这应该是一个衬垫。

public String [] concatenate (final String array1[], final String array2[])
{
    return Stream.concat(Stream.of(array1), Stream.of(array2)).toArray(String[]::new);
}

你可以试试这个

 public static Object[] addTwoArray(Object[] objArr1, Object[] objArr2){
    int arr1Length = objArr1!=null && objArr1.length>0?objArr1.length:0;
    int arr2Length = objArr2!=null && objArr2.length>0?objArr2.length:0;
    Object[] resutlentArray = new Object[arr1Length+arr2Length]; 
    for(int i=0,j=0;i<resutlentArray.length;i++){
        if(i+1<=arr1Length){
            resutlentArray[i]=objArr1[i];
        }else{
            resutlentArray[i]=objArr2[j];
            j++;
        }
    }

    return resutlentArray;
}

你可以键入你的数组！！！

使用高性能System.arraycopy而不需要@SuppressWarnings注释的通用静态版本：

public static <T> T[] arrayConcat(T[] a, T[] b) {
    T[] both = Arrays.copyOf(a, a.length + b.length);
    System.arraycopy(b, 0, both, a.length, b.length);
    return both;
}

我认为泛型的最佳解决方案是：

/* This for non primitive types */
public static <T> T[] concatenate (T[]... elements) {

    T[] C = null;
    for (T[] element: elements) {
        if (element==null) continue;
        if (C==null) C = (T[]) Array.newInstance(element.getClass().getComponentType(), element.length);
        else C = resizeArray(C, C.length+element.length);

        System.arraycopy(element, 0, C, C.length-element.length, element.length);
    }

    return C;
}

/**
 * as far as i know, primitive types do not accept generics 
 * http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2721546/why-dont-java-generics-support-primitive-types
 * for primitive types we could do something like this:
 * */
public static int[] concatenate (int[]... elements){
    int[] C = null;
    for (int[] element: elements) {
        if (element==null) continue;
        if (C==null) C = new int[element.length];
        else C = resizeArray(C, C.length+element.length);

        System.arraycopy(element, 0, C, C.length-element.length, element.length);
    }
    return C;
}

private static <T> T resizeArray (T array, int newSize) {
    int oldSize =
            java.lang.reflect.Array.getLength(array);
    Class elementType =
            array.getClass().getComponentType();
    Object newArray =
            java.lang.reflect.Array.newInstance(
                    elementType, newSize);
    int preserveLength = Math.min(oldSize, newSize);
    if (preserveLength > 0)
        System.arraycopy(array, 0,
                newArray, 0, preserveLength);
    return (T) newArray;
}

我最近一直在与过度的记忆循环作斗争。如果已知a和/或b通常是空的，这里是silvertab代码的另一种修改（也被通用化）：

private static <T> T[] concatOrReturnSame(T[] a, T[] b) {
    final int alen = a.length;
    final int blen = b.length;
    if (alen == 0) {
        return b;
    }
    if (blen == 0) {
        return a;
    }
    final T[] result = (T[]) java.lang.reflect.Array.
            newInstance(a.getClass().getComponentType(), alen + blen);
    System.arraycopy(a, 0, result, 0, alen);
    System.arraycopy(b, 0, result, alen, blen);
    return result;
}

编辑：这篇文章的前一个版本指出，像这样的数组重用应该清楚地记录下来。正如Maarten在评论中指出的那样，一般来说，最好删除if语句，这样就不需要文档了。但话说回来，那些if语句首先就是这个特定优化的要点。我会在这里留下这个答案，但要小心！

Object[] mixArray(String[] a, String[] b)
String[] s1 = a;
String[] s2 = b;
Object[] result;
List<String> input = new ArrayList<String>();
for (int i = 0; i < s1.length; i++)
{
    input.add(s1[i]);
}
for (int i = 0; i < s2.length; i++)
{
    input.add(s2[i]);
}
result = input.toArray();
return result;