The principal problem is that you have to get an specific behavior when you start an activity from background. If you override your onPause() and onResume() methods, you'll have a close answer, but not the solution. The problem is that onPause() and onResume() methods are called even if you don't minimize your application, they can be called when you start an activity and later you press the back button to return to your activity. To eliminate that problem and to know really when your application comes from background, you must to get the running process and compare with your process:

private boolean isApplicationBroughtToBackground() {
    ActivityManager am = (ActivityManager) getSystemService(Context.ACTIVITY_SERVICE);
    List<RunningTaskInfo> tasks = am.getRunningTasks(1);
    if (!tasks.isEmpty()) {
        ComponentName topActivity = tasks.get(0).topActivity;
        if (!topActivity.getPackageName().equals(getPackageName())) {
            return true;
        }
    }
    return false;
}

现在你必须声明一个布尔变量:

public boolean wasPaused = false;

并询问你的活动何时进入后台:

@Override
public void onPause(){
    super.onPause();
    if(isApplicationBroughtToBackground())
        wasPaused = true;
}

现在，当你的活动再次出现在屏幕上时，在onResume()方法中询问:

@Override
public void onResume(){
    super.onResume();
    if(wasPaused){
        lockScreen(true);
    }
    wasPaused = false;
}

就是这样。现在，当您的活动进入后台，稍后用户将其带到前台时，锁定屏幕将出现。

如果你想为你的应用程序的任何活动重复这个行为，你必须创建一个活动(可以是BaseActivity)，放这个方法，你所有的活动都必须从BaseActivity继承。

我希望这对你有帮助。

问候!

考虑使用onUserLeaveHint。它只会在应用进入后台时被调用。onPause会有一些极端情况需要处理，因为它可以被用于其他原因;例如，如果用户在你的应用程序中打开另一个活动，比如你的设置页面，你的主活动的onPause方法将被调用，即使它们仍然在你的应用程序中;当你可以简单地使用onUserLeaveHint回调函数来做你所要求的事情时，跟踪正在进行的事情将导致错误。

当调用on UserLeaveHint时，你可以设置一个boolean inBackground标志为true。当onResume被调用时，如果inBackground标志被设置，只假设你回到前台。这是因为onResume也将被调用在你的主要活动，如果用户只是在你的设置菜单，从来没有离开应用程序。

Remember that if the user hits the home button while in your settings screen, onUserLeaveHint will be called in your settings activity, and when they return onResume will be called in your settings activity. If you only have this detection code in your main activity you will miss this use case. To have this code in all your activities without duplicating code, have an abstract activity class which extends Activity, and put your common code in it. Then each activity you have can extend this abstract activity.

例如:

public abstract AbstractActivity extends Activity {
    private static boolean inBackground = false;

    @Override
    public void onResume() {
        if (inBackground) {
            // You just came from the background
            inBackground = false;
        }
        else {
            // You just returned from another activity within your own app
        }
    }

    @Override
    public void onUserLeaveHint() {
        inBackground = true;
    }
}

public abstract MainActivity extends AbstractActivity {
    ...
}

public abstract SettingsActivity extends AbstractActivity {
    ...
}

编辑2:我在下面写的东西实际上是行不通的。谷歌拒绝了一个包含对ActivityManager.getRunningTasks()调用的应用程序。从文档中可以明显看出，这个API仅用于调试和开发。一旦我有时间更新下面的GitHub项目，我就会更新这篇文章，使用一个使用计时器的新方案，几乎一样好。

编辑1:我已经写了一篇博客文章，并创建了一个简单的GitHub存储库，使这非常容易。

公认的和最高评价的答案都不是最好的方法。排名最高的答案是isApplicationBroughtToBackground()的实现，它不处理应用程序的主活动屈服于同一个应用程序中定义的活动，但它有不同的Java包的情况。我想到了一种方法，在这种情况下行得通。

在onPause()中调用它，它会告诉你你的应用程序是否因为另一个应用程序已经启动而进入后台，或者用户已经按下了home键。

public static boolean isApplicationBroughtToBackground(final Activity activity) {
  ActivityManager activityManager = (ActivityManager) activity.getSystemService(Context.ACTIVITY_SERVICE);
  List<ActivityManager.RunningTaskInfo> tasks = activityManager.getRunningTasks(1);

  // Check the top Activity against the list of Activities contained in the Application's package.
  if (!tasks.isEmpty()) {
    ComponentName topActivity = tasks.get(0).topActivity;
    try {
      PackageInfo pi = activity.getPackageManager().getPackageInfo(activity.getPackageName(), PackageManager.GET_ACTIVITIES);
      for (ActivityInfo activityInfo : pi.activities) {
        if(topActivity.getClassName().equals(activityInfo.name)) {
          return false;
        }
      }
    } catch( PackageManager.NameNotFoundException e) {
      return false; // Never happens.
    }
  }
  return true;
}

