有一次，我在另一个讨论中看到这样的内容:

// I can't divide with zero, so I have to divide with something very similar
result = number / 0.00000000000001;

聪明的解决方案，不是吗?(如果有人不确定，这就是个笑话)

我经历了一个睡眠不足的编程过程，开始只写引用自《搏击俱乐部》的评论。

多年后，我仍然在浏览代码，发现了一条让我发笑的评论。大多数只是随机的想法。然而，我确实保持我的评论行比率相当好!

// This shouldn't happen. The only way this can happen is if the
// <code>JFileChooser</code> has returned a <code>File</code> that doesn't exist
// on the system. If this happens we can't recover, and there is more than likely
// a rip in the space time continuum that the user is too distracted by to notice
// anything else.

 /**
   * This method leverages collective synergy to drive "outside of the box"
   * thinking and formulate key objectives into a win-win game plan with a
   * quality-driven approach that focuses on empowering key players to drive-up
   * their core competencies and increase expectations with an all-around
   * initiative to drive down the bottom-line. I really wanted to work the word
   * "mandrolic" in there, but that word always makes me want to punch myself in
   * the face.
   */
private void updateFileCountLabel() {

一个可怕的解码补丁(意大利语翻译):

/**
*@return the value 
*@param key: the id of the list of instruments
*@PS this function is a violation of all the laws of the 
*software engineering, 
*commons sense, highway code 
*and ONU decision about the coding.
That sh*t...
*/

我喜欢GNU双utils中的一些注释。这个来自BFD som.c:

/* You'll never believe all this is necessary to handle relocations
   for function calls.  Having to compute and pack the argument
   relocation bits is the real nightmare.

   If you're interested in how this works, just forget it.  You really
   do not want to know about this braindamage.  */

这个也是:

/* Don't ask about these magic sequences.  I took them straight
   from gas-1.36 which took them from the a.out man page.  */

...

/* Keep track of exactly where we are within a particular
   space.  This is necessary as the braindamaged HPUX
   loader will create holes between subspaces *and*
   subspace alignments are *NOT* preserved.  What a crock.  */

另一个:

/* We will NOT put a fucking timestamp in the header here. Every
   time you put it back, I will come in and take it out again. ... */

从气体:

/* Yes this is ugly (storing the broken_word pointer
   in the symbol slot).  Still, this whole chunk of
   code is ugly, and I don't feel like doing anything
   about it.  Think of it as stubbornness in action.  */

曾经有一个为我工作的程序员在他的代码中加入了“Style”注释，他在代码中编写了关于特定实现细节的内部争论，当他在某个特定的编码决策上被否决时，他就会离开。

例子:

的风格 '这是有争议的，但我传递图像句柄，而不是简单地 '传递缩放值，以保持调用代码更简单(通过a '一对声明语句)。或者，我可以传递这些数据 成员，但这将违反封装。

的风格 就像我在其他地方做过的一样，我将正式提出抗议 的表格)，将注释序列化的实现视为 '一个属性，而不是一对Load/Save方法。这可能是 “风格的问题，值得商榷。

我曾经参与过Windows 3.0的源代码。(我赶紧补充一句，作为一名微软员工，不是!)在那里，我遇到了一个文件加载器，它可以多次重新输入，并且有一个讨厌的双关语的例子(只是为了显示作者有多聪明)。

这些乱七八糟的可重入代码是用Intel程序集jmp指令(在C代码中间)执行的，它的标签是“we_are_not_in_kansas_any_more_toto”。