void f(String[] first, String[] second) {
    String[] both = new String[first.length+second.length];
    for(int i=0;i<first.length;i++)
        both[i] = first[i];
    for(int i=0;i<second.length;i++)
        both[first.length + i] = second[i];
}

这一个在不了解任何其他类/库等的情况下工作。它适用于任何数据类型。只需将String替换为int、double或char等任意值。它的工作效率很高。

 /**
     * With Java Streams
     * @param first First Array
     * @param second Second Array
     * @return Merged Array
     */
    String[] mergeArrayOfStrings(String[] first, String[] second) {
        return Stream.concat(Arrays.stream(first), Arrays.stream(second)).toArray(String[]::new);
    }

ArrayList<String> both = new ArrayList(Arrays.asList(first));
both.addAll(Arrays.asList(second));

both.toArray(new String[0]);

我认为泛型的最佳解决方案是：

/* This for non primitive types */
public static <T> T[] concatenate (T[]... elements) {

    T[] C = null;
    for (T[] element: elements) {
        if (element==null) continue;
        if (C==null) C = (T[]) Array.newInstance(element.getClass().getComponentType(), element.length);
        else C = resizeArray(C, C.length+element.length);

        System.arraycopy(element, 0, C, C.length-element.length, element.length);
    }

    return C;
}

/**
 * as far as i know, primitive types do not accept generics 
 * http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2721546/why-dont-java-generics-support-primitive-types
 * for primitive types we could do something like this:
 * */
public static int[] concatenate (int[]... elements){
    int[] C = null;
    for (int[] element: elements) {
        if (element==null) continue;
        if (C==null) C = new int[element.length];
        else C = resizeArray(C, C.length+element.length);

        System.arraycopy(element, 0, C, C.length-element.length, element.length);
    }
    return C;
}

private static <T> T resizeArray (T array, int newSize) {
    int oldSize =
            java.lang.reflect.Array.getLength(array);
    Class elementType =
            array.getClass().getComponentType();
    Object newArray =
            java.lang.reflect.Array.newInstance(
                    elementType, newSize);
    int preserveLength = Math.min(oldSize, newSize);
    if (preserveLength > 0)
        System.arraycopy(array, 0,
                newArray, 0, preserveLength);
    return (T) newArray;
}

仅使用Java自己的API：

String[] join(String[]... arrays) {
  // calculate size of target array
  int size = 0;
  for (String[] array : arrays) {
    size += array.length;
  }

  // create list of appropriate size
  java.util.List list = new java.util.ArrayList(size);

  // add arrays
  for (String[] array : arrays) {
    list.addAll(java.util.Arrays.asList(array));
  }

  // create and return final array
  return list.toArray(new String[size]);
}

现在，这段代码不是最有效的，但它只依赖于标准的java类，而且很容易理解。它适用于任意数量的String[]（甚至是零数组）。

每个答案都是复制数据并创建新阵列。这并不是绝对必要的，如果您的阵列相当大，这绝对不是您想要做的。Java创建者已经知道数组拷贝是浪费的，这就是为什么他们提供System.arrayCopy（）来在我们必须时在Java之外进行这些拷贝的原因。

与其四处复制数据，不如考虑将其保留在原地，并从中提取数据所在的位置。仅仅因为程序员想组织数据位置而复制数据位置并不总是明智的。

// I have arrayA and arrayB; would like to treat them as concatenated
// but leave my damn bytes where they are!
Object accessElement ( int index ) {
     if ( index < 0 ) throw new ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException(...);
     // is reading from the head part?
     if ( index < arrayA.length )
          return arrayA[ index ];
     // is reading from the tail part?
     if ( index < ( arrayA.length + arrayB.length ) )
          return arrayB[ index - arrayA.length ];
     throw new ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException(...); // index too large
}