你遇到过的源代码中最好的注释是什么?


当前回答

不是代码注释,而是SVN在同一个文件上提交注释:

第一次提交(在测试人员返回结果后,再进行数十次提交):

Squashed some IPR mod bugs. The were big and juicy ones, too.

2日提交:

Squashed some more mod bugs. Those are some nasty bugs, them mod bugs...

3rd:

Squashed some more mod bugs. They are like cockroaches: they'll live through a nuclear war.

4th:

Squashed some more John bugs. They too are like cockroaches: they appear anywhere John goes. Wait. That doesn't sound right.

5:

Same John bug. It didn't die, just played 'possum.

是的,我厌倦了"修复bug"

其他回答

// this is really complicated

没有其他评论了

// John! If you'll svn remove this once more,
// I'll shut you, for God's sake!
// That piece of code is not “something strange”!
// That is THE AUTH VALIDATION.

你怎么看?下面的代码是安全的“svn删除”。

//把这个放在这里的人是个白痴…这根本不管用!

但是代码还在那里……

using namespace std;            // So sue me

在一个名为“Bar”的类中(这是一个不具有描述性名称的UI控件),类头文件:

/// <summary>I pity the "foo".</summary>

Remove()方法:

/// <summary>A "foo" and his money are soon parted.</summary>

更糟糕的是,业务合作伙伴从生成的文档中指出了这一点。更糟糕的是,这些可能是我们从那家伙那里得到的最接近有用文件的东西。