你遇到过的源代码中最好的注释是什么?


当前回答

// Magic. Do not touch.

其他回答

从C #

#region Hack - Shield Eyes Before Expanding

/// <summary>
/// A single uint with all of the bits set to represent the different tracing
/// </summary>
/// <remarks>
/// Ugly I know, so if you can think of a better way, feel free to rewrite.
/// </remarks>
[Browsable(false)]
public uint TraceBitfield
{
    // Snip
}

#endregion

//说明:!!待办事项

对于我编写的memcache包装器/处理程序接口模式类,我实现了以下方法。

/**
*  Do not use, ever - left in place for testing purposes
*/
function  I_David_WillHuntYouDownAndHurtYou_Badly_IfIFindThisUsedAnyWhereInTheAppLibrary(){
...
}

这基本上是一个超级核函数,它告诉所有单独的memcache服务完全刷新自己,并从我用于键的单个名称空间计数器(例如{_counter_key value}_)重新开始。{_counter_key value})

Another minor novella I wrote was for an automated downloader for a data vendor, detailing how much I hated this vendor and went to great lengths of postulating that their infrastructure's batch system was run by a gerbil, running on a wheel and after so many revolutions of the wheel the next queued task would be started. It was written over the course of 6 months of adding additional exception handling, estoric checks like ( if we got 768 Bytes of \s characters, that means the query to their DB timed out and the spaces are the result of empty failure print statements.

我前几天刚检查过这个…

/// <STERNLY-WORDED-WARNING>
/// Pay attention to this or I will hunt you down.
/// ...
/// </STERNLY-WORDED-WARNING>

(“……”== "专有的东西,我不能发布")。我只是喜欢我的措辞严厉的警告元素。

我参与的一个大型项目在自动构建中使用了StyleCop和FXCop,并使用规则来防止人们检入带有未注释字段、方法、属性等的代码。

有些人对必须添加“获取或设置全名”之类的注释到自记录属性(如FullName)感到非常恼火,以至于他们不得不努力编写一个宏来绕过这些规则。

宏为方法、属性等插入了XML摘要标记,其中一个单一的不显示Unicode字符作为标记内容,这将欺骗构建规则,同时对为了注释而盲目坚持的东西进行轻微打击……

...至少直到他们引入了另一条规则来检查注释中的Unicode字符。