这可能是一个有争议的评论，但是，总的来说，我发现当我与微软保持一致时，我的生活更容易。我们不可能知道他们做事的全部深层原因(我想有时是非常严格的，有时是笨拙的)。

他们在自动生成的文件(如Assembly文件)中使用“”，所以这就是我所做的。事实上，当我尝试用字符串替换任何下面的“”。空，Visual Studio崩溃在我身上。这可能有一个合乎逻辑的解释，但以我有限的知识，如果我只是做他们做的事情，大多数时候，事情都会解决。(反:我知道一些自动生成的文件也使用字符串。空的，这有点打破我的观点。:))

<Assembly: System.Reflection.AssemblyCulture("")>
<Assembly: System.Reflection.AssemblyDescription("")>
<Assembly: System.Reflection.AssemblyFileVersion("1.0.0.0")>
<Assembly: System.Reflection.AssemblyKeyFile("")>
<Assembly: System.Reflection.AssemblyProduct("")>
<Assembly: System.Reflection.AssemblyTitle("")>

我用的是第三个，但在其他两个中，第一个似乎没那么奇怪。 string是string的别名，但在赋值中看到它们会让人感觉不舒服。

I strongly prefer String.Empty, aside from the other reasons to ensure you know what it is and that you have not accidentally removed the contents, but primarily for internationalization. If I see a string in quotes then I always have to wonder whether that is new code and it should be put into a string table. So every time code gets changed/reviewed you need to look for "something in quotes" and yes you can filter out the empty strings but I tell people it is good practice to never put strings in quotes unless you know it won't get localized.

我更喜欢字符串而不是字符串。选择字符串。空而不是“”是选择一个并坚持下去的问题。使用字符串的优点。空是很明显你的意思，你不会不小心复制了不可打印的字符，如“\x003”在你的“”。

The empty string is like empty set just a name that everybody uses to call "". Also in formal languages strings created from an alphabet that have zero length are called the empty string. Both set and string have a special symbol for it. Empty string: ε and empty set: ∅. If you want to talk about this zero length string you will call it the empty string so everybody knows exactly what you are referring to. Now in case you name it the empty string why not use string.Empty in code, its shows the intention is explicit. Downside is that it’s not a constant and therefore not available everywhere, like in attributes. (It's not a constant for some technical reasons, see the reference source.)

从性能和代码生成的角度来看，确实没有什么区别。在性能测试中，它们在哪个比另一个更快之间来回切换，而且仅以毫秒计。

在查看幕后代码时，您也看不到任何不同。唯一的区别在于IL，即字符串。空使用操作码ldsfld ""使用ldstr操作码，但这只是因为字符串。Empty是静态的，两个指令做相同的事情。 如果你看一下生产出来的组件，它是完全一样的。

c#代码

private void Test1()
{
    string test1 = string.Empty;    
    string test11 = test1;
}

private void Test2()
{
    string test2 = "";    
    string test22 = test2;
}

有密码

.method private hidebysig instance void 
          Test1() cil managed
{
  // Code size       10 (0xa)
  .maxstack  1
  .locals init ([0] string test1,
                [1] string test11)
  IL_0000:  nop
  IL_0001:  ldsfld     string [mscorlib]System.String::Empty
  IL_0006:  stloc.0
  IL_0007:  ldloc.0
  IL_0008:  stloc.1
  IL_0009:  ret
} // end of method Form1::Test1

.method private hidebysig instance void 
        Test2() cil managed
{
  // Code size       10 (0xa)
  .maxstack  1
  .locals init ([0] string test2,
                [1] string test22)
  IL_0000:  nop
  IL_0001:  ldstr      ""
  IL_0006:  stloc.0
  IL_0007:  ldloc.0
  IL_0008:  stloc.1
  IL_0009:  ret
} // end of method Form1::Test2

汇编代码

        string test1 = string.Empty;
0000003a  mov         eax,dword ptr ds:[022A102Ch] 
0000003f  mov         dword ptr [ebp-40h],eax 

        string test11 = test1;
00000042  mov         eax,dword ptr [ebp-40h] 
00000045  mov         dword ptr [ebp-44h],eax 

        string test2 = "";
0000003a  mov         eax,dword ptr ds:[022A202Ch] 
00000040  mov         dword ptr [ebp-40h],eax 

        string test22 = test2;
00000043  mov         eax,dword ptr [ebp-40h] 
00000046  mov         dword ptr [ebp-44h],eax