这里有一个解决方案，通过使用deboning逻辑，确保我们不会得到连续的背景/前景事件。所以，它总是反映一种稳定的背景/前景状态。

import androidx.lifecycle.Lifecycle
import androidx.lifecycle.LifecycleEventObserver
import androidx.lifecycle.LifecycleOwner
import java.util.Timer
import java.util.TimerTask

/**
 * An observer class to listen on the app's lifecycle.
 */
class AppLifecycleObserver(
    private val onAppGoesToBackground: () -> Unit = {},
    private val onAppEntersForeground: () -> Unit = {}
) : LifecycleEventObserver {

    private val debounce = DebouncingTimer(timeout = 10)

    override fun onStateChanged(source: LifecycleOwner, event: Lifecycle.Event) {
        debounce.refresh {
            when (event.targetState) {
                Lifecycle.State.CREATED -> onAppGoesToBackground()
                Lifecycle.State.RESUMED -> onAppEntersForeground()
                else -> Unit
            }
        }
    }

    fun attach() {
        ProcessLifecycleOwner.get().lifecycle.addObserver(this)
    }

    fun detach() {
        ProcessLifecycleOwner.get().lifecycle.removeObserver(this)
    }

    private class DebouncingTimer(private val timeout: Long) {

        private var timer: Timer? = null

        fun refresh(job: () -> Unit) {
            timer?.cancel()
            timer = Timer()
            timer?.schedule(object : TimerTask() {
                override fun run() = job.invoke()
            }, timeout)
        }
    }
}

只需要创建一个AppLifecycleObserver实例:

private val appLifecycleObserver = AppLifecycleObserver(
        onAppGoesToBackground = { // do whatever... },
        onAppEntersForeground = { // do whatever... }
    )

// Attach the observer when it is needed:
appLifecycleObserver.attach()

// Remove when there is no need to it:
appLifecycleObserver.detach()

不要忘记添加一个合适的依赖版本:

implementation("androidx.lifecycle:lifecycle-process:$lifecycle_version")

下面是我解决这个问题的方法。它的工作前提是，在活动转换之间使用时间参考最有可能提供足够的证据来证明应用程序是否“背景化”。

首先，我使用了一个android.app.Application实例(让我们称它为MyApplication)，它有一个Timer，一个TimerTask，一个常量来表示从一个活动过渡到另一个活动可以合理地花费的最大毫秒数(我用了一个2s的值)，一个布尔值来指示应用程序是否“在后台”:

public class MyApplication extends Application {

    private Timer mActivityTransitionTimer;
    private TimerTask mActivityTransitionTimerTask;
    public boolean wasInBackground;
    private final long MAX_ACTIVITY_TRANSITION_TIME_MS = 2000;
    ...

应用程序还提供了两种方法来启动和停止定时器/任务:

public void startActivityTransitionTimer() {
    this.mActivityTransitionTimer = new Timer();
    this.mActivityTransitionTimerTask = new TimerTask() {
        public void run() {
            MyApplication.this.wasInBackground = true;
        }
    };

    this.mActivityTransitionTimer.schedule(mActivityTransitionTimerTask,
                                           MAX_ACTIVITY_TRANSITION_TIME_MS);
}

public void stopActivityTransitionTimer() {
    if (this.mActivityTransitionTimerTask != null) {
        this.mActivityTransitionTimerTask.cancel();
    }

    if (this.mActivityTransitionTimer != null) {
        this.mActivityTransitionTimer.cancel();
    }

    this.wasInBackground = false;
}

这个解决方案的最后一部分是从所有活动的onResume()和onPause()事件中添加对这些方法的调用，或者，最好是在所有具体活动继承的基础活动中:

@Override
public void onResume()
{
    super.onResume();

    MyApplication myApp = (MyApplication)this.getApplication();
    if (myApp.wasInBackground)
    {
        //Do specific came-here-from-background code
    }

    myApp.stopActivityTransitionTimer();
}

@Override
public void onPause()
{
    super.onPause();
    ((MyApplication)this.getApplication()).startActivityTransitionTimer();
}

所以在这种情况下，当用户只是在你的应用程序的活动之间导航，离开活动的onPause()启动定时器，但几乎立即进入的新活动取消定时器之前，它可以达到最大过渡时间。wasInBackground也是假的。

另一方面，当一个Activity从启动器来到前台，设备被唤醒，结束电话呼叫等，更有可能是定时器任务在此事件之前执行，因此wasInBackground被设置为true。

我喜欢ProcessLifecycleOwner方法，但实际上可以跳过所有这些，因为在Activity的onCreate()方法中，可以很容易地确定它是第一次运行还是后续运行:

@Override
protected void onCreate(Bundle savedInstanceState) {
    super.onCreate(savedInstanceState);
    if (savedInstanceState == null) {
        /* savedInstanceState is always null on first run */
    } else {
        /* it's a subsequent run */
    }
}