

这基本上是一个超级核函数,它告诉所有单独的memcache服务完全刷新自己,并从我用于键的单个名称空间计数器(例如{_counter_key value}_)重新开始。{_counter_key value})

Another minor novella I wrote was for an automated downloader for a data vendor, detailing how much I hated this vendor and went to great lengths of postulating that their infrastructure's batch system was run by a gerbil, running on a wheel and after so many revolutions of the wheel the next queued task would be started. It was written over the course of 6 months of adding additional exception handling, estoric checks like ( if we got 768 Bytes of \s characters, that means the query to their DB timed out and the spaces are the result of empty failure print statements.